Exactamundo. Great post.
Healthcare is a basic human right, money should have no say in it. If a country has the possibility to offer it to all it's citizens equally then it should, otherwise it's a huge failure.
That's a bingo.
However, you/we are preaching to the converted. I don't think anyone here feels differently. If they do they have kept it short to avoid the certain mass assault they would be subjected to.
That's a bingo.
However, you/we are preaching to the converted. I don't think anyone here feels differently. If they do they have kept it short to avoid the certain mass assault they would be subjected to.
But, people will still go bankrupt according to this statement. Why should anyone go bankrupt for getting healthcare? Why is this a standard practice in the US?
I don't mind paying for insurance as long as it goes back into healthcare. No one should go bankrupt and no one should be denied the services they need to get they healthcare they want.
I am not sure how many of the bankruptcies attributed to medical debt are actually people without insurance, which is why I said significantly reduced. Its worth noting that to be considered a medical debt bankruptcy the filing just has to include some medical debt. In many cases the amount of medical debt was is under $1,000, and the filer had many other debts.
Of course any sort of healthcare debt is unacceptable because it should be basically free at POS for everyone. I am in favor or single payer UHC BTW
Medical debt is the No. 1 source of personal bankruptcy filings in the United States and people 65 and older now make up roughly 8% of bankruptcy filers, up from 7% in 2008.
The Reasons More Older Americans Are Filing For Bankruptcy
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nextav...icans-are-filing-for-bankruptcy/#1d4cd55a5fad
The article was good for highlighting people get medical debt in the US but lack any substance. Its main point is the number of over 65s filing bankruptcy with some medical debt rose last year. A shift from 7% to 8% of the total bankruptcies is very misleading. Firstly the percentage of the population over 65 rises every year so you would expect that number to rise over time. The number of total bankruptcies has been trending down. People over 65 have fixed incomes so bankruptcies in that age group will not fall as fast as the rest of the population. That could mean the overall share of bankruptcies for the over 65s shifted up.
Elephant in the room -- raising costs.
Definitely a major problem. Not just in the US but pretty much everywhere.
There was a notable study done in the 70s that predicted that if healthcare costs/employment continued to rise at the rates in the 70s something like 30% of people would work in the NHS within 50 years. Thankfully the predictions were out but healthcare costs have risen conssitanetly and will continue to do so.
The US is somewhat lucky if they can move to a single payer UCH system because costs could potentially be reduced by 20-30%.
Agree -- the cost increase of healthcare across the world is due primarily to chronic diseases especially diabetes, hypertension and obesity and the complexity of management of folks who have a more complex scenario of more than one chronic disease.
The cause of chronic disease is due to ageing population and urbanisation (or both) which has led to a shitty lifestyle. What is at the core of that shitty lifestyle especially the baby boomers tends to be of a psychological in nature ie depression, isolation/loneliness etc.
Why the system is failing is the lack of accountability of everyone up & down the ecosystem and the lack of patient-outcomes approach.
You can had rising population and increasing number of procedures to the list above. When I was s a kid the number of common operations performed by teh NHS was relatively small. A knee or hip replacement was unheard of and now they are common everyday operation. Advancements in medicine and healthcare are awesome but they can also had a burden to budgets.
Definitely a major problem. Not just in the US but pretty much everywhere.
There was a notable study done in the 70s that predicted that if healthcare costs/employment continued to rise at the rates in the 70s something like 30% of people would work in the NHS within 50 years. Thankfully the predictions were out but healthcare costs have risen conssitanetly and will continue to do so.
The US is somewhat lucky if they can move to a single payer UCH system because costs could potentially be reduced by 20-30%.
Yes I know it is unlikely to happen BUT if it ever does it's an opportunity to reduce healthcare spending. Got to try and be glass half full![]()
I think there is a misconception about the quality of US healthcare.
For the average US citizen with an average health insurance plan, it's absolutely average. It's actually probably below average. I don't know the exact numbers, so I will make an educated number from ass guess, that 95% of people in the USA have inferior general health care than all of Western Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and and other western democracy. However, if you're a millionaire, or you're willing to bankrupt yourself, you can have the best doctors in the world and the best healthcare in most fields, not all fields, but most.
Healthcare in the US is like everything in the US. If you're average, you're getting rubbish. If you're rich, you get the best of everything.
don't employers have a legal obligation to give you the time off to go to court?... pretty sure they do in the ukim sure it hasnt occured to you in your comfortable middle class existence but appearing in court to discuss paying money you dont have is not just as simple as telling your boss you have a dentist appointment and driving your camry to court
im sure it hasnt occured to you in your comfortable middle class existence but appearing in court to discuss paying money you dont have is not just as simple as telling your boss you have a dentist appointment and driving your camry to court
One thing you have to adapt to in the US is the drug system. It can be dramatically different depending on the doctor you visit. My GP nearly always knows which pharmacies have special offers or where the drug is cheapest. I have had basic meds countless times where he has told me to go to a par.
I have also been to a specialist that wrote me up for a new drug that was $600. Turns out it was a combination of two common OTC drugs which would cost about $15 a month. Why did she write that prescription? Because she was getting kick backs from the drug rep is my guess.
Even when you do have a prescription check on an RX site where it is cheapest. The drug above is $51 in Walmart and a couple of other major chains.
Yeah great system when you can't even trust your doctor.
I was highlighting what you said to make the greater point that it is a shocking system. No different to the corruption you read about in third-world countries.
The marketing of prescription drugs to the public as products is astounding to me.
Just because you do more of something doesn't mean you are better. The reason many procedures and treatments occur is because they are lucrative.
Agreed.. but Mike said back on page one when I mentioned people going bankrupt because of high prescription charges.....The marketing of prescription drugs to the public as products is astounding to me.
It really doesn't work like that. Health insurance covers prescriptions. It also covers all costs when you have surgery. .
Agreed.. but Mike said back on page one when I mentioned people going bankrupt because of high prescription charges.....
So which is it?