Harry Kane | "I will be staying at Tottenham this summer and will be 100% focused on helping the team achieve success."

Can we not go for Cristiano? Wouldn't he give us a couple of years maybe even better than Kane?
 
This will be done by next week. And when I mean done, I mean Kane signing for City.
 
Why would we need Martial when we are stacked in those wide attacking areas? He isn't a centre forward or at least, he isn't a very good one. Lingard :lol: just no.
So are you expecting Levy to bring it much better players with the money I take it? Careful what you wish for
 
He isn't a quality striker in my eyes. He is ok with the odd moment where he looks good but over the last few years what has he actually delivered? Not very much really. I would be extremely disappointed if we were interested in him. We already have a player who looks top class one day and pretty shite for the next 5 games and that's Son, we don't need another one. Son is also twice the player Martial is. I'd rather have Danny Ings to be brutally honest.
Martial has obviously been shit this season, but last season he was our best player over the course of the season and rightfully won our Players' Player of the Year. That was him playing as a striker. The only other time he played as a striker (his first season) he was also one of our best players.

There is obviously a risk as you don't know whether you'll get last seasons Martial or this seasons (or maybe a bit of both), but if you take that risk and win out you'd have a better striker than anyone else I think you can realistically get. With you guys interested in signing him at least twice before in the past, it isn't that far-fetched.
 
Even if we don't get Kane, I'd try to offload Martial on Spurs. Fits that club perfectly. Flatters to deceive and downs his tools at the first sign of a challenge.
:lol:
I don't think we'll ever sell him under the current ownership. I mean, who would sell Pele in his prime?
 
Martial has obviously been shit this season, but last season he was our best player over the course of the season and rightfully won our Players' Player of the Year. That was him playing as a striker. The only other time he played as a striker (his first season) he was also one of our best players.

There is obviously a risk as you don't know whether you'll get last seasons Martial or this seasons (or maybe a bit of both), but if you take that risk and win out you'd have a better striker than anyone else I think you can realistically get. With you guys interested in signing him at least twice before in the past, it isn't that far-fetched.

We were interested in him when he went to Utd but I don't think there has been any serious interest since then. He hasn't exactly lived up to the hype. Our new manager will likely have their own targets anyway. Also, we wouldnt pay him anywhere near what he earns at Utd so no way would he even agree to come if we did want him.
 
We were interested in him when he went to Utd but I don't think there has been any serious interest since then. He hasn't exactly lived up to the hype. Our new manager will likely have their own targets anyway. Also, we wouldnt pay him anywhere near what he earns at Utd so no way would he even agree to come if we did want him.

Is there any news or rumours of who this might be yet?
 
Why would we need Martial when we are stacked in those wide attacking areas? He isn't a centre forward or at least, he isn't a very good one. Lingard :lol: just no.
Well I can get you'd be underwhelmed if Kane was replaced by these 2 but I still think Martial would be good for 15-20 goals a season. Along with someone like Ings and Son, I think he could do decent over the course of a season for you guys. Anyway it's all hypothetical talk, not much chance of Kane actually coming to Utd, so all the swap talk is quite moot.
 
Well I can get you'd be underwhelmed if Kane was replaced by these 2 but I still think Martial would be good for 15-20 goals a season. Along with someone like Ings and Son, I think he could do decent over the course of a season for you guys. Anyway it's all hypothetical talk, not much chance of Kane actually coming to Utd, so all the swap talk is quite moot.
Is this the same Martial that has only ever scored more than 15 goals in a season twice in his entire career?
 
He's basically saying he wants to go to City in that interview :lol: think he'd be happy to go to United or Chelsea as well but City being his preferred destination. They could be unstoppable with Kane upfront unfortunately.
 
Said it many times. Signing that deal with a guy like Levy is potentially career suicide. Grealish is making the same mistake.
And Zaha before him. The money these clubs can offer at the time is very tempting though.
 
And Zaha before him. The money these clubs can offer at the time is very tempting though.
Kane is reportedly on 130k a week. I'm sure a number of clubs would have easily been willing to pay him more.
 
If you're a player like Kane and you want to lea

Roberto Martinez is a shout, too. They wont get an "elite" manager. Reason being the squad is decent, but you're not going to get backed as much as you want by Levy, and you'll end up hamstrung and fecked off
I think they’ll go for Scott Parker, former player, london boy
 
Said it many times. Signing that deal with a guy like Levy is potentially career suicide. Grealish is making the same mistake.
Or was Grealish just safeguarding Villa’s financial security knowing that they’d get a big bid of 60m plus?
He’s such a Villa lad that he doesn’t want to leave yet but knows a bid will come
 
Just reading he was bigging up De Bruyne and saying he wants to stay in England in a recent interview. Very obvious the direction this is going.
 
IF Kane can extricate himself from Spurs and get to City, it's an amazing move for him. They're really well placed to win plenty of trophies over the next 3-4 years and he'll score bundles of goals in that side.
 
Or was Grealish just safeguarding Villa’s financial security knowing that they’d get a big bid of 60m plus?
He’s such a Villa lad that he doesn’t want to leave yet but knows a bid will come
Villas owners are loaded
 
Said it many times. Signing that deal with a guy like Levy is potentially career suicide. Grealish is making the same mistake.

Think the thing that's saving Grealish is his age. At 25, even with four years left on the new deal, by time he gets to two years left on his contract he'll only be 27. Villa may even be persuaded to get rid of Grealish at 26, knowing that his value will fall a lot in the last two years of his deal.

Completely agree with you on Kane though. His PR campaign is unlikely to move Daniel Levy. If City don't cough up the cash it doesn't matter how bad Kane wants to play with De Bruyne.
 
Or was Grealish just safeguarding Villa’s financial security knowing that they’d get a big bid of 60m plus?
He’s such a Villa lad that he doesn’t want to leave yet but knows a bid will come
He can't be sure a bid of that amount will come. The word is Villa want 80m. That's where players get themselves trapped. Imo, these players should not be signing these long-term deals without clauses. Kane is totally at the mercy of Levy and has little control over his future. Safeguarding Villa's financial security is just bad advice. His career should be his priority.
 
Villas owners are loaded
I don’t think that’s the point. Not wanting to leave cheap or free shows respect and loyalty to your boyhood club,
We’d be up in arms if Greenwood ran his contract down to get a move
 
He can't be sure a bid of that amount will come. The word is Villa want 80m. That's where players get themselves trapped. Imo, these players should not be signing these long-term deals without clauses. Kane is totally at the mercy of Levy and has little control over his future. Safeguarding Villa's financial security is just bad advice. His career should be his priority.
Aah but do we have privy to what’s in his contract? :smirk:
 
Kane is reportedly on 130k a week. I'm sure a number of clubs would have easily been willing to pay him more.
With very achievable clauses, I have zero doubts. A player of his quality doesn’t just sign a base 130k for 6 years.
 
No
I don’t think that’s the point. Not wanting to leave cheap or free shows respect and loyalty to your boyhood club,
We’d be up in arms if Greenwood ran his contract down to get a move
Who said he was leaving cheap? There was talk of 100m odd bids for him!
 
No
Who said he was leaving cheap? There was talk of 100m odd bids for him!
Not before he signed the extension there wasn’t. That was pure bs from the media.

Anyway this is getting away from the point. Kane was the player who shouldn’t have signed the extension