Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Anyone seen it?

tZN1rGn.jpg
 
Support for Brexit falls sharply in Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland would vote overwhelmingly in favour of remaining in the EU if a second referendum was held, a survey has found.

The survey comes as the Brexit secretary, David Davis, made a second flying visit to Northern Ireland on Sunday, meeting businesses as part of his cabinet research into the “maximum facilitation” option for a post-Brexit customs system.

In 2016, the region voted 56% to remain and 44% to leave, but support for leaving the bloc has fallen 13 points to 31%, undermining the Democratic Unionist party’s continued staunch backing for Brexit.

“The proportion wanting to remain has risen since the 2016 referendum as more people have become aware of the possible costs and inconveniences of leaving the EU, as citizens and as employees or employers,” said Brendan O’Leary, a professor of political science at Queen’s University Belfast.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/21/support-for-brexit-falls-sharply-in-northern-ireland
 
Mogg and co will turn this country into the world's biggest tax haven.

I've wondered for a while now, does anyone actually think that ridiculous toff twat could actually win an election? I keep making terrible predictions, so I'm doubting myself now, but I just don't see it.
 
I've wondered for a while now, does anyone actually think that ridiculous toff twat could actually win an election? I keep making terrible predictions, so I'm doubting myself now, but I just don't see it.

I think he might. Despite loathing the meat of his politics I find the bloke to be quite charming and his mode of speaking strangely compelling. I suspect he's the definition of statesmanlike for a great number of people and I can definitely see him persuading enough doubters of his ineffable wisdom to win a general. When push comes to shove we're still largely socialised to be a nation of hat-doffers. Dude'll wrap himself in the flag, stare into the middle distance and have opinion leaders and Times op-eds devoted to praising his commanding calm and political acumen.
 
Flicking through my company facebook page the other day and noticed a few likes from someone with an 'I'm voting UKIP' banner on their picture. I checked out their feed and it was literally nothing but shared memes about illegal immigrant rape gangs, halal, 'young people should be grateful that we won the war' (despite them not being old enough to fight in it) and 'share if you remember'....

Is it fair to say there are people out there who have been 'radicalised' by social media? I don't want to use the stupid label but I certainly think most sensible people would probably avoid a conversation with such an individual.

The unfortunate reality is that so many people are seemingly unable to think critically for themselves, and so take anything they see online at face value.
 
I've wondered for a while now, does anyone actually think that ridiculous toff twat could actually win an election? I keep making terrible predictions, so I'm doubting myself now, but I just don't see it.
If May resigned, he'd absolutely win the leadership election. Assuming it's put to party members.
 
I think he might. Despite loathing the meat of his politics I find the bloke to be quite charming and his mode of speaking strangely compelling. I suspect he's the definition of statesmanlike for a great number of people and I can definitely see him persuading enough doubters of his ineffable wisdom to win a general. When push comes to shove we're still largely socialised to be a nation of hat-doffers. Dude'll wrap himself in the flag, stare into the middle distance and have opinion leaders and Times op-eds devoted to praising his commanding calm and political acumen.
I know, I've spent years hating how ludicrous and just plain inefficient it is for a handful of the Eton privileged to have so much influence, but I agree, he has a way with him. As for winning an election it would come down to who the floating voters trusted to better run the country, McDonnell and Corbyn, or him.
 
Charming :lol:

It doesn't take much reading to see that Rees-Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime is a dangerous faux-religious hypocrite who uses Christianity as a catch-all excuse for many of his policies whilst conveniently forgetting it with others.

Double-breasted suits and a toffee mouth do not equate to charming.
 
I know, I've spent years hating how ludicrous and just plain inefficient it is for a handful of the Eton privileged to have so much influence, but I agree, he has a way with him. As for winning an election it would come down to who the floating voters trusted to better run the country, McDonnell and Corbyn, or him.

Surely there must be one decent politician in the whole of the UK (of any party) who could lead the country well - I can't think of any.
 
Charming is not the word that jumps to mind when I think of Jacob Rees-Mogg.
 
I think he might. Despite loathing the meat of his politics I find the bloke to be quite charming and his mode of speaking strangely compelling. I suspect he's the definition of statesmanlike for a great number of people and I can definitely see him persuading enough doubters of his ineffable wisdom to win a general. When push comes to shove we're still largely socialised to be a nation of hat-doffers. Dude'll wrap himself in the flag, stare into the middle distance and have opinion leaders and Times op-eds devoted to praising his commanding calm and political acumen.
Still can't fathom how he is deemed an affable eccentric, when he has some of the most odious primitive views on abortion and the like.
I guess he has more character than May, which isn't hard, and is massively pro-Brexit, which is probably all that is needed for some voters tbf.
 
I get the impression the group of countries with which Liam Fox manages to sign a trade deal will be about as impressive as the coalition the US assembled to invade Iraq.
 
It's always been an 'any cost' Brexit though, so doubt this would make much cut through when it comes to the official line of the Tory government and Labour opposition which have always been support for an any cost Brexit.

The forecast in terms of household income, GDP, trade deficiits etc have always ranged from pretty bad to dire. In the face of that May and Corbyn both stand up and effectively support Brexit in spite of knowing the impact they'll have on people in this country. It's optimistic to hope that people who want something despite what damage it'll do will somehow change their mind after learning what damage it can do.

It'll just prompt each party to double down on somehow pretending their policy of 'Leave and get the best deal' is somehow less bollocks than the other party whose policy is 'Leave and get the best deal'. For the sake of placating many people we have to go through the ridiculous charade of actually pretending that those are two entirely different policies.
 
Brexiters don't care, all that matters is that they won. Other than the vote itself no-one knows, including themselves, what they've won. Many more prizes to look forward to when they finally leave.
If I referenced Carney today saying households are £900 worse off cos of Brexit, people like my mother would say 'it's worth it to take back control'. I guess they'll pay any price to see a few less brown faces or hear less Polish accents.
Ideologists can't be reasoned with and my mother is sure the economic pain will be a short-term blip.
Sorry, I know a lot of us have been sharing the same frustrations for ages now, but it never fails to both sadden and anger me that people still think this is a good idea, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
 
If I referenced Carney today saying households are £900 worse off cos of Brexit, people like my mother would say 'it's worth it to take back control'. I guess they'll pay any price to see a few less brown faces or hear less Polish accents.
Ideologists can't be reasoned with and my mother is sure the economic pain will be a short-term blip.
Sorry, I know a lot of us have been sharing the same frustrations for ages now, but it never fails to both sadden and anger me that people still think this is a good idea, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

I also genuinely think a lot of people don't fully realise what a household being £900 worse off means in real terms. They'd need to actually feel the effects rather than have them described to them.
 
I also genuinely think a lot of people don't fully realise what a household being £900 worse off means in real terms. They'd need to actually feel the effects rather than have them described to them.
Yeah and unless you are really breadline, you'll absorb that over the year and not really notice 20p extra on your loaf of bread, jar of coffee or whatever.
The lies though about developing wider global trade deals beyond the EU. I still have some stupid forlorn hope that the electoral commission kyboshes the bloody referendum vote.
 
Mark Carney announces that the BoE estimate households are on average £900 a year worse off as a result of Brexit.

The response seems to be "But Iraq..." because Blair said something. It's the biggest elephant in the room, I think, that we 'new/old' left don't really seem to give much of a shit about the economic impact of Brexit on poor people but are massively excited by the prospect of letting people know how much they opposed the Iraq war for the billionth time
 
Mark Carney announces that the BoE estimate households are on average £900 a year worse off as a result of Brexit.

The response seems to be "But Iraq..." because Blair said something. It's the biggest elephant in the room, I think, that we 'new/old' left don't really seem to give much of a shit about the economic impact of Brexit on poor people but are massively excited by the prospect of letting people know how much they opposed the Iraq war for the billionth time

Can you find some examples of this?
 
Can we just fake Brexit, like have all EU name/flags removed from the UK, passports, anything else linking the UK to the EU but still remain legally in the EU? Brexiters won't look at legal documents so they won't notice.
 
It's always been an 'any cost' Brexit though, so doubt this would make much cut through when it comes to the official line of the Tory government and Labour opposition which have always been support for an any cost Brexit.

The forecast in terms of household income, GDP, trade deficiits etc have always ranged from pretty bad to dire. In the face of that May and Corbyn both stand up and effectively support Brexit in spite of knowing the impact they'll have on people in this country. It's optimistic to hope that people who want something despite what damage it'll do will somehow change their mind after learning what damage it can do.

It'll just prompt each party to double down on somehow pretending their policy of 'Leave and get the best deal' is somehow less bollocks than the other party whose policy is 'Leave and get the best deal'. For the sake of placating many people we have to go through the ridiculous charade of actually pretending that those are two entirely different policies.

It's abundantly clear that Corbyn wants out of the EU and it suits him to let the Tories make an absolute bollox of the whole thing, so he can sweep into power on the back of a Great British public who are furious about being sold a pup.
 
It's abundantly clear that Corbyn wants out of the EU and it suits him to let the Tories make an absolute bollox of the whole thing, so he can sweep into power on the back of a Great British public who are furious about being sold a pup.

The only reason I could deal with a Corbyn Brexit over a Tory one is because I think he’d work bloody hard to retain the EU protection in place for People and Animals.

I think the Tory’s hope for Brexit is a tax haven with major deregulation so businesses can exploit people even more.

Essentially what the Republican’s are currently achieving across the Atlantic.
 
The only reason I could deal with a Corbyn Brexit over a Tory one is because I think he’d work bloody hard to retain the EU protection in place for People and Animals.

I think the Tory’s hope for Brexit is a tax haven with major deregulation so businesses can exploit people even more.

Essentially what the Republican’s are currently achieving across the Atlantic.
The tax haven idea is a strange one. There are plenty of tax havens (Ireland, Netherlands, Switzerland) that have full customs union access anyway, it's not like by turning itself into a tax haven the UK would suddenly be in a position of advantage. Businesses will still pick the tax haven with full customs union access!