Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
So 10% of Brits live abroad? Probably a huge underestimate as people like me and my family are entitled to a UK passport but don't currently have one.

Ironic that a country that spreads migrants far and wide doesn't like migrants.
 
So 10% of Brits live abroad? Probably a huge underestimate as people like me and my family are entitled to a UK passport but don't currently have one.

Ironic that a country that spreads migrants far and wide doesn't like migrants.

Come on now, I think you mean 'ex-pats'. ;)
 
So 10% of Brits live abroad? Probably a huge underestimate as people like me and my family are entitled to a UK passport but don't currently have one.

Ironic that a country that spreads migrants far and wide doesn't like migrants.

Most UK migrants from round my way move to Australia to get away from the immigration over here.

There is an irony there but also a cause and effect of sorts. Anecdotal I know but I have always thought it is why Australia has such a controversial immigration policy, has its reputation for being anti immigrant in general and why UKIP ran on a manifesto of adopting something akin to Australia's point based system.
 
There's a lot of scaremongering about existing migrants going on. It doesn't matter how often the EU say they won't discuss anything until article 50 is tendered, it seems it just won't sink in.
May has said she wishes to protect existing migrants, the EU of Poland, Rumania etc certainly will, it's a non-story.
 
So 10% of Brits live abroad? Probably a huge underestimate as people like me and my family are entitled to a UK passport but don't currently have one.

Ironic that a country that spreads migrants far and wide doesn't like migrants.
In the case of oz it was criminals.

How does oz handle immigrants looking to enter?
 
All a bit complicated - we have houses in the UK, in Germany and here. Now I'm retired we spend most of our time here, but don't have any salary based pensions from French companies or State Pension from the French Government, and the taxes I pay in the UK are more than enough to avoid having to pay any additional tax here.

When I first came here, I was working for a Swiss owned German company, but worked 100% here in France. It was all a bit complicated tax-wise, so I just stayed UK resident but then never actually got round to changing it to France or Germany or Switzerland. I paid some tax in Germany, some here and the balance in the UK.

The last 15 years or so before I retired I was working for a French company ( which I partly owned with French partners ) in West Africa and paid some taxes here and some in the UK. Paying taxes in the UK provides me with my P111 - not just to use here, but everywhere else in the EU, one of the very few benefits that the UK being a member of the EU has come up with for me personally, although like lots of other people, we've always had additional, supplementary medical insurance for use in France only. After BREXIT, that will most likely have to change to cover treatment outside of France as we don't qualify for the French equivalent of the P111 as we've never been Permanent Resident and Tax Resident here.

Stay here for good ? Well, this has been 'home' for 30-odd years and will always be home irrespective of which house we're spending time in during any particular week or month - last year, in total, was about 8 months here and a couple of months each in the UK and Germany. Not for tax reasons, just that our children live in the UK and my wife's family all live in Germany.

Depending on the outcome of how EU/UK citizens will be treated , although I don't believe too much will change, but if things do get nasty, the benefits of the UK being in the EU may become more apparent thereafter.
 
In the case of oz it was criminals.

How does oz handle immigrants looking to enter?

We are good with immigrants as long as they aren't refugees in which case we illegally deport them to 3rd world hell holes and put them in internment camps to be raped and murdered more or less without recourse. Even when sick we often let them die without proper treatment rather than bring them back to an Australian hospital. We spit on the Geneva convention. We are a disgrace.
 
Most UK migrants from round my way move to Australia to get away from the immigration over here.

There is an irony there but also a cause and effect of sorts. Anecdotal I know but I have always thought it is why Australia has such a controversial immigration policy, has its reputation for being anti immigrant in general and why UKIP ran on a manifesto of adopting something akin to Australia's point based system.

All the UK and Irish people I know out here are ashamed of our government's stance on refugees. And I don't know anyone who would have immigration to the UK in their list of reasons they moved here. The place is 97% migrants (or 100% if you go back 50,000 years).

The points system is good in that it targets skilled migration but there are other family type visas.
 
All the UK and Irish people I know out here are ashamed of our government's stance on refugees. And I don't know anyone who would have immigration to the UK in their list of reasons they moved here. The place is 97% migrants (or 100% if you go back 50,000 years).

The points system is good in that it targets skilled migration but there are other family type visas.

How ashamed of Australia's immigration policy are they then? And if Australia are such a nation of refugee and immigrants champions how on earth are the policies they employ politically viable?
 
There is a huge divide between right and left although bizarrely the Labor party pretend to agree with bits of it for fear of losing votes. Which disgusts me.

Basically the people who vote Liberal/National (Tory) are largely very right wing so breaking international treaties to mistreat refugees, especially dark skinned ones, even better Muslim's, plays very well to their voting demographic on average.

Irony isn't a major part of their skill set either.

It is why Trump likes us. We do the despicable things he dreams of.
 
The amount of poker chips in play keeps increasing though... But even if that analogy were fitting, would you say any major redistribution has taken place in the U.S since 1966? If not, does that signal that the Euro might go on another 40 odd years?


Agreed about more chips in play – but in the Eurozone it’s the Germans who are the only ones able to bring new chips to the table. So if you want to stay in the game, you have to borrow courtesy of the Germans, and if you want to ( indirectly ) borrow from the Germans, then you’ll have to agree to do whatever they tell you to do whether you like it or not. As my brother-in-law said to me at Christmas, and only half-jokingly -

All we Germans now own property abroad - it's called Greece.

As for the USA, I agree that, to the naked eye, there appears to have been no major redistribution since 1966, but only if we ignore the fact that in 1966 the US dominated the world economically whereas now Corporate USA is 50% owned by Asian and Middle East investors and US companies no longer dominate except in a few new industries which didn’t exist in 1966 such as IT and Social Media.

So, Yes, I think that there has been a fairly large redistribution.

On the other hand, I’d argue that the 2008 meltdown is what happens when credit eventually does run out – there’s only a limited amount of smoke and mirrors that borrowers and lenders can get away with until the shit really does hit the fan.

Which is full circle back to Germany – the Eurozone and the EU will continue for another 40 years and even longer but only as long Germany continues to get its own way and what it wants. If or when that stops, so does the EU. So all the other EU members have more or less a single choice – agree to Germany running the EU or quit the EU if your economy is strong enough to survive without constant financial support from the EU. In the UK’s case, it does and will continue to survive without financial support from the EU which is not the case for most of the EU’s Southern and Eastern European members such as Italy, Greece, Portugal, Slovakia, Romania, etc.


By 2025 not tommorrow. And defaulting on debt after leaving would cause retaliation that neither economy wiuld survive.
And the whole game won't stop. No other solvent country would be as stupid as the UK.



Run that one past me again….

Are you suggesting that by 2025 the Italian and Greek economies are going to change structurally and improve sufficiently well that they’ll no longer need to keep borrowing yet more and more from the ECB to pay off debts to other lenders as these debts mature between now and 2025 ?

Seems impossible to me, but maybe you’re right…..

As for the game not stopping, I think I’ve answered how and why I think it will continue or not continue in my reply to ABIZZ.
 
I'm saying that another country leaving by 2025 won't be that big a shock to the EU. If they do leave no way will they be allowed to default as it would totally tank their economy. Political suicide for the politicians that let it happen. This is why Greece talked tough and then folded like a house of cards.

And just because we are idiots doesn't meant the EU is doomed. Most countries would love to be in. Except those who are already in who would love to have the preferential treatment we got in terms of rebates.

And I think it would be a great idea to let German politicians make all of the decisions. Our lot are a shower who I wouldn't trust to park my car.
 
I'm saying that another country leaving by 2025 won't be that big a shock to the EU. If they do leave no way will they be allowed to default as it would totally tank their economy. Political suicide for the politicians that let it happen. This is why Greece talked tough and then folded like a house of cards.

And just because we are idiots doesn't meant the EU is doomed. Most countries would love to be in. Except those who are already in who would love to have the preferential treatment we got in terms of rebates.

And I think it would be a great idea to let German politicians make all of the decisions. Our lot are a shower who I wouldn't trust to park my car.


Errr....I don't think anyone can 'allow' you to default on your debts - when you default, it's because you can't afford to pay or don't want to pay and nothing to do with whether you've been 'allowed' to or not. But it happens - Argentina does it every 15 years or so because it's the only way to survive and start over when your debts are simply to big to ever be able to pay off. In the case of Greece, it's as I said before - it's only the smoke and mirrors of a complicit ECB which can't afford to allow Greece to default becasue the whole Eurozone and the EU would then collapse, so it keeps lending and pretending.....

Agreed other countries would love to be in the EU and will soon be allowed to join - like Ukraine, Turkey and Morocco.

Problem is that Ukraine is politically a nuclear bomb; Turkey has been hovering on the verge of civil war for the past 20-odd years; and letting Morocco join is opening the door for another 10+ million economic immigrants into France and Benelux.

I reckon letting those three in would be a problem too far for even German politicos to resolve.

But your comments about rebates is a bit misguided - the UK is a NET contributor to the EU, one of the very few NET contributors, so in fact the rebates are only the EU giving back to the UK some of the UK's own money.

Tell you what - you send me £10 every week. I'll send you back £5 every week, although I'll keep the other £5 and I'll spend a couple of pounds on myself and give the rest to my neighbour, who you don't know, but really needs your money to help him build a new extension on his house and then try to convince yourself that you've got a good deal. Both me and my neighbour would appreciate your generosity but will get really nasty with you if you decide you don't like this arrangement and decide to stop paying us.
 
Errr....I don't think anyone can 'allow' you to default on your debts - when you default, it's because you can't afford to pay or don't want to pay and nothing to do with whether you've been 'allowed' to or not. But it happens - Argentina does it every 15 years or so because it's the only way to survive and start over when your debts are simply to big to ever be able to pay off. In the case of Greece, it's as I said before - it's only the smoke and mirrors of a complicit ECB which can't afford to allow Greece to default becasue the whole Eurozone and the EU would then collapse, so it keeps lending and pretending.....

Agreed other countries would love to be in the EU and will soon be allowed to join - like Ukraine, Turkey and Morocco.

Problem is that Ukraine is politically a nuclear bomb; Turkey has been hovering on the verge of civil war for the past 20-odd years; and letting Morocco join is opening the door for another 10+ million economic immigrants into France and Benelux.

I reckon letting those three in would be a problem too far for even German politicos to resolve.

But your comments about rebates is a bit misguided - the UK is a NET contributor to the EU, one of the very few NET contributors, so in fact the rebates are only the EU giving back to the UK some of the UK's own money.

Tell you what - you send me £10 every week. I'll send you back £5 every week, although I'll keep the other £5 and I'll spend a couple of pounds on myself and give the rest to my neighbour, who you don't know, but really needs your money to help him build a new extension on his house and then try to convince yourself that you've got a good deal. Both me and my neighbour would appreciate your generosity but will get really nasty with you if you decide you don't like this arrangement and decide to stop paying us.

I'll have a wager with you that the Ukraine, Turkey and Morocco do not join the EU any time soon.

I'll also wager that the money the UK pay net to the EU will be less than what they lose if they leave under a Hard Brexit
 
Errr....I don't think anyone can 'allow' you to default on your debts - when you default, it's because you can't afford to pay or don't want to pay and nothing to do with whether you've been 'allowed' to or not. But it happens - Argentina does it every 15 years or so because it's the only way to survive and start over when your debts are simply to big to ever be able to pay off. In the case of Greece, it's as I said before - it's only the smoke and mirrors of a complicit ECB which can't afford to allow Greece to default becasue the whole Eurozone and the EU would then collapse, so it keeps lending and pretending.....

Agreed other countries would love to be in the EU and will soon be allowed to join - like Ukraine, Turkey and Morocco.

Problem is that Ukraine is politically a nuclear bomb; Turkey has been hovering on the verge of civil war for the past 20-odd years; and letting Morocco join is opening the door for another 10+ million economic immigrants into France and Benelux.

I reckon letting those three in would be a problem too far for even German politicos to resolve.

But your comments about rebates is a bit misguided - the UK is a NET contributor to the EU, one of the very few NET contributors, so in fact the rebates are only the EU giving back to the UK some of the UK's own money.

Tell you what - you send me £10 every week. I'll send you back £5 every week, although I'll keep the other £5 and I'll spend a couple of pounds on myself and give the rest to my neighbour, who you don't know, but really needs your money to help him build a new extension on his house and then try to convince yourself that you've got a good deal. Both me and my neighbour would appreciate your generosity but will get really nasty with you if you decide you don't like this arrangement and decide to stop paying us.

I very much doubt any of those countries will be in the EU soon. The EU is in no mood to expand. In matter of fact, I sometimes wonder if they would kick countries like Greece out if they could. I can see a redimension of the EU budget after Brexit with some countries having to live with less while others having to fork more. It would be a blow, but its manageable.

Regarding the UK I can see the EU offering some concessions but at a very high price. That's what it does to Norway and Switzerland and unlike the UK they are seen as partners. The UK will have to pay, because no country can afford being cut off by an entire continent that they are part off.

Its too early to say what's going to happen. I doubt the UK will enjoy a similar deal to that offered to member states. Soon enough Trump will also go, replaced probably by a pro EU US president. That's bad news for Brexiters.
 
I very much doubt any of those countries will be in the EU soon. The EU is in no mood to expand. In matter of fact, I sometimes wonder if they would kick countries like Greece out if they could. I can see a redimension of the EU budget after Brexit with some countries having to live with less while others having to fork more. It would be a blow, but its manageable.

Regarding the UK I can see the EU offering some concessions but at a very high price. That's what it does to Norway and Switzerland and unlike the UK they are seen as partners. The UK will have to pay, because no country can afford being cut off by an entire continent that they are part off.

Its too early to say what's going to happen. I doubt the UK will enjoy a similar deal to that offered to member states. Soon enough Trump will also go, replaced probably by a pro EU US president. That's bad news for Brexiters.

No wonder people don't buy as many newspapers as they used to, they can get it all from devilish in advance.
 
No wonder people don't buy as many newspapers as they used to, they can get it all from devilish in advance.

I will be very surprised if a 74 year old Trump will win next election. Unless of course the democrats aren't stupid enough to try and bring forward Clinton again
 
It's amazing how Brexiters complain about all these immigrants not being able to speak English. A lot of Dutch people speak English well, this is not the case with a lot of other nationalities

wtf, lack of english from asia is a complaint I've heard, not from the EU ffs.
 
I very much doubt any of those countries will be in the EU soon. The EU is in no mood to expand. In matter of fact, I sometimes wonder if they would kick countries like Greece out if they could. I can see a redimension of the EU budget after Brexit with some countries having to live with less while others having to fork more. It would be a blow, but its manageable.

Regarding the UK I can see the EU offering some concessions but at a very high price. That's what it does to Norway and Switzerland and unlike the UK they are seen as partners. The UK will have to pay, because no country can afford being cut off by an entire continent that they are part off.

Its too early to say what's going to happen. I doubt the UK will enjoy a similar deal to that offered to member states. Soon enough Trump will also go, replaced probably by a pro EU US president. That's bad news for Brexiters.

And to Wolfman....

Perhaps you're right about those three countries not joining too soon, but I was trying to explain the poblems of the three countries who most want to join and will probably be the next ones to join but the problems that that would bring.

The EU directly caused the current problems in the Ukraine by openly encouraging Ukraine to turn its back on Russia and join the EU while forgetting and/or ignoring and/or dimissing ( take your pick ) the fact that the is a large minority of ethnic and Russian speaking Ukranians whose allegience and culture and language is Russian. And is why these ethnic Russians then ' invited ' Putin imto their region in South East Ukraine to preclude them from any future EU membership.

Turkey desperately wants to convert its current EU ' Preferred Trading Partner ' and membership of the Customs Union status into full membership. And arch EU supporter Cameron several times said he would support any application for Turkey to join the EU. Strange that the EU is happy to provide the ' Preferred Trading Partner ' status and membership of the Customs Union on Turkey but doesn't seem to want to give these to the UK after BREXIT, no ?

And Morocco ? Well, the EU has already given Morocco almost € 1.5 billion ( I'll repeat that - € 1.5 billion ) specifically to help Morocco prepare for EU membership. So why give so much money if a membership invitation isn't already prepared and is just waiting to be posted ?

The rest of your thoughts I totally agree with. Although I'll add that the same concerns must exist in EU land that they can't afford to be cut off from the world's fifth / sixth larget economy either....
 
Last edited:
wtf, lack of english from asia is a complaint I've heard, not from the EU ffs.

You haven't heard about people moaning about Poles, Bulgarians etc but you have heard about people moaning about those from ex-British colonies, but I thought the Commonwealth was the UK's target markets. So what is the problem with EU immigrants whereas according to Nick, it's not the numbers that are the problem but the diversity of the nationalities. More Nepalese I say
 
Morocco is part of the ENP, they aren't in Europe and their membership has already been ruled out long ago.

Turkey are so far away from complying with the requirements unlikely to be this century

Ukraine are part of DCFTA - membership of Eu blocked by Germany France, Austria , Belgium & Holland
 
Perhaps you're right about those three countries not joining too soon, but I was trying to explain the poblems of the three countries who most want to join and will probably be the next ones to join but the problems that that would bring.

The EU directly caused the current problems in the Ukraine by openly encouraging Ukraine to turn its back on Russia and join the EU while forgetting and/or ignoring and/or dimissing ( take your pick ) the fact that the is a large minority of ethnic and Russian speaking Ukranians whose allegience and culture and language is Russian. And is why these ethnic Russians then ' invited ' Putin imto their region in South East Ukraine to preclude them from any future EU membership.

Turkey desperately wants to convert its current EU ' Preferred Trading Partner ' and membership of the Customs Union status into full membership. And arch EU supporter Cameron several times said he would support any application for Turkey to join the EU. Strange that the EU is happy to provide the ' Preferred Trading Partner ' status and membership of the Customs Union on Turkey but doesn't seem to want to give these to the UK after BREXIT, no ?

And Morocco ? Well, the EU has already given Morocco almost € 1.5 billion ( I'll repeat that - € 1.5 billion ) specifically to help Morocco prepare for EU membership. So why give so much money if a membership invitation isn't already prepared and is just waiting to be posted ?

The rest of your thoughts I totally agree with. Although I'll add that the same concerns must exist in EU land that they can't afford to be cut off from the world's fifth / sixth larget economy either....

Your lack of knowledge and sense is disturbing.
None of these countries will ever get a membership, neither was it the EU's goal in Ukraine to get them towards a EU membership. Your analysis of the Ukranian conflict indicates you have rather interesting views about national independence in trade and foreign policy.

Your statements about Marocco are just straight up lies you either tell knowingly or by using really, really shitty sources. Even a pre-pre-eliminary status was dienied to Marocco in 1987 already, nothing has changed since then and neither side tried to change that status.
 
Just to share informations it was 1.5bn dirhams not Euros and it's part of the EU neighborood policy.
 
Your lack of knowledge and sense is disturbing.
None of these countries will ever get a membership, neither was it the EU's goal in Ukraine to get them towards a EU membership. Your analysis of the Ukranian conflict indicates you have rather interesting views about national independence in trade and foreign policy.

Your statements about Marocco are just straight up lies you either tell knowingly or by using really, really shitty sources. Even a pre-pre-eliminary status was dienied to Marocco in 1987 already, nothing has changed since then and neither side tried to change that status.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morocco–European_Union_relations

Add them up - almost € 1.5 billion since the original 1987 decision.

https://jamestown.org/program/brussels-ready-to-work-with-yanukovych-for-ukraine/
 
Just to share informations it was 1.5bn dirhams not Euros and it's part of the EU neighborood policy.

I think not....

Financial protocols (1977–1996)
Under the four financial protocols of the 1976 Cooperation Agreement[10] signed between the European Community (predecessor of the EU) and Morocco, Morocco received a total of €1091 million, including €574 million from the Community budget and of €518 million in the form of loans from EIB own resources. The protocols gave sectoral priority to rural development (46%). Other sectors of activity were, in order of importance: economic infrastructure (17%), the social sector (15.6%), the private sector (10%), vocational training (10%) and civil society (0.4%).

MEDA programme
The Meda programme (adopted in July 1996) is the EU's principal financial instrument for the implementation of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership. The budgetary resources allocated under Meda were €3.4 billion for 1995–1999 and €5.4 billion for 2000-2006. Morocco has become the principal beneficiary of the Meda programme, with commitments totalling €1.472 million for 1995–2006, of which €660 million under Meda I (1995–1999) and €812 million under Meda II (2000–2006).[11]
 
You haven't heard about people moaning about Poles, Bulgarians etc but you have heard about people moaning about those from ex-British colonies, but I thought the Commonwealth was the UK's target markets. So what is the problem with EU immigrants whereas according to Nick, it's not the numbers that are the problem but the diversity of the nationalities. More Nepalese I say
No, they generally have excellent English language skills.
 
I'm not saying they don't, but as Sweet Square said, that's not the problem.

By the way, I would appreciate when Brits go abroad, at least make an attempt to speak the language.


lol, why are you pointing this at me? I've lived abroad for a few years, and speak a foreign language.
 
I see nothing in that article that indicates they are being prepared for membership

Read again....


Political cooperation

In 2006 EU commissioner for external relations, Benita Ferrero-Waldner declared that "we [EU] already have a very, very close relationship with Morocco, and we're studying giving them even more advanced status."[12]

In 2008, Morocco was the first country in the region to be granted advanced status, which makes it a pioneer in the European Neighbourhood Policy. The agreement constitutes a "roadmap" which widens the sphere of EU-Morocco bilateral relations by setting out new objectives in three main areas: closer political relations, with the holding of a periodic EU-Morocco summit and the establishment of consultation mechanisms at ministerial level; integration of the single market on the basis of gradual adoption of the Community acquis and sectoral cooperation; and a focus on the human dimension.

The first EU-Morocco summit was held March 7, 2010. It was the first in its kind between the EU and an Arab or African country.[13] Abbas El Fassi, Van Rompuy and Barroso presented to the press the results of the summit, commending the event which heralds a new era in the privileged and strategic partnership. The Granada summit between the European Union and Morocco has concluded with a positive assessment of the development of their relations and with the commitment to build on their political, economic and social aspect, as well as to begin a process of reflection on their future ‘contractual’ form. On bilateral partnership, the joint declaration sets concrete measures to consolidate achievements and an operational agenda for the future, as part of the advanced status which specifies the relation between Morocco and the EU. The summit also addressed the state of EU-Morocco relations and future developments, as well as other subjects of common interest such as the Legal status of Western Sahara, the situation in the Maghreb and the Sahel, and the Union for the Mediterranean.

European Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy Štefan Füle visited Morocco in January 2012. He said he was very pleased with the reform developments and the country is going in the right direction, but some improvements still need to be made and the Nation are currently working on it.
 
I hope you're right.

None of the country you mentioned are going to join anytime soon, if ever. I would be against it but the next countries are among Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, Macedonia, Kosovo and Bosnia.