Its as much their genocide as it is Israel's.
They don't call him Genocide Joe for nothing.
Its as much their genocide as it is Israel's.
I saw it on YouTube weeks ago.Yeah, because Germany in particular are terrified of any criticism of Israel being heard. Did you read the speech he wasn’t allowed to give?
That was the conclusion from many organizations, though the conclusion was not unanimous.I think its worth revisiting that missile strike on the hospital last year. After all that has happened since then, does anyone on here now actually believe that it was a misfired Hamas rocket?
I said this.
I stand by every word in that. People in here trusting literal monsters, Hamas, is beyond me. They didn't trust the numbers given by one Hamas branch based on lack of id, so they changed it to a different Hamas branch. Why? Because there are no other sources.
You are the only one confused… Israeli officials have told us countless times that their goal was and still is to starve and kill civilians and they’ve shown that as well.
This speech? https://diem25.org/yanis-varoufakis-palestine-congress-speech-that-was-banned-by-german-police/ What's wrong with it?I saw it on YouTube weeks ago.
A seditious and distinctively antisemitic apology of Hamas, worthy of a ban by German standards.
It's absolutely not surprising for anyone who followed the conflict prior to 10/7.Surprised there is barely any chat here about the Guardian article today. It is quite long but completely insane.
Did you miss the white text?This speech? https://diem25.org/yanis-varoufakis-palestine-congress-speech-that-was-banned-by-german-police/ What's wrong with it?
That one is genuinely contentious.I think its worth revisiting that missile strike on the hospital last year. After all that has happened since then, does anyone on here now actually believe that it was a misfired Hamas rocket?
Ah! You're on an irony rollDid you miss the white text?
Yeah, I'm dropping that.Ah! You're on an irony roll![]()
I think its worth revisiting that missile strike on the hospital last year. After all that has happened since then, does anyone on here now actually believe that it was a misfired Hamas rocket?
When the 1st hospital attack happened, it led to weeks of discourse: "Palestinians can't shoot straight", death toll is actually much lower, accidentally hit fuel storage, etc. When they first raided a hospital, there was a lot of discourse: MRI machine armoury, tunnels underneath, etc. When they first mowed down people surrounding an aid truck, there was tons of dicsourse: Hamas did it, these were terrorists, etc.
Since then they have attacked almost every hospital using both air and ground forces, have massacred people lining up for aid multiple times, and there has been no discourse and no need for a cover story since it becomes an accepted part of this war.
I mean...what else do you want to know about me? PM me, we'll have a lengthy conversation
I suspect you know literally feck all about much
Yeah, you assume too much, unfortunatelyThink this is probably the first time I've ever interacted with you in any way so no more than I already know is more than sufficient.
Just find it funny that someone who is pretending to engage in good faith, won't watch a 3 minute video about the topic they're discussing.
This of course assumes you're engaging in good faith yourself.....
Does the Biden Administration have any leg to stand on when it preaches to other countries about human rights in various avenues when it continues to support these unrelenting attacks by Israel on civilians?
How so many people can be confused on this is beyond me. Hamas targets civilians of Israel. They want to kill civilians. Woman and children. That is their goal. They use their own population, women and children, as human shields. They want their own population to get killed, so it reflects badly on Israel. This is their strategy. The numbers Hamas have provided may be correct or even too low, but UN recently revised it's estimate of women and children killed by about half, based on Hamas not being a reliable source. It is impossible to know what is the correct numbers. People taking Hamas' word regarding this as fact, is ludicrous. One shows oneself to be willing to belive just about anything, on very little evidence.
White House says Israel’s latest actions in Rafah do not cross US red line.
"Waiting for the Israeli military to conclude its investigation before commenting. Also expresses concern that the latest actions of Israel might not be in its best interest, because it might become increasingly isolated."
You just couldn't make it up. The US is lead by tragic clowns.
There's a reason why Israel never recognized the ICC and the ICJ.
That was the conclusion from many organizations, though the conclusion was not unanimous.
The US have chosen to die on this hill.
There are very serious, well-intentioned people in the Biden administration trying to improve the lives of Gazans. There are people that have lived in that part of the world since October 8th whose only role is to try and limit the suffering.
The US have chosen to die on this hill.
Ah, I stand corrected.Israel is by default of being member of the UN is signatory to the ICJ. So they recognise it.
Israel is not signatory to the ICC, but still the ICC warrants are binding to the countries signatory to it, meaning these countries are obliged to arrest Israelis if they land on their soil.
Yes, please quote what I saidYes, you said that. You also said a bunch of other things, which I addressed. Do you need me to quote the things you said, have you forgot? You did say things about the estimates, you did say things about what you think the reasons for them are. It makes no sense to put up a performance.
You are not beating the troll allegations when you act like this. I know you probably don't care, because this is how you always act, but sometimes you write things that makes it seem like you want to come across as someone who is not a joke. It's extremely weird behaviour, I don't get why you don't choose one or the other.
Well, I'm not gonna. For obvious reasons. Tell me what it's aboutThink this is probably the first time I've ever interacted with you in any way so no more than I already know is more than sufficient.
Just find it funny that someone who is pretending to engage in good faith, won't watch a 3 minute video about the topic they're discussing.
This of course assumes you're engaging in good faith yourself.....
ExplainThe irony would be hilarious if it weren't so utterly evil.
They never were and never had it. Anyone believing this fairy tale either drank too much kool-aid or is badly informed.This whole fiasco has just cemented that the West (with the US as the leader) aren't really the good guys of the world. A lot of people like to believe that we have some moral superiority over China and Russia, but when we actively support what's happening in Gaza, I don't really see how we can say that.
How so many people can be confused on this is beyond me. Hamas targets civilians of Israel. They want to kill civilians. Woman and children. That is their goal. They use their own population, women and children, as human shields. They want their own population to get killed, so it reflects badly on Israel. This is their strategy. The numbers Hamas have provided may be correct or even too low, but UN recently revised it's estimate of women and children killed by about half, based on Hamas not being a reliable source. It is impossible to know what is the correct numbers. People taking Hamas' word regarding this as fact, is ludicrous. One shows oneself to be willing to belive just about anything, on very little evidence.
It is a sign of how much influence they have lost. They know that even if they were to follow through, Israel would not listen to them now. They are finding excuses to change their definitions so that they can still appear to have some level of control and for there to be some doubts as to whether they are ignored by or are ignoring Israel.
The last thing they want is to say "stop" and for Israel to go "Nah, thanks - cut your funding, we don't care". The region would explode. Republicans would take advantage of it and block everything. The president would appear weak domestically and internationally. The big question would be what Iran, Russia and China would do about it. Israel is playing with fire, and the US is too weak and fractured to do anything about it.
Worst. Troll. Ever. In simpsons comic book guy voice.Yes, please quote what I said
Well, I'm not gonna. For obvious reasons. Tell me what it's about
Explain
They never were and never had it. Anyone believing this fairy tale either drank too much kool-aid or is badly informed.
The West, especially the US, has a long history of siding with the worst dictators, overthrowing democratically elected governments and invading countries, all of them being the ones that can't defend themselves. It still does it to this day. The international rules only apply when it suits them, and in many ways it as much as if not worse than China and Russia.
Gaza is just another example of its duplicity. It might've opened some eyes in the West, but the rest of the world has always seen the West essentially for what it is, a two-faced bully.
I think in europe most will rationalize it as "well, it's america, they're in charge. if we were in charge it would be different". Our migrant policy shows we probably would be no different.I honestly think the majority of people in Western countries believe it. Most people aren't engaged enough to debate a topic like this online - broadly they don't care. They've grown up on Western media diets and also simply want to believe we are better. I think this might be the first big "Are we the baddies?" moment for the West in a long time. Possibly since it became publicly accepted that the Iraq war a complete scam.
I think in europe most will rationalize it as "well, it's america, they're in charge. if we were in charge it would be different". Our migrant policy shows we probably would be no different.