Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
It's not his fault the country is full of racists.

Yet again I have to point out that his only fault in this was his naivety in underestimating the stupidness of the British voting public.

It is his fault he spent years pandering to them though for electoral self-gain. If he'd valued the EU so much he probably shouldn't have spent years scapegoating it for his own government's failings.
 
Rehman Chishti Conservative MP:
Lets be frank, brexit meant many things to many people, there wasn't one issue. But what was clear was that we have to respect the will of the people and that means leaving on the 29th of march."

FFS, these people are so intellectually dishonest that they don't even notice when the say contradictory things within two sentences. How are these people the representatives of such a proud nation?

At least Donald is honest about liking hamburgers...
 
Id suggest you read about it. The King was a devout Catholic who wrote a book about how important it is for the church to act as a moral compass over Europe. He also decided to marry his dead brother's widow Catherine D'Aragon as she was one of the most powerful women in the world being the daughter of Isabella d'Aragon and the aunt of Charles V who basically ruled half of Europe. That was until Henry lost hope in his wife producing a male heir and his lover refused to let him touch her unless she becomes queen.

Henry decided to commit a massive U-Turn on both church teachings and his wife and ask for a divorce. The Church surprisingly took an open minded view about and even sent Cardinal Campeggio who first tried to reconcile the couple then to pressure Catherine to retire in some monastery. Yet things needed to be dealt delicately as divorce went against the church teachings and Nephew Charles wasn't exactly someone the church wanted to piss off.

Well, time and patience weren't exactly Henry's strength as he demanded the Church to take the decision ASAP. Pressured by Henry's thugs Campeggio and his ilk decided to shift matters out of London and into the pope's court which infuriated Henry further. He decided to get back control, by leaving the church, marry Anne Boleyn and create a religion of his own. It turned out that Anne Boleyn couldn't produce a male heir either and was executed. In total Henry had 6 wives, 2 of which ended up beheaded and 1 who lived in misery for all her life. His dynasty died 1 generation after as his son Edward died as a young man, Mary died with what is thought to be cancer and Elizabeth was too traumatised to get married and rescind power to yet another male.

All English were effected by this madness. The Catholics suffered under Henry, Edward and Elizabeth while the Protestants suffered under Mary, whom, like her mother was catholic. There was also a crusade against England which was a failure, which lead to a counter crusade by the English on the Spanish which also failed

Don't see the connection but the serfs didn't vote in a referendum.
 
Don't see the connection but the serfs didn't vote in a referendum.

I see plenty of connections.

- Both HT and the UK started hating the very things they previously acted as champions for. Henry was in favour of Catherine + the church. The UK were a big fan of FOM, the enlargement of the EU and the single market.
- they both expected the rules to become different for them then for the rest (divorce/end of FOM despite being part of the EU) out of pure selfish reasons.
- they both refused the EU/church the time needed to come out with a decent solution to their new issues
- they both left the group, thinking they will end up better when in reality they ended worse
- the one's suffering were the commoners

Regarding selfs, I do recall then Lord Rees Mogg has quite a huge fan base despite speaking gibberish most of the time
 
I see plenty of connections.

- Both HT and the UK started hating the very things they previously acted as champions for
- they both expected the rules to be different for them then for the rest (divorce/end of FOM despite being part of the EU)
- they both gave the EU/church the time needed to come out with a decent solution
- they both left the group, thinking they will end up better when in reality they ended worse
- the one's suffering were the commoners

Regarding selfs, I do recall then Lord Rees Mogg has quite a huge fan base despite speaking gibberish most of the time

What I mean is that Henry VIII personally wanted a divorce for singularly personal reasons and the people had no say in the matter whatsoever and anyone who crossed Henry VIII was severely dealt with.
The similarity could be that May has a singular vision of Brexit and aims to enact it at any cost.
 
The thought popped in my head that the British public haven't dealt with the collapse of the British Empire.
I think that's a conversation to be had another day,
It's really not a conversation for another day. Its central to brexit. I've heard a lot of the older generation refer to the ignominy of moving from a colonial master to an EU state.
We need to discuss the impact of our illusions of grandeur in this country.
 
It's really not a conversation for another day. Its central to brexit. I've heard a lot of the older generation refer to the ignominy of moving from a colonial master to an EU state.
We need to discuss the impact of our illusions of grandeur in this country.

I honestly can't fathom even the remotest understanding of why anyone in this country feels a sense of pride in it. I mean i don't expect shame either i just don't get why anyone cares beyond historical interest.
 
I honestly can't fathom even the remotest understanding of why anyone in this country feels a sense of pride in it. I mean i don't expect shame either i just don't get why anyone cares beyond historical interest.

I know, it's shit, it's been shit for at least about the last 20 years.
 
I honestly can't fathom even the remotest understanding of why anyone in this country feels a sense of pride in it. I mean i don't expect shame either i just don't get why anyone cares beyond historical interest.
I think most have no idea of the histroy of the British Empire other than some empty culture signifiers.
 
It's really not a conversation for another day. Its central to brexit. I've heard a lot of the older generation refer to the ignominy of moving from a colonial master to an EU state.
We need to discuss the impact of our illusions of grandeur in this country.

Very true - even beyond disillusion I don't actually think a lot of the British public understand the effects of colonialism.
 
What I mean is that Henry VIII personally wanted a divorce for singularly personal reasons and the people had no say in the matter whatsoever and anyone who crossed Henry VIII was severely dealt with.
The similarity could be that May has a singular vision of Brexit and aims to enact it at any cost.

I am not saying that its 100% exact. All I said is that there are plenty of similarities between the two circumstances. Actually my argument was that this mentality of asking for different rules merely because they are English is older then the British empire.
 
I honestly can't fathom even the remotest understanding of why anyone in this country feels a sense of pride in it. I mean i don't expect shame either i just don't get why anyone cares beyond historical interest.
The same reason the Turkish are proud of their Ottoman past or Russians of Tsarist and Soviet Russia. "My country was once a conqueror, that makes me and my people special". It's an easy instigator of nationalism. People aren't bothered about the details.
 
what is the point of this vote now? I see no upside for her other than the fact she can say she tried. I reckon she'll lose it and quit.
 
The size of the defeat will inevitably be smaller than what is speculated.
For a lot of Tories, as much as they hate the deal, the fear of no brexit is far bigger.
 


This is an excellent - but depressing - read. Basically, the Maybot and her party are getting off far too lightly with this idea that they have always been stuck between a rock and a hard place.


Yeah spot on. Basically "you're out of your element Donny."

Sick of hearing that she's done the best she could with the mess that Cameron left behind. She's done nothing of the sort.
 
Yeah spot on. Basically "you're out of your element Donny."

Sick of hearing that she's done the best she could with the mess that Cameron left behind. She's done nothing of the sort.

I think everything she has done has simply been to hold onto power. I did enjoy her surviving the coup from the ERG though.
 
I think everything she has done has simply been to hold onto power. I did enjoy her surviving the coup from the ERG though.

That’s all any of them care about. From across the political spectrum. The future welfare of the country is just a side show, so long as whatever happens improves their chance of being in power. It’s fecking infuriating.
 
That’s all any of them care about. From across the political spectrum. The future welfare of the country is just a side show, so long as whatever happens improves their chance of being in power. It’s fecking infuriating.
You can say that about any Democratic country to be fair.

Including ours!
 
Can the Brexit process be stopped and restarted again?
8d2f0e4d-2626-41cc-801c-c1b5cc6f389d.jpg



Reality Check

The Attorney General and Conservative MP Ken Clarke have disagreed about whether Article 50 (the process which started the UK's two-year departure from the UK) could be cancelled - in order to give MPs more time to reach a consensus - and restarted later.

Geoffrey Cox told Mr Clarke that Article 50 could not be revoked unless "satisfactory evidence" was given to the EU to show the UK was ending the Brexit process altogether, rather than just pausing it.

So is Geoffrey Cox right?

It's true that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has granted the UK the power to independently stop the Brexit process. But its ruling also says that "revocation brings the withdrawal procedure to an end".

So if the UK tried to revoke Article 50 just to buy more time, the EU could argue such a move does not comply with the ECJ's ruling.

But if the EU rejected a revocation request on that basis it's unclear how it would enforce it, according to Joe Owen from the Institute for Government.

Article share tools

so its either an agreed extension (needs all 27 to agree) or complete revoking

limited options - I honestly could see may just chucking in the towel tomorrow and telling johnoson or mogg to crack on with PMQ's
 
I am not saying that its 100% exact. All I said is that there are plenty of similarities between the two circumstances. Actually my argument was that this mentality of asking for different rules merely because they are English is older then the British empire.

To be fair, Henry wasn’t the only ruler in those days to cajole or threaten the pope into interpreting canon laws imaginatively. His mistake (similar to Brexiteers) was a failure to understand the aims and interests of the other side, given Catherine was the aunt of the most powerful man in Europe, Charles V, who was quite prepared to send an army across the Alps to smash up Rome when a pope got on the wrong side of him.
 


This is an excellent - but depressing - read. Basically, the Maybot and her party are getting off far too lightly with this idea that they have always been stuck between a rock and a hard place.


Good read, agree that she's basically exacerbated the situation. What it needed was a cool head who could look to compromise, instead we got a rent-a-money whore who just flips and flops which ever way extends her reign in power.
 
To be fair, Henry wasn’t the only ruler in those days to cajole or threaten the pope into interpreting canon laws imaginatively. His mistake (similar to Brexiteers) was a failure to understand the aims and interests of the other side, given Catherine was the aunt of the most powerful man in Europe, Charles V, who was quite prepared to send an army across the Alps to smash up Rome when a pope got on the wrong side of him.

I think henry committed many many mistakes including

A- marrying an older woman out of pure status
B- boasting about his first night which made him look silly when he tried to argue that the marriage was not consumated
C- Giving in to Anne Boleyn which in reality was the main issue (i explain later)
D- Trying to bully the church which was silly considering the church had nothing to fear from tudor

Ultimately the situation could have been resolved with patience. Henry could have kept Cat as queen, he could marry mary off to a minor lord who wouldn't try to aim for the big price himself and he could have a horde of bastards which the church would likely legitimatise just to keep England catholic

Instead he opted for the my way or the high way policy which lead to untold misery to England and his dynasty
 
How though? The proposals of the hard Brexiteers were always even more unrealistic than May's.
When we voted there was only one question and only two answers.

Stay. Or. Leave.

There was nothing to suggest leaving with a deal of any any description it was simply leave. These politicians have once again had us over. So much for democracy. A no deal leave would as May said be better than a bad deal and this so called deal is rotten to the core.
 


This is an excellent - but depressing - read. Basically, the Maybot and her party are getting off far too lightly with this idea that they have always been stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Good article that. Brexit was always going to be tricky but I think she went about this in the wrong way from the outset that has tangled us into a position that will will be difficult to get out of.