manufanatic
"crazy"
Why does it have to be Hazard or Kagawa? Can it not be both?![]()
Sure
Why does it have to be Hazard or Kagawa? Can it not be both?![]()
“@LaurensJulien: To sum up Hazard atm:#mcfc leading, #mufc just behind, #thfc (only with CL), not keen on #cfc,too expensive for #afc, not interested in #lfc”
And Yes it's twitter, but you'll be reading the same stuff in his columns in the next 24hrs
Baring in mind I know next to nothing about either player if we did just so happen sign both Hazard and Kagawa how would we most likely line up next season?
Valencia--Carrick--Kagawa--Hazard
---------------Rooney
-----------------Welbeck
or
Valencia--Carrick--Scholes--Hazard
---------------Kagawa
-----------------Rooney
or
Valencia--Carrick--Scholes--Kagawa
---------------Hazard
-----------------Rooney
I've genuinly got no clue where either of these players play so some help would be appreciated![]()
Reckon he'll go City tbh because they need width desperately in their side, it's pretty much non existent without the fullbacks bombing forward. Hazard would fit in with their style of play as well because he'd be comfortable rotating positions and cutting inside.
If we get Kagawa I wouldn't be bothered if they got Hazard. We'll develop Kagawa into an amazing player.
What a fecking gimp, as if he'd know that shit.
Close this thread and save us the disappointment. He's going to City. Hopefully they don't get Kagawa too.
He only wOrks for Le Parisien, info sport+ part of Canal+ rebranding and RTL.
3 of the biggest media outlets in France. In continental Europe clubs work with the media in a big way when it comes to transfers.
You have PSG and Real submitting transfer wishlists etc. his contacts list would be second to none in comparison to most journos.
We aren't famous for bidding wars either.
I'd rather be pessimistic and it happen than optimistic and it not
Or we could alternatively just make the transfer forum invisible to you![]()
'To sum up Hazard atm:#mcfc leading, #mufc just behind, #thfc (only with CL), not keen on #cfc,too expensive for #afc, not interested in #lfc”
You think he knows that City are so far leading the race, whatever that means, have they submitted an offer or what? We are just behind (yippee!), how? What have we done to be just behind? The story has just broke. Spurs will only get him if they get Champions League football, so what is that saying? If Spurs come fourth will they be leading the race and jump ahead of us and City? Hazard isn't keen on Chelsea, presumably he told him that. Arsenal aren't interested because he's too expensive, despite having plenty of money to make the signing and being linked with Hazard in the past very heavily. Then Liverpool, Hazard isn't interested again. He text him to say so.
That's a feck of a lot of information that he wouldn't be privy to. He might know some things but there is no way he knows all that.
Baring in mind I know next to nothing about either player if we did just so happen sign both Hazard and Kagawa how would we most likely line up next season?
Valencia--Carrick--Kagawa--Hazard
---------------Rooney
-----------------Welbeck
or
Valencia--Carrick--Scholes--Hazard
---------------Kagawa
-----------------Rooney
or
Valencia--Carrick--Scholes--Kagawa
---------------Hazard
-----------------Rooney
I've genuinly got no clue where either of these players play so some help would be appreciated![]()
The middle one, although they could switch so suppose it could be the third as well.
Definitely not the first.
Then quite frankly neither are what we need then
Why is that?
We could do with another wide player, seeing as many people think Park will leave in the summer.
We could do with another wide player yes (regardless if Park stays) but we're crying out for at least 2 central midfielders
what exactly is Vieras role? Is he an embassador? A scout? A donkey looking for money?
Has Mourinho mentioned him? That seems the most likely result.
I've put 50 quids a couple of weeks ago on Hazard to Manchester City this summer.
Only fools believe that he'll be a Manchester United player in a few months.
Has Mourinho mentioned him? That seems the most likely result.
I prefer the money because i don't want him at Old TraffordMost likely. Although I'm sure you won't mind losing the 50 if we do end up signing him![]()
what exactly is Vieras role? Is he an embassador? A scout? A donkey looking for money?
Sorry for the derogatory remark about your post, but it grinds my gears when it's assumed that we can't compete with a shower like City for a top player. I don't understand how such a gross underestimation of our club's status in world football can be compatible with being a fan.
Because of money. That's why. Foreign players have no affiliation with Manchester United and City and Chelsea are competing for the same thing. Go there you've got a chance to win the same medals and earn more whilst doing it.
I have no inside info - he may sign for City, depends on his priorities - but there are good reasons why we might be preferred.
We're Manchester United, one of the great clubs in the game; we have the world's top manager, with a history of nurturing young talent second to none; a record of unbroken success over 20 years; a midfield which clearly needs strengthening; and we're not going to dump him for the next shiny toy if he isn't instantly successful.
I think we bring a lot to the table. If the size of his paycheck is his primary concern of course, he'll be a City player.
I prefer the money because i don't want him at Old Trafford![]()
Oh
I guess someone should inform Wayne Rooney.