Celtic Appoint Ronny Deila As New Manager

You cannot have a sliding scale for errors, where do you draw the line for serious error or slight error, they made a terrible terrible mistake and they are going to have to live with it.
How do you come to that conclusion? You HAVE to have a sliding scale otherwise you end up in situation where you hand out identical punishment for two disproportionate crimes. In normal life you have this, in football you need to have it to some extent as well.
 
I don't know why you are so sure. Nobody else seems to think so.Rules have been broken, the relevant sanctions have been applied. CAS are unlikely to tell uefa that their rules are crap and should be ignored. As it happens on a footballing front I would not be unhappy at all if Legia were reinstated, I am all for the best team going through, I just can't see how it can happen, uefa would be opening up a massive can of worms if they let Legia back in.
I'm not sure. I have no idea. But it seems to me that there is a high chance that one of these things might be true:

1) There is a badly translated section which caused the confusion which led to the player being improperly registered.
2) The CAS will rule that, as Legia intended to comply with the rules (the player did not play the relevant games) and did not know the rules were being broken, the punishment does not fit the crime. This is why it is different to that Swiss team ignoring UEFA's rules and playing illegible players for half a season. Legia tried to comply with the rules.
3) The player's participation did not affect the result in any way. He came on with a few minutes to go, with Celtic having little to no hope of entertaining a come back. The punishment therefore doesn't fit the crime.
4) The player was punished. The club not using him for the relevant matches was punishment, regardless of his name being down on the squad sheet.

Basically, I can't think of a situation where the punishment would stand. The only one of relative equality might be Milan failing to put a player in the "B squad" and instead putting him in their "A squad" for the Champions League last year. Because they did that, another player was denied the chance to join the A squad (who couldn't join the B squad), and participate in the Champions League.

West Ham with Tevez and Mascherano? Completely different. But remember this:

In April 2007, West Ham admitted to breaching Premier League rules B13 and U18. Rule B13 states that all Premier League clubs should act in good faith, while U18 relates to third party influence. The commission fined West Ham £5.5 million, but did not dock the club points.

The Premier League also allowed Carlos Tevez to continue playing. Sheffield United were unsuccessful in appealing this decision with both a Premier League independent commission and the High Court. They then took the matter up through the FA's arbitration procedure last August. The ruling in Sheffield United's favour was released to the two clubs last Friday.

A directions hearing will be held next week and it is expected to be several months before the arbitration panel rules on any final compensation figure. Sheffield United want just over £30 million. However, with West Ham now exploring other available legal options, such as appealing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) or even Fifa, the already interminable fall-out from their signings of Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano could now easily continue into next year.

What is CAS?

The Court of Arbitration for Sport is an international arbitration body set up to settle disputes related to sports. Its headquarters are in Lausanne. It was originally conceived by International Olympic Committee President Juan Antonio Samaranch to deal with disputes arising during the Olympics. It was established as part of the IOC in 1984. Ten years later, CAS underwent reforms to make itself more independent of the IOC, both organisationally and financially.

Rule K5c

Rule K is the FA procedure by which clubs can have a dispute heard by an independent arbitration tribunal. However, even though West Ham had no choice but to accept the arbitration process, Rule K5c would suggest that the decision is binding.

It says that by signing up to arbitration, "the parties shall be deemed to have waived irrevocably any right to appeal, review or any recourse to a court of law."

So did Tevez make a difference?

- Key games

It is clearly a subjective question, but the key period was the final 10 matches of the season, when Tevez scored seven times. Until then, he had not scored for West Ham. His goals could be argued to have changed the results in the 2-1 win against Blackburn, the 3-1 victory against Bolton and the 1-0 win against Manchester United.

So, even with Tevez and Mascherano, even though West Ham clearly broke the rules.. they weren't simply handed 3-0 losses for every time the two players played. They weren't simply relegated next season. And again, that wasn't an Admin error. That was a very serious breach of the rules.

What about all those transfers that go past the deadline? How often has FIFA/UEFA allowed them because they "tried to submit the paperwork in time but the fax machine was broken".

The player WAS punished. Using the player didnt affect the result. It was a simple admin error. The club intended to comply. "Not knowing the rules is no excuse," but attempting to comply with them usually does get you some leeway.
 
How do you come to that conclusion? You HAVE to have a sliding scale otherwise you end up in situation where you hand out identical punishment for two disproportionate crimes. In normal life you have this, in football you need to have it to some extent as well.
Alright I should not have said that, my point is that the rules are the rules at the start. If the punishment is stated in the rulebook at the start of the competition for fielding an illegible player there is not much that can be done when that rule is breached other than hand down the set punishment. You cannot set that punishment aside because it was only a slight breach of the rule. If they set this aside this time for what is admittedly an innocuous breach then it would set a precedent for other clubs to challange the rule for what might be more serious breaches. Then who how do you decide where the line for serious and not so serious errors and the severity of the punishments dished out for them should be determined? Much better to have a very clear rule, any breach for whatever reason and this is the punishment so get your ducks in a row folks. This is professional sport involving millions not tiddly winks.
 
No, I think it is unfair because verifying on the pitch scoreline for an administrative error is daft.

You bringing the away goal into equation for the millionth time almost makes me think that you somehow believe Celtic have earned their progress.

I don't think we earned our progress. I bring the away goal up all the time because that's what puts us through and Legia out. It wasn't the punishment from UEFA which put Legia out.
 
I find it funny how everybody in Europe will now presumably cheer against Celtic in every match they play simply for having the the audacity to do... well, nothing, really.

Ah, wait, now I get it. You all want us to pull out of Europe and "let football win", which, of course, would give Maribor a bye into the group stages. That would make an awful lot of sense and would of course be justice for Legia Warsaw, a team who cruelly suffered the same fate that every team before them has done. A team who were so wronged by the application of the rules that football's been tainted forever now.

Go Maribor! A team with a part of it's stadium shut because of racist fans, go you!
 
I find it funny how everybody in Europe will now presumably cheer against Celtic in every match they play simply for having the the audacity to do... well, nothing, really.

Ah, wait, now I get it. You all want us to pull out of Europe and "let football win", which, of course, would give Maribor a bye into the group stages. That would make an awful lot of sense and would of course be justice for Legia Warsaw, a team who cruelly suffered the same fate that every team before them has done. A team who were so wronged by the application of the rules that football's been tainted forever now.

Go Maribor! A team with a part of it's stadium shut because of racist fans, go you!
If Celtic had done that wouldn't they have been sued by the shareholders anyway? Corporate governance laws and all that.
 
I find it funny how everybody in Europe will now presumably cheer against Celtic in every match they play simply for having the the audacity to do... well, nothing, really.

Ah, wait, now I get it. You all want us to pull out of Europe and "let football win", which, of course, would give Maribor a bye into the group stages. That would make an awful lot of sense and would of course be justice for Legia Warsaw, a team who cruelly suffered the same fate that every team before them has done. A team who were so wronged by the application of the rules that football's been tainted forever now.

Go Maribor! A team with a part of it's stadium shut because of racist fans, go you!

I find it funny you expect the reaction to be anything else. You were thrashed, went through on a technicality and you expect support?!

You keep bring up racist fans as if that somehow makes Celtic sliming into the CL more palatable - they're completely different issues.
 
I find it funny you expect the reaction to be anything else. You were thrashed, went through on a technicality and you expect support?!

You keep bring up racist fans as if that somehow makes Celtic sliming into the CL more palatable - they're completely different issues.
Aye Celtic were trashed but why are they even being blamed for an error by Legia? Legia stuffed it up and Celtic had nothing to do with it but flukely progress on away goals because of it.
 
I find it funny you expect the reaction to be anything else. You were thrashed, went through on a technicality and you expect support?!

You keep bring up racist fans as if that somehow makes Celtic sliming into the CL more palatable - they're completely different issues.

I don't expect support. I just don't understand the complete opposite and actively cheering against us now when in the past people would've looked at Maribor v Celtic and not bothered their arse. Shouldn't people's issue and anger be directed at UEFA and their rulebook rather than Celtic who did absolutely nothing wrong?

I bring up racist fans in this instance because I find it alarming that people would rather see a team in trouble for racism win than a team who benefited from UEFA's rulebook.
 
Last edited:
Eh? Moral high ground isn't a bloody verb. What does that even mean?
Obviously meant take the moral high ground. Pink moon keeps mentioning racist fans from both legia and Maribor for some reason when it's obviously a minority in the same way a minority of Celtic fans behave similarly.
 
I'm not sure Celtic fans can ever moral high ground over any other set of fans.

I'm not claiming the moral high ground.

I'm fed up with posts like that though. That's the kind of thing that every non Celtic or Rangers supporter north of the border brings up when discussing fans in Scotland. They act like everybody is well behaved and the Old Firm fans shame everyone. Funny though that it was a Hearts fan from Edinburgh who attacked a manager on the touchline. There's one set of fans who'll go to Ibrox and sing about the Ibrox Disaster. It isn't Celtic fans.

They might be a minority within Maribor and Legia, doesn't change the fact that it's absurd to be taking sides in a match you have no connection to and choosing to side with the club who come into the match with a racism charge hanging over their head rather than the club who come into it benefiting from UEFA's application of their rules.
 
Obviously meant take the moral high ground. Pink moon keeps mentioning racist fans from both legia and Maribor for some reason when it's obviously a minority in the same way a minority of Celtic fans behave similarly.
Well then no set of fans can take the moral high ground over any other set of fans as we all have a minority of idiots. I thought you meant they couldn't take the moral high ground due to UEFA penalising Legia in which case I'd ask what moral high ground they were occupying as the issue is between UEFA and Legia and Celtic just benefited from it.
 
I'm not claiming the moral high ground.

I'm fed up with posts like that though. That's the kind of thing that every non Celtic or Rangers supporter north of the border brings up when discussing fans in Scotland. They act like everybody is well behaved and the Old Firm fans shame everyone. Funny though that it was a Hearts fan from Edinburgh who attacked a manager on the touchline. There's one set of fans who'll go to Ibrox and sing about the Ibrox Disaster. It isn't Celtic fans.

They might be a minority within Maribor and Legia, doesn't change the fact that it's absurd to be taking sides in a match you have no connection to and choosing to side with the club who come into the match with a racism charge hanging over their head rather than the club who come into it benefiting from UEFA's application of their rules.

It's just odd to use a minority of a teams fan base as a reason against them.
It's isn't that absurd to support a team that you have no connections to in a case like this. Many, rightly or wrongly, feel Legia were harshly punished and think Celtic don't deserve to be there therefore want Maribor to Win.

On a side note, how do you think you'll get on tonight? Refuse to believe youse will be anywhere near as bad as against Legia but think Maribor won't be pushovers.
 
I'm not claiming the moral high ground.

I'm fed up with posts like that though. That's the kind of thing that every non Celtic or Rangers supporter north of the border brings up when discussing fans in Scotland. They act like everybody is well behaved and the Old Firm fans shame everyone. Funny though that it was a Hearts fan from Edinburgh who attacked a manager on the touchline. There's one set of fans who'll go to Ibrox and sing about the Ibrox Disaster. It isn't Celtic fans.
As dirty as I feel agreeing with a Celtic fan, it does get on my tits the way some of the fans of the others clubs in Scotland pretend their supports are some sort of bastion of impeccable morality. Whereas we all have our share of prejudiced and distasteful cnuts, like any support in any country.
 
I'm fed up with posts like that though. That's the kind of thing that every non Celtic or Rangers supporter north of the border brings up when discussing fans in Scotland. They act like everybody is well behaved and the Old Firm fans shame everyone. Funny though that it was a Hearts fan from Edinburgh who attacked a manager on the touchline. There's one set of fans who'll go to Ibrox and sing about the Ibrox Disaster. It isn't Celtic fans.

As dirty as I feel agreeing with a Celtic fan, it does get on my tits the way some of the fans of the others clubs in Scotland pretend their supports are some sort of bastion of impeccable morality. Whereas we all have our share of prejudiced and distasteful cnuts, like any support in any country.

Oh jesus, get a room you two!
 
On a side note, how do you think you'll get on tonight? Refuse to believe youse will be anywhere near as bad as against Legia but think Maribor won't be pushovers.

Hard to tell. Depends which Celtic turn up really. Legia away was the worst Celtic performance I've ever seen. Dundee United at home was probably the best (at least football wise) I've seen us play in at least 4 or 5 years. It's Celtic away in Europe though, there's sure to be a few defensive calamities at some point. I'd be surprised if we won tonight though.
 
Back to Mr Deila!!!!!!!

Celtic may have earned a reprieve to qualify for this round after a 6-1 aggregate defeat to Legia Warsaw, but coach Ronny Deila is in no mood to be coy on his team's capabilities.

"If we play our way we can beat anybody," the Norwegian said ahead of his side's play-off first leg against Slovenian side Maribor. "The players are fitter and sharper, so I expect a much better performance in Maribor than against Legia several weeks ago."

In fairness, Celtic did enjoy a very impressive 6-1 win over Dundee at the weekend, and Deila says he expects his side to rise to tonight's occasion.

"This is a big challenge for both clubs and it is also a big game for me personally as I have never been to the Champions League before," he said. "It's an exciting time for me, but if we ultimately can't beat Maribor then we don't deserve the Champions League."
:lol:
 
:lol:

Wonder if they can find a way in despite this.
 
Christ this new Celtic manager is Moyes in disguise......The Celtic gig would actually be the perfect job for Moyes once they've sacked Delia....Celtic is Moyes level as a manager and he would do well there
 
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Peter Lawell and co will be going through the team sheets and small details with a fine tooth comb just now
 
Terrible performance from Celtic, and Maribor weren't much better. Players like Mulgrew, Stokes, Ambrose, Berget, etc play at a level that suits lower league football. Ambrose is a terrible defender; Mulgrew is cumbersome, slow of thought, one-footed, lacks stamina, but on top of all of those faults believes that he's a good footballer, while guys like Johansen, Stokes, Berget are limited footballers that shouldn't be involved in CL qualifiers.

Despite giving the ball away on a number of occasions and showing poor decision making at times I was impressed by the energy and workrate of Callum McGregor. His confidence and forward runs were the only positive for Celtic this evening. I think he'll thrive under Gordon Strachan and possibly develop into an important player for the Scottish national team (he's just been called up for the senior team). He needs to develop the technical side of his game, and in order to do that he might be better off seeking a move abroad, perhaps to Germany, Belgium or Holland.
 
Terrible performance from Celtic, and Maribor weren't much better. Players like Mulgrew, Stokes, Ambrose, Berget, etc play at a level that suits lower league football. Ambrose is a terrible defender; Mulgrew is cumbersome, slow of thought, one-footed, lacks stamina, but on top of all of those faults believes that he's a good footballer, while guys like Johansen, Stokes, Berget are limited footballers that shouldn't be involved in CL qualifiers.

Spot on.

The board should be sacked for this. Sell guys like Ki, Wanyama, Hooper and Forster and replace them with absolute nobodies because you're too tight to spend any of the money you're rolling in. Unacceptable way to run a football club.

Deila is out of his depth at a club this size. Tactically clueless tonight and not for the first time have I had to say that.

I can only imagine Mulgrew has dirt on someone high up at Celtic. Two managers (admittedly shit managers) have shoehorned him into the team and into midfield at that. The guy's a defender and it's painfully obvious when he plays. Like you say, thinks he's better than he is! He tries to play like he's some kind of Pirlo or Gerrard deep lying midfielder when in reality he's just awful. Ambrose is genuinely the worst defender I've ever seen at this club. Like Mulgrew he seems to be undroppable. It's soul destroying.

Ambrose, Mulgrew, Stokes, Johansen, Berget, Commons, Griffiths, Balde, Pukki, Boerrigter, Ronny Deila & Peter Lawwell. There's more I could add, believe me. I'd genuinely celebrate if they were never associated with Celtic again. Especially the last one. How he can survive this with his job intact astounds me.
 
You don't give up on a €10m you get for qualifying for group stages etc. :lol:
 
Christ this new Celtic manager is Moyes in disguise......The Celtic gig would actually be the perfect job for Moyes once they've sacked Delia....Celtic is Moyes level as a manager and he would do well there
Imagine when DM wins the CL next year :D