Expecting a few of these but there’s no chance it will be enough to swing it in her favour. The ones that will switch and vote for her deal will be doing so because they’re from deep Brexit territory and don’t want to upset their voters.
When we voted there was only one question and only two answers.
Stay. Or. Leave.
There was nothing to suggest leaving with a deal of any any description it was simply leave. These politicians have once again had us over. So much for democracy. A no deal leave would as May said be better than a bad deal and this so called deal is rotten to the core.
Expecting a few of these but there’s no chance it will be enough to swing it in her favour. The ones that will switch and vote for her deal will be doing so because they’re from deep Brexit territory and don’t want to upset their voters.
It's funny how the UK, Germany and France all conduct themselves as a reaction to major historic events taught in their schoolbooks.
More like 150 I thinkBets on the vote margin?
I say May loses by 50
It's funny how the UK, Germany and France all conduct themselves as a reaction to major historic events taught in their schoolbooks.
Germany has become the 'nice guy' of Europe with it's pro-refugee stance a reaction to it's part in WW2.
France has been the scene of almost constant riots in an echo of the people power of the Revolution.
And the UK operates like it's the head of an Empire that can defeat all of Europe on its own.
No doubt.That's an insult to the revolutionaries, we just have a minority of absolute feckwits.
My sweepstake is on 172.More like 150 I think
Didn't it? The church within England was powerful and ridiculously wealthy. By the time Henry had finished he'd utterly broken that power, confiscated it's massive wealth and even razed lots of it's physical infrastructure to the ground. He then wasted the cash of course, but that's an irrelevance to the monasteries and abbeys, whose wealth and lands and power were never to return. A good thing too, for the long-term future of England. I accept Henry wasn't an existential threat to the pope and Rome, but losing England didn't exactly go down well, it must have cost them quite a bit. Don't know what you mean by 'trying to bully' either, he clearly won, as far as his battle with Rome went.I think henry committed many many mistakes including
A- marrying an older woman out of pure status
B- boasting about his first night which made him look silly when he tried to argue that the marriage was not consumated
C- Giving in to Anne Boleyn which in reality was the main issue (i explain later)
D- Trying to bully the church which was silly considering the church had nothing to fear from tudor
Ultimately the situation could have been resolved with patience. Henry could have kept Cat as queen, he could marry mary off to a minor lord who wouldn't try to aim for the big price himself and he could have a horde of bastards which the church would likely legitimatise just to keep England catholic
Instead he opted for the my way or the high way policy which lead to untold misery to England and his dynasty
Expecting a few of these but there’s no chance it will be enough to swing it in her favour. The ones that will switch and vote for her deal will be doing so because they’re from deep Brexit territory and don’t want to upset their voters.
More like 150 I think
Worth watching on TV?
Worth watching on TV?Brexiter: I'm voting against this deal because it's not what I want
Remainer: I'm voting against this deal because it's not what I want.
Country reunited.
Worth watching on TV?
Didn't it? The church within England was powerful and ridiculously wealthy. By the time Henry had finished he'd utterly broken that power, confiscated it's massive wealth and even razed lots of it's physical infrastructure to the ground. He then wasted the cash of course, but that's an irrelevance to the monasteries and abbeys, whose wealth and lands and power were never to return. A good thing too, for the long-term future of England. I accept Henry wasn't an existential threat to the pope and Rome, but losing England didn't exactly go down well, it must have cost them quite a bit. Don't know what you mean by 'trying to bully' either, he clearly won, as far as his battle with Rome went.
Listening on the radio...Not yet. You could have a laugh at Corbyn.
Same old, same oldDoes sound like she's just going to bring it back again from what commentators are saying. Incredible if so.
Corbyn speech on now, nothing of substance yet really. Mainly calling for a GE and renegotiation
Listening on the radio...
Basically must respect the first referendum
Reopen negotiation with the EU
If he can't force an election I don't think he will back a 2nd referendum but instead look for a Norway type deal instead
In case it passes (same as Benn did)Why the feck is Blackford removing his amendment. It's the one useful motion
Why the feck is Blackford removing his amendment. It's the one useful motion
How are they going to renegotiate a new withdrawal agreement? As I said all the amendments are pointless.
What do you mean how? By requesting the extension of A50 it was in his amendment text i believe.
What do you mean how? By requesting the extension of A50 it was in his amendment text i believe.
Yeah, I only meant he won as in he resisted the demands of the Vatican, he made loads of mistakes in general. I thought the Elizabethan age is generally regarded as pretty successful for England really, she was just a bit shit at propagating. Would I have the monasteries back though, owning half of England and dictating the politics of the day? Hell no, but again, it's just a pity he wasted the cash the way he did. A little part of me is saying we might be getting a bit off topic as well - but you started it.It was certainly no threat to the Vatican or the RCC.
I don't think he won either. His aim was to leave a dynasty that will last centuries. Instead the Tudor dynasty with his children as a traumatised Elisabeth preferred taking her own dynasty to the grave then give power to a man. Tudor left an England that was divided, which was a pariah in Europe and was left vulnerable to a crusade which actually happened. He could have lost more if that's what you mean (England might have become Spanish)
They can't extend for renegotiation, only for GE or referendum. And the other 27 agreeing.
Of course they can, the point of allowing it for a GE is a shift in terms. If May tries to renegotiate on the same red lines then yes they'll refuse but if she reaches out on a cross party basis to come up with something that will command a majority (if possible) they'll extend. That's the main point of the discussed july extension.
The direction of travel is for a better deal for them.
600 vs 24 on the amendment![]()