Red Dreams
Full Member
what is wrong with seeking a coaltion government. It will be truly representative.
Party of government = able to win elections = able to attract people that have voted Tory. Which you forbade in your previous post.Yes indeed. A party of government who are also meant to be of the left.
Apparently it is ok to have right wing parties of govt, but not of the left?
indeed. what is the point of winning a GE and doing feck all for ordinary people?
I see Labour governing in a coalition which would be far better.
They are 'of the left' ffs...Yes indeed. A party of government who are also meant to be of the left.
Apparently it is ok to have right wing parties of govt, but not of the left?
They are 'of the left' ffs...
Do you think the last Labour government did nothing for ordinary people? Are you for or against the minimum wage, the living wage?
Do you think Corbyn's Labour Party can get elected?
Do you think it's worth the risk of putting a 'hard' left candidate forward (JC) and seeing if the public will take to that form of argument, or do you think that it's too big a risk to take, considering the likely loss of the North of England to UKIP?
What does core Labour mean to you?by going to the center we have lost core Labour. Labour can only govern now in a coalition. What is the point of appealing to Tory voters when we have to betray Labour values?
What does core Labour mean to you?
indeed. what is the point of winning a GE and doing feck all for ordinary people?
I see Labour governing in a coalition which would be far better.
Tax credit cuts were stopped mainly by the Labour lords team, who have basically declared independence from Corbyn. Ditto attempts by the Tories to weaken the unions.Same line of reasoning was used by the Lib Dems, where did it get them.. where did it get us? parties of protest can have just as much influence out of power than as a bit party in a coalition. I am sure some of Osbornes plans on tax credits were pulled back because there was public outrage led by the Labour Party under Corbyn.
Tax credit cuts were stopped mainly by the Labour lords team, who have basically declared independence from Corbyn. Ditto attempts by the Tories to weaken the unions.
Want to see who the Tory lite bunch here are going to blame if we do get a Blairite leader that ends up getting annihilated at a GE.
What happens then? Do we just keep shifting to the right until we trick Conservative voters into thinking we're the Tory party?
Not sure what you mean. Point is that they were able to stop it because they had the parliamentary numbers in the Lords chamber to do so - it wasn't a party of protest forcing the government to change, it was parliamentary democracy stopping them.Would you say that they would have diverged from Corbyn's views on that issue regardless?
Want to see who the Tory lite bunch here are going to blame if we do get a Blairite leader that ends up getting annihilated at a GE.
What happens then? Do we just keep shifting to the right until we trick Conservative voters into thinking we're the Tory party?
Not sure what you mean. Point is that they were able to stop it because they had the parliamentary numbers in the Lords chamber to do so - it wasn't a party of protest forcing the government to change, it was parliamentary democracy stopping them.
Angela Eagle seems to have taken the Liz Kendall mantle. Except Angela as no problems with policy but more with Jeremy. And she refused to say that Jeremy should automatically be on the ballot.Think some dirty tricks may be in play here.
(Obviously he means June 27th there)
Corbyn said he had no idea when Smith got that idea from. One is lying.
I knew it was them, even when it was the bears I knew it was them.Bloody Blairites.
So ironically then the centrists in the Labour party are going to be responsible for the split in the party as they seek to block Corbyn's name from the leadership ballot?
For a coup carried out in the name of unity and competence, Eagle has been awfully incompetent and divisive.
Angela Eagles voting recordI knew it was them, even when it was the bears I knew it was them.
Same here.If they block his name from the ballot I'm done and I know a good few members (who joined well before Corbyn) who are of the same opinion.
How anyone could be okay with it I beyond me. Pathetic behaviour
Angela Eagles voting record
The people who are backing her
Same here.
Sorry I meant to quote @Ubik post below.I don't want Angela Eagle to be leader of the Labour Party.
Angela Eagles voting record
The people who are backing her
Same here.
Indeed, she voted with the rest of the party on most issues.
Of course, if Corbyn resigned we could have a proper leadership contest with multiple candidates standing.
Indeed, she voted with the rest of the party on most issues.
Of course, if Corbyn resigned we could have a proper leadership contest with multiple candidates standing.
You get the feeling Eagles is being thrown under a bus by someone, or at best commuting a calculated professional foul - Taking out her man and bearing the public brunt, allowing someone else to step in when the dust has settled. The man after the man after Fergie, etc.
She can't possibly believe she'd win a GE. If she does, she's as simple as her haircut.
Because it's widely agreed that if Corbyn's on the ballot, there needs to be only a single challenger, otherwise the chances of beating him dwindle.Why aren't said candidates declaring their interest now?
Most unions recognise that the party has to be in power in order to help their members. If the hard left split away, hard to imagine the unions following. Not sure what would happen if Corbyn wins and a new SDP is formed.If Corbyn is ousted and the hard left split from a position of opposition do you think that the Unions will abandon ship as well, their standing must be at its lowest ebb in history anyway, would they risk complete insignificance or be more pragmatic?
Is it all the unions still backing Corbyn, or just McCluskey seemingly speaking on behalf of a huge number of different groups? It annoys me how he seems to be the sole union voice the news has been airing during this story.
The position they've seemingly agreed on is to say that if he's going to be challenged it has to be through a ballot, whether they'd put their backing behind him in said ballot (particularly Unison and GMB) remains to be seen. Have seen suggestions that Tim Roache (GMB) isn't quite as complimentary about Corbyn in private as he is in public.Is it all the unions still backing Corbyn, or just McCluskey seemingly speaking on behalf of a huge number of different groups? It annoys me how he seems to be the sole union voice the news has been airing during this story.