David Moyes | West Ham in talks with him for managerial job

Even Fergie would have struggled with that team.

He'd have not been foolish enough to go there in the first place, but would have made sure he'd brought a better bunch of players in, whatever the budget constraints.

Some of Moyes' signings were as if we were still a decade ago
 
I think Pulis and Allardyce would have kept them up, but not without a struggle. They are still a terribly run club. Don't get me wrong, I think Moyes would take Barcelona out of the CL places in Spain...

Yeah I think the big problem with Moyes is that he's a wholly uninspiring individual. Not a redeeming quality where leadership is concerned. So I struggle to see how any players would really want to play for him or listen to what he as to say even.
 
Felt sorry for O'Shea there - he's a good bloke - but I am glad Moyes has now been shown up beyond dispute for being a poor manager and a self-serving, passive aggressive, generally unpleasant cnut.

It was only three years ago....I'd find it easier to understand a quantum physics lecture (in Chinese) than how this joker ever ended up at United.

Ott. But a russian learns Quantum physics in Chinese? Lol
 
Jesus Christ. Yes he was. Comfortably better. Just a far cry from the Ferguson era and not good enough for moving forward.

Moyes' appointment and subsequent nightmare season will be talked about for decades, I guarantee it. It one of the most bizarre and unjustified job offers in modern football. I'm just waiting to hear about the movie script for it.

It was the way we arrogantly made such noise about how we were going to get the succession plan right, and listed the experience needed, winning stuff, major European experience etc.
Then somehow gave it to a guy with zero experience of anything bar upper midtable finished for a team of battlers.
 
He won that ages before appointed to manage Real. I agree that it's better than Moyes to United, but still felt strange.

Well, he also did a fairly good job with Chelsea. He won the Europa and steadied the ship. Seeing Benitez at championship was far more strange than him in Real. Benitez as a tactician he is amazing. The problem is that after a point he loses the players, which makes him a second tier manager and not world class. That happened in Inter and Real. I think he is really alike with LVG. Benitez can achieve a lot in international football, where the personal ties with the players usually dont interrupt his job.

Moyes on other hand, quoting Paul Merson, wouldnt win the league with Olympiakos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Akshay
It was the way we arrogantly made such noise about how we were going to get the succession plan right, and listed the experience needed, winning stuff, major European experience etc.
Then somehow gave it to a guy with zero experience of anything bar upper midtable finished for a team of battlers.


I'm actually starting to believe that we did speak to whole host of managers but either they already moved to another club or like Klopp they didn't want to move to us.
 
Ott. But a russian learns Quantum physics in Chinese? Lol

I'm not Russian but you get the point. As for Moyes, although I never really rated him as a manager, I used to think he was a decent guy. The more I read though, the more unpleasant he seems - journos in Preston who hate him from his early days (and this is from sleepy regional press like the Lancashire Evening Telegraph), the stories that he was unpopular with the support staff at United, the slap incident with that female reporter...It creates a picture of someone very good at managing upwards but a prick with people that he does not have to be nice with.
 
I think you significantly underestimate the damage Moyes did with his completely defeatist approach, clueless appointments and general sourness. That meant LVG had to pick up the pieces. Something Jose is still in the process of doing (and very well I may add), as well as fixing what LVG did, which was to compound the misery by telling the players not to be themselves, whatever they do.

It was one season. Teams have bad seasons. Finished 7th and were out of the CL, then the following year, we were back in it. Chelsea finished 15th last season and may win the title this one. It's too easy to blame Moyes.

You go on like Moyes changed the whole team. He made four signings, two of which who were main stays under Van Gaal and still under Mourinho - those players being Mata and Fellaini. I'd also like to add that, although Herrera was signed under Van Gaal, Moyes made that happen. Same applies to Shaw.

I just think there's a lot of people who like to be over dramatic when it comes to Moyes. He was poor, and was rightly sacked, but it really isn't as bad as some make out.

If anything, having Van Gaal, especially for two seasons, was much more detrimental to our team than Moyes.

1) His style of play was a style we're not used to, i.e. slow build up, organised, possession, etc, whereas at least Moyes had a similar approach to Sir Alex, i.e. getting it wide, crosses, counter.

2) He also had the players like 'robots' using the quote from Schneiderlin, which, as you said, meant the players couldn't be themselves.

3) Made rash decisions and got rid of players who could still be very useful today, i.e. Welbeck, Keane, Hernandez.

4) Signings didn't work. Di Maria, Schneiderlin, Schweinstieger, Darmian, Depay, Valdes and Falcao turned out to be poor signings by Van Gaal.


Having said that, like I said, I still believe we have a good enough team to be challenging for the title, and had it not been for all those draws, we would be. It's all too easy to blame it on past managers.
 
I'm actually starting to believe that we did speak to whole host of managers but either they already moved to another club or like Klopp they didn't want to move to us.

Yep, pure brave facing it. Then repackaging it as being some sort of "we're a proper club, different to all the managerial merry go round clubs".
And as it became clearer it was a disaster, Fergie himself kept re-adjusting his take on it, to try and act like it was last resort material. Much much different from all the bluster about him being the right stock, going round his house to tell him he was THE man etc etc.
 
Real Madrid go through a lot of coaches though and Benitez has a decent record - maybe not A list but he certainly has some talent.

United, on the other hand, was a club built around a "manager", and they replaced an absolutely ruthless winner (as demonstrated even before he pitched up at United in 1986) with a 50 year old without a trophy to his name. I am probably repeating myself but there is no way United would have appointed a 50 year old foreign manager with an allergy to silverware and who had spent 10 years keeping the likes of Torino or Real Betis in the top 10 of their league. Sentimentality and perverse pride in doing things differently trumped common sense.

Come here to laugh at Moyes and this is the first post I read, very well put! I couldn't believe it at the time and still can't, the acceptance to it was crazy too, I know it's the past but damn, it's one of the craziest things I've seen a top club do! The only thing Moyes has in common with SAF is the fact he's Scottish, Fergie is a completely different beast.

Hopefully that's the last we'll see if Moyes in the top flight, he really doesn't offer anything to a club, he's weak willed and he shows it.
 
12-13 39 points
13-14 38 points
14-15 38 points
15-16 39 points
16-17 21 points

Your defence of Moyes is ridiculous. They've always managed to fight till the end and get close to 40 points but they've been dead and buried under Moyes for ages now

I think the £20m+ used on Mcnair, Love, Gibson, Oviedo and Papy Dijlobodji could have been spent better too

My defence of Moyes? I couldn't care less. Just find it funny how people are still blaming him for our lack of success. That's what you call ridiculous!

As I said, they've always been in and around the relegation zone for quite a while.

Fortunately for Sunderland, in the last few years, they've been able to get a manager in late on to give them that boost and get some points on the board. That wasn't the case this season.
 
Just out of curiosity, has there been anyone that's comparable to Moyes getting the United job. I.e. - a total fraud ending up in one the biggest jobs in the world?

Barca and Real have in the past given jobs to people with a lot less experience and accomplishments than Moyes had when he joined United.
 
Barca and Real have in the past given jobs to people with a lot less experience and accomplishments than Moyes had when he joined United.


Did they have the same outcome as Moyes at United?
 
He didn't give himself the job, he was chosen, and did what he could.

I mean, you talk as if we've progressed a lot since he's been sacked.

Van Gaal spent more money and wasn't any better.

The footballs been a bit better under Morunho, but we're still fighting for top four, when we should really be challenging for the title, especially given how much money that was spent in the summer.

Bollocks mate.

4th place CL football, Fa Cup win, and very good record against the top sides. Those are 3 things a spineless cnut like Moyes didn't and would have never been able to achieve.

Van Gaal wasn't a huge success by any stretch but it's complete nonsense to say he was as bad as Moyes. You should be embarrassed to even think that let alone say it.
 
No but, United are far from the first top club to give an outside the box candidate a top job.


What I meant was that Moyes had a largely mediocre career for more than a decade before moving to United. With Madrid it's different as they've appointed managers who were unknown quantity.
 
If he was a horse, he would have been shot already. So glorious to see this tosspot fail in another gig.
 
It was one season. Teams have bad seasons. Finished 7th and were out of the CL, then the following year, we were back in it. Chelsea finished 15th last season and may win the title this one. It's too easy to blame Moyes.

You go on like Moyes changed the whole team. He made four signings, two of which who were main stays under Van Gaal and still under Mourinho - those players being Mata and Fellaini. I'd also like to add that, although Herrera was signed under Van Gaal, Moyes made that happen. Same applies to Shaw.

I just think there's a lot of people who like to be over dramatic when it comes to Moyes. He was poor, and was rightly sacked, but it really isn't as bad as some make out.

If anything, having Van Gaal, especially for two seasons, was much more detrimental to our team than Moyes.

1) His style of play was a style we're not used to, i.e. slow build up, organised, possession, etc, whereas at least Moyes had a similar approach to Sir Alex, i.e. getting it wide, crosses, counter.

2) He also had the players like 'robots' using the quote from Schneiderlin, which, as you said, meant the players couldn't be themselves.

3) Made rash decisions and got rid of players who could still be very useful today, i.e. Welbeck, Keane, Hernandez.

4) Signings didn't work. Di Maria, Schneiderlin, Schweinstieger, Darmian, Depay, Valdes and Falcao turned out to be poor signings by Van Gaal.


Having said that, like I said, I still believe we have a good enough team to be challenging for the title, and had it not been for all those draws, we would be. It's all too easy to blame it on past managers.

I'm not really defending LVG. I'd say we had more belief under LVG but by then, a lot of damage had been done. I'm not sure how comparable the Chelsea scenario is to us replacing a legend with an incompetent manager. I agree that LVG's brand of football simply did not work for us. But I think Moyes, as a character, simply demoralised the whole club. It would not matter what type of football he'd like to play, with the atmosphere he creates it is all rather pointless.

I really struggle to see one redeeming quality in David Moyes. Louis was a nutter and sometimes funny, and he won an actual trophy. The fact LVG wasn't anywhere near to what we needed, doesn't make Moyes any more competent as a top level manager.

It wasn't a "teams have bad seasons". That's not a very accurate analysis. If your leader aspires to be like your rivals, wants to make it tough for much inferior teams, and deals with the press like a lip-sweating-Nixon, you've got the first factor in why "a bad season" occurred.
 
My bad. But to me, after finishing fourth, then making further signings the following season, you should be looking to progress. He didn't!
I agree with that and I think he deserved his sacking. But he still did a better job than Moyes
 
I'm actually starting to believe that we did speak to whole host of managers but either they already moved to another club or like Klopp they didn't want to move to us.
I think Ferguson just really liked Moyes and had him for first choice. This is from February 2012

Manchester United's Sir Alex Ferguson to retire 'in two or three years'


• Regrets missing out on signing Joe Hart at bargain price
• Hails David Moyes's achievements at Everton as 'miraculous'


Sir Alex Ferguson has lauded David Moyes's work at Everton and claimed Manchester United will need an experienced head to replace him as manager when retirement comes in "another two or three years".

The priority for the 70-year-old United manager is to retire on a "winning note" rather than a specific date. He has already shelved one retirement plan a decade ago and subsequently added five more Premier League titles and a Champions League triumph to his honours collection in that time.

As for who could eventually succeed him at Old Trafford, Ferguson said: "We need to go down that road with United. They will need someone with experience," and claimed that even he would struggle if taking the job in 2012 "because of the beast it [the club] is."

He elaborated: " "We've never discussed it. It's a dangerous game. At this moment, there are maybe half a dozen managers doing well in the Premier League. Only half a dozen because all the rest of them are fighting for their lives. Some are doing great jobs with the resources they have and David Moyes has been unbelievable. I put him in the top six because what he's done at Everton has been quite miraculous."

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2012/feb/20/manchester-united-sir-alex-ferguson-retire
 
What I meant was that Moyes had a largely mediocre career for more than a decade before moving to United. With Madrid it's different as they've appointed managers who were unknown quantity.

Barca are more than likely about to give their job to a manager Ernesto Valderde whose only titles are in Greece. And he is replacing Enrique who flopped at Roma and had one decent season at Celta on his own before rejoining Barca.
 
My bad. But to me, after finishing fourth, then making further signings the following season, you should be looking to progress. He didn't!

The league got a lot stranger and definitely more difficult (with the rise of Spurs for example) last year. Leicester won it and we finished above both Liverpool and Chelsea.

LvG was bad, but he was never 'Moyes' bad.
 
If Moyes had any sense he'd do a Keane/Sounness and just go the punditry/coach route. He's fecked his managerial career. I think his ego/insanity won't allow him to do this however.

As an aside when is there going to be a proper piece of journalism on what the feck happened to allow this cnut to become our manager, even without how awful he's been since Old Trafford he never had the credentials to get anywhere near the United job and his impact is still lasting to this day.
 
The Moyes season was terrible but, he did not even last a full season, he only signed two players, Fabio was the only player he sold out right, most of the players he worked with are no longer at the club. So people still should not be blaming him for current issues at the club.
 
It's the board's fault. If only they signed Fábregas, Bale, Kroos and Ronaldo like Moyes wanted, they could have reached mid table.
 
Then finished 5th the season after.

But won the FA Cup.

Moyes would have also been redeemed for that shite clusterfeck of a season if he'd won the FA Cup.

LvG still lost his job and rightfully so, but he lost he job for dropping one league position (on GD) and winning an FA Cup. Moyes lost his job for dropping 6 positions and winning feck all.

And don't get me started on their recorda in the big games.
 
The Moyes season was terrible but, he did not even last a full season, he only signed two players, Fabio was the only player he sold out right, most of the players he worked with are no longer at the club. So people still should not be blaming him for current issues at the club.

Yeah but if we had signed Mourinho that year we would have finished top three. That set us back a year.

I'm not blaming him for anything now. But I'm still amazed how he got the job.
 
Barca are more than likely about to give their job to a manager Ernesto Valderde whose only titles are in Greece. And he is replacing Enrique who flopped at Roma and had one decent season at Celta on his own before rejoining Barca.


Yeah I suppose that's true, and yet Enrique won the Treble at Barca. Of course it's easy to scorn the appointment of Moyes' not that we know what happened.
 
The Moyes season was terrible but, he did not even last a full season, he only signed two players, Fabio was the only player he sold out right, most of the players he worked with are no longer at the club. So people still should not be blaming him for current issues at the club.

Vidic & Evra left due to him, Rooney was signed on an insane contract and the squad seemed to take a hit that they never recovered from.

He is certainly to blame for much of what happened post SAF, LVG too isn't blameless.
 
Vidic & Evra left due to him, Rooney was signed on an insane contract and the squad seemed to take a hit that they never recovered from.

He is certainly to blame for much of what happened post SAF, LVG too isn't blameless.

This is what I think some people often fail to see how him - he's not just shit, he's demoralising. Wasn't there a story about Vidic and Rio leaving a meeting with him and feeling completely bewildered by the experience. It's not just about he who did and didn't sign, it's about him as a person.