Stacks
Full Member
Modric? I don't think you can compare Scholes and Xavi because whoever has Xavi on their team, WILL dominate the midfield and the opposition has to simply surrender possession and even go 2 banks of 4 behind the ball.The defintion of a good player: someone who has a positive influence on the pitch for his team. The more positive the influence, the better the player.
Generally speaking, goals are the biggest influence. But there is occasionally that rare kind of player who can run a game on his own. Somebody who it's impossible to stand-off, but also impossible to close-down. Somebody who can set the tempo of his own team and force the opposition to play at the tempo of his choosing Scholes was the best at that.
Alongisde Xavi and Pirlo, he was the biggest influencer I've ever seen in midfield.
But the thing that elevates Scholes above Xavi and Pirlo is the fact that he was equally world class as a goal-scoring #10 and as a box-to-box midfielder. He's the only man I've seen capable of being the most important influence on the pitch in 3 totally different roles.
After Messi and Ronaldo, he's as good as any player in the last 25 years. If you were building a title winning team, you'd pick him before someone like Zidane (who would blow hot and cold during a season).
Scholes was not world class as a 10 as he did little on the world stage in that role. A very good EPL season isn't enough. Gotta do at on the greater stage. As a B2B he was regularly outshined by Vieira and Keane in England