MoBeats
Conspiracy Buff
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2005
- Messages
- 3,079
We're probably going to need an overhaul the way things are going if he stays. He's going to have lost the dressing room by the end of the season it looks like.
We went out with dire performances for what seemed like a decade under SAF....before he found his "rhythm".......
The problem isn't getting knocked out by Sevilla...
The problem is that the Sevilla match will be seen as symptomatic by those who are skeptical about Jose (I won't talk about those who simply detest him). We treated an inferior (nobody buys the idea that Sevilla are actually a very good side) opponent with far too much respect/caution over two legs and lost – that's what the skeptics will say – as a result of this. The same thing, or something very similar, has happened before – his Chelsea side were knocked out because they were inexplicably afraid to simply kill their opponent, who was begging for it, off.
Main reason is that his dream team, the style of play he wants to build towards given unlimited funds is not something I want at United. Always reactive to other teams tactics, not how you can destroy them and be the best outright.
Say Mourinho gets the boot at the end of next season, i still think we would be in a better position than when we were before this. Despite his style being unpleasant to the eyes, his dealings in the transfer market so far has been pretty good. So, if we lose the man, we definitely won't be going through another transition.Main reason is that his dream team, the style of play he wants to build towards given unlimited funds is not something I want at United. Always reactive to other teams tactics, not how you can destroy them and be the best outright.
Judging by his comments in the CNN interview, Mourinho doesn't understand (or is pretending to) that this defeat is down to the methods he employs. If he doesn't understand, or care, what is the point of letting him spend more money on his type of players? Why put up with his embarrassing behaviour (as we've witnessed post Sevilla), or his obvious lack of judgment when it comes to certain players?Exactly - I can remember us getting knocked out of Europe by a whole host of "inferior" sides during Fergie's reign. The problem with the Sevilla game wasn't that we lost, that happens. It's that over the two legs, against a side with (at the time at least) a negative goal difference in La Liga) we showed no ambition and no willingness to attack them. Instead, we treated them like a stronger side, letting them have the ball and just sitting off. It was pathetic to watch, and Sevilla quite deserved to go through over the two legs
The problem isn't getting knocked out by Sevilla. We've been knocked out by relatively speaking poor (or at least poorer – than us) teams before, and anything can happen in a knockout tournament, etc. Anyone with a modicum of sense realizes this and it doesn't have to be pointed out as if it were something people haven't considered.
The problem is that the Sevilla match will be seen as symptomatic by those who are skeptical about Jose (I won't talk about those who simply detest him). We treated an inferior (nobody buys the idea that Sevilla are actually a very good side) opponent with far too much respect/caution over two legs and lost – that's what the skeptics will say – as a result of this. The same thing, or something very similar, has happened before – his Chelsea side were knocked out because they were inexplicably afraid to simply kill their opponent, who was begging for it, off.
It's not a so-called knee-jerk reaction to an isolated result but rather legitimate (in my opinion) concern (certainly also the usual overreactions, which are less legitimate, but the pro-Mou segment on here shouldn't pretend that everyone who “moans” about the manager are raving “haters”) over José's approach to certain games.
Since the Seville game there has been an explosion of threads about Mourinho. A lot of them have content that address concerns and were being made by posters well before the Seville game. Those concerns would still have been legitimate if we had gone through or not as one performance won't mask underlying ills. I have concerns about Mourinho too, but I had these far before the Seville game and the general hyper-bole since is exactly that. I'd give him far more time as I think we are nowhere near the position that Moyes and Van Gaal had got us and that while we are miles off where we could be, I can see progress away from that.
My point is that every team goes through transitional phases, this year we may have taken a step back from last year but maybe its what we need to do. The 'knee-jerkers' either didn't see SAF have low points before his great United teams or are conveniently forgetting that because they like their shiny new Seville sized stick to beat Mourinho with, because he has an ego and is pragmatic, is not SAF and will be forever 'anti-football' with him in charge.
As I said, I don't believe the club is broken like 'a lot' (not all) of people are seeming to suggest based on the state of some posters (not all) since one match and a couple of press conferences less than two weeks ago.
It's mind-boggling that we have a manager that wins trophies wherever he goes, and we want him out. This fanbase has no clue at all. Our foundations are solid and almost impenetrable. For the next 2 seasons, we can start building the attack. What don't people get?
Yeah I agree. Not saying he's flopped, just that going forward, I don't see him sitting well ever with the club. We have a very good squad of players imo and a team with the likes of De gea, Valencia, bailly, matic, herrera, pogba, martial, rashford, mata, lingard, sanchez and lukaku under the right manager could play brilliant stuff. Some holes like not knowing who the clear CB partner or the left back problem, and midfield not quite being balanced, but we could still play much better stuff with loads of other managers.Say Mourinho gets the boot at the end of next season, i still think we would be in a better position than when we were before this. Despite his style being unpleasant to the eyes, his dealings in the transfer market so far has been pretty good. So, if we lose the man, we definitely won't be going through another transition.
Exactly - I can remember us getting knocked out of Europe by a whole host of "inferior" sides during Fergie's reign. The problem with the Sevilla game wasn't that we lost, that happens. It's that over the two legs, against a side with (at the time at least) a negative goal difference in La Liga) we showed no ambition and no willingness to attack them. Instead, we treated them like a stronger side, letting them have the ball and just sitting off. It was pathetic to watch, and Sevilla quite deserved to go through over the two legs
Definitely another season before I can make a judgement. If we can consolidate 2nd, that is improvement. We can't have seriously believed we could mount a ECL challenge this season - but the manner in which we capitulated at home to Sevilla was admittedly disappointing. I have to believe that the manager and players will get to the bottom of what went wrong (something must have; securing a goalless draw away from home only to come back and play like it was Soccer Aid surely wasn't on the white board), and sort it for next year. I am a little concerned about the general direction of travel - I can't see what we're building towards. Mourinho has not galvanised a team - on the contrary, he seems to be marginalising good players and in a very public, ugly manner. I don't profess to know or understand what goes on behind the scenes, but we (as many have posted) seem to be a collection of individuals on the pitch who lack the belief and determination of a Burnley, Palace or Leicester when we take on a top four rival. Some might call it enigmatic - but it has the hallmarks of intolerance and horrendous man management, and could be very costly for us. I fully accept that City have been different class this season, and that has been inconvenient for Mourinho, but I'd be grateful if he kept a lid on it in press conferences - he's coming across like a spoiled child, not like a Man Utd manager. I don't expect him to be a good loser (SAF wasn't on many occasions), but let's keep the whining to a minimum eh? We've had £300M to spend in the last couple of seasons - that's 'heritage'.
Since the Seville game there has been an explosion of threads about Mourinho. A lot of them have content that address concerns and were being made by posters well before the Seville game. Those concerns would still have been legitimate if we had gone through or not as one performance won't mask underlying ills. I have concerns about Mourinho too, but I had these far before the Seville game and the general hyper-bole since is exactly that. I'd give him far more time as I think we are nowhere near the position that Moyes and Van Gaal had got us and that while we are miles off where we could be, I can see progress away from that.
My point is that every team goes through transitional phases, this year we may have taken a step back from last year but maybe its what we need to do. The 'knee-jerkers' either didn't see SAF have low points before his great United teams or are conveniently forgetting that because they like their shiny new Seville sized stick to beat Mourinho with, because he has an ego and is pragmatic, is not SAF and will be forever 'anti-football' with him in charge.
As I said, I don't believe the club is broken like 'a lot' (not all) of people are seeming to suggest based on the state of some posters (not all) since one match and a couple of press conferences less than two weeks ago.
Truth is all this things were there before the Seville game and MUFC fans watch only results. 2nd half vs Liverpool was appalling but people only cared we won. This is Jose, and when he's not winning with his non-soccer, it's always very heated. Seville was only an eye opener not a one off
He is a has been.Living on past reputation.With the funds he has at his disposal he has done poorly.Look at Pep