Evra accuses Suarez of racist remarks | Suarez guilty of racial abuse

Suarez is gonna get fecked for this. Liverpool fans should be ashamed of themselves. I don't know a single one who didnt trot out the "Evra's done this twice before" bullshit. I understand defending your player, but they went beyond defending and focused on attacking Evra. Pathetic behaviour all round from them.

They're trying to smear the victim, plain and simple.

For a fanbase who themselves have been smeared as a collective you think they'd realise how repulsive it is.
 
Where did this 'he's done it twice before' thing come from anyway?

A "journalist" from the official Liverpool site failed to do any research, let the story get momentum, then claimed it was an experiment in misinformation.

I wish I was kidding.
 
A "journalist" from the official Liverpool site failed to do any research, let the story get momentum, then claimed it was an experiment in misinformation.

Well that's me convinced.
 
A "journalist" from the official Liverpool site failed to do any research, let the story get momentum, then claimed it was an experiment in misinformation.

I wish I was kidding.

live.jpg
 
I'm pretty sure our lads dont call him negrito. It doesn't make sense. There's absolutely no reason to do it. A lame excuse and the FA better not buy it

They probably don't, but even if they have it shouldn't matter. A friend can call a friend a 'n*gga' but that doesn't mean a stranger can use it, as everyone knows.
 
A "journalist" from the official Liverpool site failed to do any research, let the story get momentum, then claimed it was an experiment in misinformation.

I wish I was kidding.
what a clown

he should be done for slaunder if he is a journalist

isn't he some idiot blogger?
 
looking forward to this all ending. suarez referred to another mans skin colour during a heated exchange. hes been in europe several years. there really is no defence cultural or otherwise. he shouldve manned up and apologised before it all went so far
 
Kristian Walsh is his name, 'official' columnist for LFC.tv and it seems a contributor to the Telegraph as well.

Here is a full description of the Walsh comments:
Posted on Thursday, 20th October 2011 by TheBusbyWay

Surely Patrice Evra is Fighting a Losing Battle

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”

Joseph Gobbels, Adolf Hitler’s propaganda minister, was spot on when he said this as we found out with Patrice Evra this weekend.

On Saturday night Patrice Evra made claims that Liverpool’s Luis Suarez had racially abused him. Twitter was awash with people offering opinions on the matter then Liverpool Football Club employee Kristian Walsh tweeted:

Patrice Evra has accused racism of three players before today. All three have been cleared.

In a similar vein as Goebbel’s comment, all it takes is one crack in the veneer of truth for people to doubt. We as humans are not natural disposed to believe anyway, we require proof for EVERYTHING so if someone can sow a seed of doubt it is quite likely that this seed will grow to a mighty oak.

Kristian Walsh claimed he was trying to prove Goebbels’ theory, I don’t believe him, instead I think he genuinely thought that was the case and was attempting to discredit Patrice Evra so later when it became apparent that Evra had not made accusations of racism on 3 occasions he attempted to back track and eventually tweeted:

In conclusion: the Evra tweet was a fallacy. I’m an idiot.

Despite his admission, Walsh had done the damage he sought to do and people now had a reason to doubt Evra’s claims. Ask a person why they don’t believe Luis Suarez racially abused Evra and it is likely that they will make reference to Evra having ‘previous’ in regards to making allegations of racial abuse despite Walsh’s admission that he had made his statement up.

I don’t need to go into the history surrounding Patrice Evra and previous allegations of racism, Red Flag Flying High and Republik of Mancunia already did wonderful jobs debunking the lie that Walsh helped spread but what I can look at the present and the future.

People are calling Evra’s character into question and this has been made even worse by the fact that Sky claim that they cannot find footage verifying Evra’s claims (would it be a weak argument to claim that can’t find footage to disprove Evra’s claims? We all know something was definitely going on between the two players). In essence the Frenchman is being declared a liar but it’s not like Suarez is an angel.

We are all aware of his antics against Ghana in the World Cup, his biting of an opponent whilst playing for Ajax, his diving whilst in England. If people want to question Evra’s integrity, at least look at him in comparison to Suarez.

Evra has told Sir Alex Ferguson that he wants to pursue this and he clearly feels aggrieved but he faces a losing battle without actually footage to verify his claims. The incident that took place involving the Chelsea groundsman is a perfect example of this as two other people heard the abuse that was aimed at Evra yet Evra still received a four match ban and a hefty fine for his trouble.

In the film Training Day, Denzel Washington’s character states,

“It’s not what you know, it’s what you can prove.”

And Evra may struggle to prove Suarez did in fact racially abuse him. Despite being the victim in all of this, Evra appears to be coming off the worse from this and bizarrely Suarez is being painted as the victim with people already looking past the investigation and demanding that Evra be punished if Suarez is found innocent.

Upon investigation, we may never find out if Suarez did say the things that Evra has accused him of saying and that is as good as him being cleared. The burden of proof lies with Evra and whilst Suarez may have made the comments if Evra can’t prove it, it will be seen as a victory for Suarez.

Guilty people have got away with greater crimes (I’m sorry OJ did it!), so I hope that if Suarez did say the disgusting things he is accused of, not only as a United and Evra fan, but as a human being interested in what is just and fair that somehow it comes to light.

Written by Chudi for theBusbyWay
 
Its a shame that for some it's become a United v Liverpool. This is not what it's about. It's about the accusation of one player trying to wind an opposition player up by taunting him about his ethnic origin.
 
Its a shame that for some it's become a United v Liverpool. This is not what it's about. It's about the accusation of one player trying to wind an opposition player up by taunting him about his ethnic origin.

I don't read the Cafs reaction that way Rams. For the most part this thread has become a discussion on what others are saying around the issue and we are playing the waiting game to see what happens based on the evidence available.

Having said that, the FA must now put out its parameters on what is and what is not acceptable to say on the pitch. I know the Terry police investigation complicates the FA's reaction but hopefully they can act on Suarez (if found guilty). What would be unacceptable is a muddled response from the FA only to see them stick it to a United player over this issue at a later date.
 
Predictions?

I think it'll end up as a one-game ban, with perhaps two suspended, for abusive/inciting language, with the 'racial' element deemed unproven. Not the ideal outcome for anyone concerned but one that Liverpool would readily accept without appeal (as it's only a single game missed for Suarez). Depressing, but a face-saving outcome for LFC and the FA.

I still believe that the referee was told by Evra about the abuse during the match. In fact, recently, Chris Kamara supposedly showed Sky Sports footage featuring Evra complaining to the ref about said name-calling.
 
if he is found guilty could the police get involved in this?

I was wondering why they aren't already involved, as the Metropolitan police are involved in the Terry incident.

But then I thought, surely it would have to be Merseyside police who investigate it as that's where the incident took place.

Wouldn't there be a conflict there?

Firstly, half of them are probably Liverpool fans, and even if they could remain unbiased, there's no way they'd want to alienate the whole community if they had to charge Suarez with it.
 
I was wondering why they aren't already involved, as the Metropolitan police are involved in the Terry incident.

But then I thought, surely it would have to be Merseyside police who investigate it as that's where the incident took place.

Wouldn't there be a conflict there?

Firstly, half of them are probably Liverpool fans, and even if they could remain unbiased, there's no way they'd want to alienate the whole community if they had to charge Suarez with it.

sounds like a job for John Stalker.
 
Just been listening on the radio to gus poyet trying to defend suarez,he says in south america if you have a big nose they call you bignose,if you are fat they call you fatty,and if you are black they call you negro,I used to like gus poyet, he also said if evra don"t like it he should go home.He"s a racist twat just like his countryman..made himself look like a right cnut.
 
Predictions?

I think it'll end up as a one-game ban, with perhaps two suspended, for abusive/inciting language, with the 'racial' element deemed unproven. Not the ideal outcome for anyone concerned but one that Liverpool would readily accept without appeal (as it's only a single game missed for Suarez). Depressing, but a face-saving outcome for LFC and the FA.

I still believe that the referee was told by Evra about the abuse during the match. In fact, recently, Chris Kamara supposedly showed Sky Sports footage featuring Evra complaining to the ref about said name-calling.

Depends what evidence the FA has, if there is apparently no evidence of Suarez saying what he did then why has the FA charged him.
He's shot himself in the foot because he admitted in that interview about what he called him isn't racial in his country so perhaps he might have got away with it?

I don't understand why you would need to call someone black any way. It would be the same if you swore at someone and called em a white boy, is still wrong.

I can't see him getting away with this one and if he did I'd be surprised. They need to wrap this and the JT thing quick. I'm certain someone will get a heavy ban out of them 2 and perhaps Sepp might shut his fat gob for once in his life.
 
Depends what evidence the FA has, if there is apparently no evidence of Suarez saying what he did then why has the FA charged him.

Who knows. To say 'well, we tried, we took it as far as we could'? We'll see.

I mentioned earlier that Rooney-Ben Haim incident from a few years back. Rooney was banned for three matches for violent conduct, but the FA also charged Ben Haim for, basically, simulation, as he made a meal of it. But eventually he was cleared because it couldn't be proven.
 
I was wondering why they aren't already involved, as the Metropolitan police are involved in the Terry incident.

But then I thought, surely it would have to be Merseyside police who investigate it as that's where the incident took place.

Wouldn't there be a conflict there?

Firstly, half of them are probably Liverpool fans, and even if they could remain unbiased, there's no way they'd want to alienate the whole community if they had to charge Suarez with it.

Apparently a supporter, someone in the stands?, made a complaint to the police.
 
Just been listening on the radio to gus poyet trying to defend suarez,he says in south america if you have a big nose they call you bignose,if you are fat they call you fatty,and if you are black they call you negro,I used to like gus poyet, he also said if evra don"t like it he should go home.He"s a racist twat just like his countryman..made himself look like a right cnut.

I don't think this cnut realises there's a big difference between calling somebody big nose and calling them the N word.

What an absolute moron Poyet is.
 
There are two type of defense from the Suarez/Terry camp.

Why is a racial insult worse then a personal insult (fatty, red-head, idiot etc)?
You don't have to be a racist just because you in the heat of the moment call a black person words like black before the insult or "negrito".

And to add what Sepp Blatter initially said. Why just don't shake hands after the game and move on. All these three comments make sense. Except from a couple of reasons.

There is a historical background. Slaves from Africa. Discrimination and apartheid. Limited legal human rights. KKK. All this together is common knowledge if you are over 15 years old and have any sorts of historical education. So for all above reasons every person with an intelligence above an ape know that using a racial word, in any sort or shape, is insulting and ileagal.

John Terry and Luis Suarez know this. This isn't rocket science or any hidden agenda against Liverpool or the English captain. It's common sense. That make me come to only two solutions why they said what they said. Either they are retarded on a level that would qualify them to a institution with a legal guardian helping them, or they are first class racists.

To everybody who defend them I say guilty by association. And I'm sad to see that many respectable persons fits to that category.
 
Just been listening on the radio to gus poyet trying to defend suarez,he says in south america if you have a big nose they call you bignose,if you are fat they call you fatty,and if you are black they call you negro,I used to like gus poyet, he also said if evra don"t like it he should go home.He"s a racist twat just like his countryman..made himself look like a right cnut.

Right, Evra should leave England because a Uruguyan's culture is inherently racist.

Well done Gus, didn't think you could look any more fecking retarded.
 
Thankfully the days of Jimmy Hill and the like are pretty much extinct.

But he was on TV on a weekly basis about 6 or 7 years ago, so it goes to show how far in general things have come along.

Which is why it is so go damn annoying that Suarez, than Terry and now worse of all Blatter have all happened in recent weeks.

But in a strange way it may even help the racism campaign even further.
 
Hmm...I used to like Poyet. Comes across as a massive twat with those comments though.

In the Whelan, Blatter mold.
 
Not to take any players side, but its a really messy thing to argue. I'm sure most people who were born in a non-english speaking country or english isnt their primary language, would know that whats said in a different language isnt the same meaning as it is in english. The whole N taboo word is from America. The rest of the world have their own way of speaking. Negro and N word are two completely and totally different words. Negro in itself is not racist. Its a description of a race, like caucasian, asian, etc. The problem here is this happened in an english speaking league, where eerything said is looked at on an english speakers view.The english language is descriptive. Other languages are not.

What Suarez said, to me at least since I am from a different language barrier altogether, is not racist. To an english speaker it is. The worst thing about it a primary english speaker, who really doesnt understand the cultural differences, will look at what I said and want me burned at the stake, because thats how an english speaker will see it. Its black or white those individuals, pun not intended.

What I'd like to see is people using the N word or whatever associated to it in a friendly way STOPPED. If its a racist term, then people shouldnt be using it for whatever reason. The word stays in the cycle of communication and isnt forgotten like some really old terms used to decribe people that arent mentioned anymore. If its racist for someone else to say, it should be racist for a friend to say. Especially on the pitch where other people can hear it since thats a place of professional work for these people and anything said on the field, which is where Suarez would of heard the others saying it, should be considered as racist also. Thats my stance anyway. I hate hearing people using the N word as banter but then cry foul when someone who isnt their friend uses it. Its no different to all the gangster wannabe white trash who go around saying My nigga my nigga because they hear it so often it seems natural for them to use it as well to mimick the gangster way of life/speech. You dont like to hear the word, stop using it yourself. But thats not going to happen. So if nigga from friends is fine, then negrito, which means something COMPLETELY different, and used in a friendly way, should also be fine. If one isnt good, then remove both.