marlowe78
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Messages
- 4,624
England definitely added to the muck but that's want Colombia went looking for. The English players were just playing their game the first 15-20 minutes and the Colombian players were acting like twats - Sterling was used like a hobby horse, Henderson butted in the line (though he embellished it), the shoving match with Maguire, etc. As dirty as it was, I think it was a character-building experience for the team, dealing with situations like that help build resolve.
BTW, I was a bit disappointed in Falcao. I've always respected him and you'd think with his abilities and experience he'd be a tad better than that...
I think they will beat Sweden but England badly needs a top-class MF in the coming years (but from where?). Henderson is steady but really nothing beyond that and Dier, fair play on the penalty, but he was a liability up until then. The better teams in the competition have a definitive midfielder that can unlock defenses and England would be so much better if they had someone doing that. They wouldn't, for instance, have to rely on Kane dropping deep so much.
One other thought...THANK YOU GOD that Joe Hart was not taken on board again!
BTW, I was a bit disappointed in Falcao. I've always respected him and you'd think with his abilities and experience he'd be a tad better than that...
I think they will beat Sweden but England badly needs a top-class MF in the coming years (but from where?). Henderson is steady but really nothing beyond that and Dier, fair play on the penalty, but he was a liability up until then. The better teams in the competition have a definitive midfielder that can unlock defenses and England would be so much better if they had someone doing that. They wouldn't, for instance, have to rely on Kane dropping deep so much.
One other thought...THANK YOU GOD that Joe Hart was not taken on board again!