AttackingFlair
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,654
Well it doesn't solve our midfield problem and it also weakens our attack.
Rooney would be great in midfield in the near future. It's not his best position as of today, but if that solves our current midfield problems, who cares about what his best position actually is.
We've got plenty of options up front. Someone had to play "out" of position. He's not the first one and won't be the last. It might actually prove to be a genius move by the gaffer
Agreed. I could see him becoming one of the best in the world in that position.
Chicharito, Berbatov, Welbeck, Owen and Macheda is hardly scraping the barrel is it?
Chicharito, Berbatov, Welbeck, Owen and Macheda is hardly scraping the barrel is it?
Or break the bank for a talent like Gotze to play in front of him, just behind Chicharito.Without Rooney it's certainly missing a World Class centre forward, yes.
We have great options in attack, but make no mistake, were Rooney to switch to CM full time, we would need to go and break the bank for a forward to replace him.
Or break the bank for a talent like Gotze to play in front of him, just behind Chicharito.
are you actually suggesting we move rooney to midfield, a position he has a whole two games experience in, and replace him with an attacking midfielder?!Or break the bank for a talent like Gotze to play in front of him, just behind Chicharito.
Exactly, this is it in a nutshell.
We can go out and buy MANY better CM than Rooney.
We can't buy any better forward.
Simples really.
CorrectWell yeah, that's basically what I was saying. We'd have to break the bank to buy a replacement for Rooney's position, someone like Götze to play in the hole.
Only problem we then have is:
a) Will Götze be as good as Rooney in that role?
b) Will Rooney be as good in CM as a specialist midfielder that we could have used the Götze money on.
Personally I think none of it makes any sense, it's not like we played great football with Rooney in there is it? despite some lovely hollywood balls we've been pretty shit with him in there. Give me a mix of Cleverley, together with either Anderson or Carrick with Rooney AHEAD of them please, that's where the great football and all of Rooney's goals at the start of the season came from.
No, I'm simply adding to what Sharky said, showing what great lengths United would be going to for a needless and pointless exercise. The idea is beyond silly in the extreme really Rooney will only play as an emergency midfielder under SAF, not as a permanent one.are you actually suggesting we move rooney to midfield, a position he has a whole two games experience in, and replace him with an attacking midfielder?!
Because that idea is even worse than the Rooney in midfield one. United would have to be set up ala Villareal during the reign of Riquelme to ever do that.Why isn't Berbatov moving further down the pitch being discussed here?
Why isn't Berbatov moving further down the pitch being discussed here?
Because my nan could muscle him off the ball (not a euphemism)
It's just a reflection of how poor our CM is.
Rooney is our best CM by a mile and he's not even supposed to be one
wtf?
Absolutely totally fecking ridiculous comment.
Carrick has been integral to 3 CL finals and plenty of PL wins, Rooney has played a couple of times in CM in games where we as a team have actually played pretty fecking shite. Had Rooney not been in midfield spraying way too many Hollywood balls then these were exactly the type of games that would've left the caf saying, "it's our SHITE midfield's fault".
Totally disagree. Carsick was very good but has lost something in the last two seasons. He hasn't scored in 61 games ffs
Totally disagree. Carsick was very good but has lost something in the last two seasons. He hasn't scored in 61 games ffs
I don't know how people on the basis of two matches(both against average opposition) can decide that Rooney is a better midfielder than Carrick.