The Firestarter
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 29,162
What a collection of managers on dispaly in the PL next season. Can't wait for the next season.
Van Gaal wasn't the same though. The same in the sense that they both performed well enough and had high expectations coming into a new league. But Conte's Italy team looks tactically much better than Van Gaals Holland team did.Tactically he's been outstanding in this tournament with a poor Italian side. Though Van Gaal was the same at the World Cup with Holland. Hopefully it goes the same way for Conte.
In whose place?They'll be comfortably top four next season.
In whose place?
Cahill is way too poor on the ball and Terry is no Barzagli; far too slow and struggled already in a back four this season gone.31411
Courtois
Cahill Terry New CB
Matic
Azpilaqueta Box to Box Fabregas New LWB
Hazard
Costa
People should not get carried away.
Van Gaal looked like a tactical be iat the last World Cup.
The truth is that International tournament football is very different from the bread and butter stuff.
That said I think he's a great coach and Chelsea will be strong next season.
Top 4 will be,
Man City, Man Utd, Arsenal and Chelsea in no particular order.
Decent is an understatementPL is a different ball game altogether and cant read too much about tournament performances, granted he is doing well and has been a decent Manager at Juve
Am I the only one that thinks Conte at Italy is different than LVG at the World Cup?
There are similarities, obviously, but I think this Italy team looks a whole lot better tactically, both defensively organized and offensively going forward, than the Holland team did which relied heavily on an amazing Robben (who many thought was the best player at the WC).
I don't think Conte's success (so far) with Italy is a guarantee of anything next season with Chelsea, but I don't think you can write it off as "LVG did the same with holland and sucked with United."
Same.
Holland were awful to watch in the WC bar their thrashing vs Spain. They relied on Robben heavily.
Italy are different. They're cohesive in attack and defense. And they create lots of chances. Conte's done a great job.
Chalk and oranges.Am I the only one that thinks Conte at Italy is different than LVG at the World Cup?
There are similarities, obviously, but I think this Italy team looks a whole lot better tactically, both defensively organized and offensively going forward, than the Holland team did which relied heavily on an amazing Robben (who many thought was the best player at the WC).
I don't think Conte's success (so far) with Italy is a guarantee of anything next season with Chelsea, but I don't think you can write it off as "LVG did the same with holland and sucked with United."
Van Gaal wasn't the same though. The same in the sense that they both performed well enough and had high expectations coming into a new league. But Conte's Italy team looks tactically much better than Van Gaals Holland team did.
Not 10 better players. That's an exaggeration.Besides Robben, Italy have 10 better players.
So it does help. It helps having some of the best defenders in the game currently.
It's not really, he was poor in Europe and that's the main place to judge a Juve manager as they're by far the strongest in the Italian league.Decent is an understatement
Besides Robben, Italy have 10 better players.
So it does help. It helps having some of the best defenders in the game currently.
They were by far the strongest in the league because of Conte. They didn't win the league until he joined.It's not really, he was poor in Europe and that's the main place to judge a Juve manager as they're by far the strongest in the Italian league.
Not 10 better players. That's an exaggeration.
Giaccherini, Pelle, Eder, Bernardeschi, Insigne have all had many minutes and are terrible to average players. They do have a good defense though.
They decimated the league in a way even Mourinho at Inter with more resources couldn't do.It's not really, he was poor in Europe and that's the main place to judge a Juve manager as they're by far the strongest in the Italian league.
The fact Inter were challenging on three fronts could've played a part in that though. Juventus had no European football the year they went unbeaten.They decimated the league in a way even Mourinho at Inter with more resources couldn't do.
How about the year they got 102 points? Or when they went 42 games unbeaten in all competitions? His work there was ridiculous.The fact Inter were challenging on three fronts could've played a part in that though. Juventus had no European football the year they went unbeaten.