There are some rumours that Levy and City have almost agreed a Fee. They are only 5 Million £ apart. ( Rumoured Fee is 115£ Million )
City are taking no prisoners
There are some rumours that Levy and City have almost agreed a Fee. They are only 5 Million £ apart. ( Rumoured Fee is 115£ Million )
Otamendi
So are you expecting Levy to bring it much better players with the money I take it? Careful what you wish forWhy would we need Martial when we are stacked in those wide attacking areas? He isn't a centre forward or at least, he isn't a very good one. Lingardjust no.
Martial has obviously been shit this season, but last season he was our best player over the course of the season and rightfully won our Players' Player of the Year. That was him playing as a striker. The only other time he played as a striker (his first season) he was also one of our best players.He isn't a quality striker in my eyes. He is ok with the odd moment where he looks good but over the last few years what has he actually delivered? Not very much really. I would be extremely disappointed if we were interested in him. We already have a player who looks top class one day and pretty shite for the next 5 games and that's Son, we don't need another one. Son is also twice the player Martial is. I'd rather have Danny Ings to be brutally honest.
There are some rumours that Levy and City have almost agreed a Fee. They are only 5 Million £ apart. ( Rumoured Fee is 115£ Million )
Even if we don't get Kane, I'd try to offload Martial on Spurs. Fits that club perfectly. Flatters to deceive and downs his tools at the first sign of a challenge.
Martial has obviously been shit this season, but last season he was our best player over the course of the season and rightfully won our Players' Player of the Year. That was him playing as a striker. The only other time he played as a striker (his first season) he was also one of our best players.
There is obviously a risk as you don't know whether you'll get last seasons Martial or this seasons (or maybe a bit of both), but if you take that risk and win out you'd have a better striker than anyone else I think you can realistically get. With you guys interested in signing him at least twice before in the past, it isn't that far-fetched.
We were interested in him when he went to Utd but I don't think there has been any serious interest since then. He hasn't exactly lived up to the hype. Our new manager will likely have their own targets anyway. Also, we wouldnt pay him anywhere near what he earns at Utd so no way would he even agree to come if we did want him.
Well I can get you'd be underwhelmed if Kane was replaced by these 2 but I still think Martial would be good for 15-20 goals a season. Along with someone like Ings and Son, I think he could do decent over the course of a season for you guys. Anyway it's all hypothetical talk, not much chance of Kane actually coming to Utd, so all the swap talk is quite moot.Why would we need Martial when we are stacked in those wide attacking areas? He isn't a centre forward or at least, he isn't a very good one. Lingardjust no.
Is there any news or rumours of who this might be yet?
Lots of rumours but nothing concrete. I honestly have no clue.
Is this the same Martial that has only ever scored more than 15 goals in a season twice in his entire career?Well I can get you'd be underwhelmed if Kane was replaced by these 2 but I still think Martial would be good for 15-20 goals a season. Along with someone like Ings and Son, I think he could do decent over the course of a season for you guys. Anyway it's all hypothetical talk, not much chance of Kane actually coming to Utd, so all the swap talk is quite moot.
This will be done by next week. And when I mean done, I mean Kane signing for City.
I hardly care at this stage to be brutally honest.Who would be your 1st choice out of the remaining options?
I'm thinking they are going to get Sarri.Who would be your 1st choice out of the remaining options?
worth a punt if you think it... 25/1 available on himI'm thinking they are going to get Sarri.
Roberto Martinez is a shout, too. They wont get an "elite" manager. Reason being the squad is decent, but you're not going to get backed as much as you want by Levy, and you'll end up hamstrung and fecked offworth a punt if you think it... 25/1 available on him
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/tottenham/next-permanent-manager
And Zaha before him. The money these clubs can offer at the time is very tempting though.Said it many times. Signing that deal with a guy like Levy is potentially career suicide. Grealish is making the same mistake.
Kane is reportedly on 130k a week. I'm sure a number of clubs would have easily been willing to pay him more.And Zaha before him. The money these clubs can offer at the time is very tempting though.
I think they’ll go for Scott Parker, former player, london boyIf you're a player like Kane and you want to lea
Roberto Martinez is a shout, too. They wont get an "elite" manager. Reason being the squad is decent, but you're not going to get backed as much as you want by Levy, and you'll end up hamstrung and fecked off
Or was Grealish just safeguarding Villa’s financial security knowing that they’d get a big bid of 60m plus?Said it many times. Signing that deal with a guy like Levy is potentially career suicide. Grealish is making the same mistake.
Villas owners are loadedOr was Grealish just safeguarding Villa’s financial security knowing that they’d get a big bid of 60m plus?
He’s such a Villa lad that he doesn’t want to leave yet but knows a bid will come
Outside chance of Conte? Rumoured to be leaving Inter in the summer.I'm thinking they are going to get Sarri.
Said it many times. Signing that deal with a guy like Levy is potentially career suicide. Grealish is making the same mistake.
He can't be sure a bid of that amount will come. The word is Villa want 80m. That's where players get themselves trapped. Imo, these players should not be signing these long-term deals without clauses. Kane is totally at the mercy of Levy and has little control over his future. Safeguarding Villa's financial security is just bad advice. His career should be his priority.Or was Grealish just safeguarding Villa’s financial security knowing that they’d get a big bid of 60m plus?
He’s such a Villa lad that he doesn’t want to leave yet but knows a bid will come
I don’t think that’s the point. Not wanting to leave cheap or free shows respect and loyalty to your boyhood club,Villas owners are loaded
Aah but do we have privy to what’s in his contract?He can't be sure a bid of that amount will come. The word is Villa want 80m. That's where players get themselves trapped. Imo, these players should not be signing these long-term deals without clauses. Kane is totally at the mercy of Levy and has little control over his future. Safeguarding Villa's financial security is just bad advice. His career should be his priority.
With very achievable clauses, I have zero doubts. A player of his quality doesn’t just sign a base 130k for 6 years.Kane is reportedly on 130k a week. I'm sure a number of clubs would have easily been willing to pay him more.
Who said he was leaving cheap? There was talk of 100m odd bids for him!I don’t think that’s the point. Not wanting to leave cheap or free shows respect and loyalty to your boyhood club,
We’d be up in arms if Greenwood ran his contract down to get a move
Not before he signed the extension there wasn’t. That was pure bs from the media.No
Who said he was leaving cheap? There was talk of 100m odd bids for him!