General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time

How do you intend to vote in the 2017 General Election if eligible?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 80 14.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 322 58.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 57 10.3%
  • Green

    Votes: 20 3.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 13 2.4%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 29 5.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 14 2.5%

  • Total voters
    551
  • Poll closed .
Suppose so, yeah. A shame Kennedy is no longer with us - very good politician who might have done a good job stepping back in, had he been able to win a seat.
Kennedy was fantastic I agree.
 
If Cable gets back in, could probably do worse than him. Surely one of the others would do an alright job, though? Baffles me that Farron won.
I think Cable has about as many of the negatives as Clegg without many of the positives. Lamb's sensible but always looks like he has a cold and might lose his seat anyway. Sarah Olney has been an MP for less than a year. That's already 4 of their 9 MPs including Clegg and Farron! Says a lot that the favourite to be the next leader isn't an incumbent MP or even standing in a Lib Dem held seat (Jo Swinson).
 
Boris may be the undoing of the Tories trying to attack Corbyn on this. Despite him coming out and saying a link is nonsense, he's written previous articles at length saying the opposite.
 
I'm all for someone going Lib Dem in the wider context if it's the party they genuinely support, or if they're in a marginal constituency where they prefer the Lib Dems to the alternative choice and they have a reasonable chance of getting in, but it's going to be a wasted vote in most places. They had a strong chance to rebuild during this election but Farron's being a bit shite as leader and thus they're not looking all too much stronger than 2015 even though they had the perfect breeding ground to show improvement.

He's been pretty awful, but you know. Democracy is basically a mirage, there is no point voting for anyone other than who you actually want.
 
Telegraph says.

'War on terror' is not working, says Jeremy Corbyn – as Labour leader accused of 'twisted reasoning' over terrorism

Not a fair reflection of what Corbyn said, but there is also the ethical question of watching a genocide happen if there is a strict non-intervention policy. I believe Liberal leaders who get elected on campaign promises of non-intervention find it difficult to adhere to their ideology once they are in the hot seat and have to make tough decisions. Would be interesting to see what Corbyn will do once he becomes PM (here's to hoping)
 
The full YouGov poll is out

Even Conservative voters agree with Corbyn

As07aae.png
 
I think Cable has about as many of the negatives as Clegg without many of the positives. Lamb's sensible but always looks like he has a cold and might lose his seat anyway. Sarah Olney has been an MP for less than a year. That's already 4 of their 9 MPs including Clegg and Farron! Says a lot that the favourite to be the next leader isn't an incumbent MP or even standing in a Lib Dem held seat (Jo Swinson).

Even if she did get in Swinson would be a risk - always a chance of an SNP upswing taking the seat right back off her at a following election.
 
May saying that Corbyn stated terrorist attacks "are our own fault". Absolute nonsense.
 
Every tragedy is an opportunity to these creatures.
 
Time for the United Kingdom and other European nations to be hard on Saudi Arabia and Qatar. No more nice relations and selling them arms and stuff. Saudi funds some very dodgy organisations and is responsible for spreading their Wahhabi ideology around the world.
 
Time for the United Kingdom and other European nations to be hard on Saudi Arabia and Qatar. No more nice relations and selling them arms and stuff. Saudi funds some very dodgy organisations and is responsible for spreading their Wahhabi ideology around the world.
Selling the Saudi's weapons is a necessary evil at this point.
 
Selling the Saudi's weapons is a necessary evil at this point.

I'm sorry?

What good have they done with the weapons besides killing scores of Yemeni children and having them find their way in the possession of jihadists? How has that benefited Britain in any way?
 
Neil going in heavy on Corbyn's IRA connections. Not sure he's handling it too well.
 
He's not giving any straight answers, doesn't look good to me.
 
He's really not doing well on NATO, kind of dodging the question a little bit.
 
Neil going in heavy on Corbyn's IRA connections. Not sure he's handling it too well.

Why would people support a leader who supported the IRA?

Kinda fecking question is that. Ridoculous2
 
Corbyn is trying to maintain dignity but his calls for restrain and to finish his lines won't sit well sadly. Need a stronger second half.
 
Why would people support a leader who supported the IRA?

Kinda fecking question is that. Ridoculous2

I don't think it's ridiculous for Neil to call up Corbyn's past connections and in particular McDonnell and Abbott's comments, which are worse.
 
I don't think it's ridiculous for Neil to call up Corbyn's past connections and in particular McDonnell and Abbott's comments, which are worse.

Connections. Not flat out saying he supported the IRA. McDonnel is the one who has the issues not Corbyn
 
He's doing ok.Don't think the average person cares to much about his past. They've read it all before
 
Connections. Not flat out saying he supported the IRA. McDonnel is the one who has the issues not Corbyn

And Neil rightfully called that up as well. Under Corbyn, McDonnell would be the second most powerful man in any Labour government.

The question itself might have been a bit hysterical though, and Neil did seem to be misconstruing Corbyn's point on the initial question on terrorism.
 
Don't think he's doing that well to be honest. This format does not suit him in the slightest.
 
He's doing ok.Don't think the average person cares to much about his past. They've read it all before

Considering he's got the momentum right now, the Tories run the risk of looking like they're just trying to deflect away from their own problems and that they're going with a negative approach, especially when Corbyn's positive ideas seem to be resonating with a lot of people.
 
Don't think he's doing that well to be honest. This format does not suit him in the slightest.

He's more of a soft-spoken, discussion type of person, while Neil likes to constantly grill his interviewees and will often interrupt/talk over them. I don't mind Neil sometimes because he can be very good at giving a grilling and putting politicians on the spot, but sometimes it can feel like he's trying to be too Paxman-esque.
 
BBC are the puppets of the Tories now

Presumably you didn't see their criticism of the Tories throughout...well, most of the past couple of weeks? Or May getting grilled by Neil as well?