Jeremy Corbyn - Not Not Labour Party(?), not a Communist (BBC)

Such a negative force. Oooh Jeremy Corbyn.

Peterborough by-election: Labour beats Brexit Party to hold seat

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48532869

Farage once again fails to get a parliamentary seat , but still gets way to much airtime.

I hate to be thankful for a labour victory, but thank goodness they beat off the threat of the Brexit Party, for the time being.
 
He's a fool.
Labour lost 17% of the voters. Brexit will have a far bigger impact on people's lives than austerity. Maybe he thinks Brexit will be a mild inconvenience.

He may well be, but even fools can up with something that works now and again!
Jeremy's only main concern is obtaining power in Government, after a lifetime of radical thoughts and ambitions and getting nowhere he now realises that through the emergence of Brexit, he has vehicle to ride to power, but he has to be as merciless and ruthless in his pursuit of that power as the Tories always are, otherwise he won't win. Jeremy is a relatively old school politician who sees the holy grail almost within his grasp, he really doesn't care one way or another about Brexit, when he's in power he will do it his way, even fighting his own party in order to do so... or go down in flames trying. It is his one and only chance of being remembered in the pantheon of Socialist Hero's and Heroine's.

I accept that his policies sound marvellous, who could disagree with much of them, but even in power he cannot achieve their realisation, if he wins a GE the money will flow out of Britain like a dam bursting, it would make a no deal Brexit look positively mild by comparison? Jeremy will have to spend most of his post GE victory shoring up the pound, even if he gets elected in time to revoke A50!

He will now consider himself one step away from being able to deliver a heroic Socialist Government, if only he can continue to deny the realisation of Brexit, whilst not saying so out loud!
 
He may well be, but even fools can up with something that works now and again!
Jeremy's only main concern is obtaining power in Government, after a lifetime of radical thoughts and ambitions and getting nowhere he now realises that through the emergence of Brexit, he has vehicle to ride to power, but he has to be as merciless and ruthless in his pursuit of that power as the Tories always are, otherwise he won't win. Jeremy is a relatively old school politician who sees the holy grail almost within his grasp, he really doesn't care one way or another about Brexit, when he's in power he will do it his way, even fighting his own party in order to do so... or go down in flames trying. It is his one and only chance of being remembered in the pantheon of Socialist Hero's and Heroine's.

I accept that his policies sound marvellous, who could disagree with much of them, but even in power he cannot achieve their realisation, if he wins a GE the money will flow out of Britain like a dam bursting, it would make a no deal Brexit look positively mild by comparison? Jeremy will have to spend most of his post GE victory shoring up the pound, even if he gets elected in time to revoke A50!

He will now consider himself one step away from being able to deliver a heroic Socialist Government, if only he can continue to deny the realisation of Brexit, whilst not saying so out loud!

We'll become Venezuela II.
 
He may well be, but even fools can up with something that works now and again!
Jeremy's only main concern is obtaining power in Government, after a lifetime of radical thoughts and ambitions and getting nowhere he now realises that through the emergence of Brexit, he has vehicle to ride to power, but he has to be as merciless and ruthless in his pursuit of that power as the Tories always are, otherwise he won't win. Jeremy is a relatively old school politician who sees the holy grail almost within his grasp, he really doesn't care one way or another about Brexit, when he's in power he will do it his way, even fighting his own party in order to do so... or go down in flames trying. It is his one and only chance of being remembered in the pantheon of Socialist Hero's and Heroine's.

I accept that his policies sound marvellous, who could disagree with much of them, but even in power he cannot achieve their realisation, if he wins a GE the money will flow out of Britain like a dam bursting, it would make a no deal Brexit look positively mild by comparison? Jeremy will have to spend most of his post GE victory shoring up the pound, even if he gets elected in time to revoke A50!

He will now consider himself one step away from being able to deliver a heroic Socialist Government, if only he can continue to deny the realisation of Brexit, whilst not saying so out loud!

Winning a by election by a tiny margin is not much of a success. He has no hope of winning a GE by ignoring Brexit.
Yes Brexit + Corbyn - vultures will be picking over the bones of what's left of Britain. Donald+Vlad+Xi will love it.
 
I see he's come out to celebrate with his shin pads on.
 
Labour talk is a bit of a red herring. They returned pretty poorly here (they've only thrice returned lower in the history of the party) and won the by election as the result of the Brexit vote being split two ways.

That's good news for Labour which will probably replicate nationally (it would be a huge irony if Farage's Brexit party succeeded in getting Labour elected) but the real conversation should be bout the Conservatives. I can't really see how they will look at today's result and conclude anything other than they need to lurch further towards the right.

Oh and :lol: at the CHUK backed candidate finishing behind the Monster Raving Looney party.
 
The Brexit party won't have the same 'magnetic pull' effect in a GE as in the Euro's, but it will be enough to decimate the Tories.

I'm not sure the Brexit Party will a relevant concern at the next GE, because no Tory leader is calling a GE until Brexit is resolved.

The likeliest outcome now is crashing out without a deal on October 31st. When that happens, the Brexit Party's raison d'être immediately evaporates (see post- referendum UKIP, who were a complete non-entity in the 2017 election).

Even if we had a GE before Brexit was completed, it would also be a mistake to assume that the Brexit Party would only take votes off the Tories (as evidenced by the Euro election results).
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure the Brexit Party will a relevant concern at the next GE, because no Tory leader is calling a GE until Brexit is resolved.

The likeliest outcome now is crashing out without a deal on October 31st. When that happens, the Brexit Party's raison d'être immediately evaporates (see post- referendum UKIP, who were a complete non-entity in the 2017 election).

Even if we had a GE before Brexit was completed, it would also be a mistake to assume that the Brexit Party would only take votes off the Tories (as evidenced by the Euro election results).

No but the HoC in a no confidence vote and with the help of the Remain's secret weapon (John Bercow) could force one!

Don't forget the EU has all but turned its back on the UK now, for them its take it or leave it time UK, on 31st Oct. I can't see any prospect of the EU reconvening a negotiation team, can you?That's why Farage keeps up this bluff about 'let me at em'.. I want to join the negotiating team..."what negotiation and what team? The EU won't sanction further negotiations, and the Tories will never bring him on board even if there was one, so he can continue to say to the country "look see the Government is still against you, vote for me...er I mean the Brexit party!.

Whatever you may think of Nigel Farage and his politics you have to admit he is master at gaining the upper hand and he knocks all our current leading politicians into a cocked-hat. I suspect the whole front row of both the Tories and Labour will have to depart the stage and the new Brexit party and the Lib dems with a younger front bench will take things forward. Almost all of our leading politicians especially in the two main parties are already looking like yesterdays men (and women).

"Taxi to the back benches (or retirement homes) please".
 
No but the HoC in a no confidence vote and with the help of the Remain's secret weapon (John Bercow) could force one!

Don't forget the EU has all but turned its back on the UK now, for them its take it or leave it time UK, on 31st Oct. I can't see any prospect of the EU reconvening a negotiation team, can you?That's why Farage keeps up this bluff about 'let me at em'.. I want to join the negotiating team..."what negotiation and what team? The EU won't sanction further negotiations, and the Tories will never bring him on board even if there was one, so he can continue to say to the country "look see the Government is still against you, vote for me...er I mean the Brexit party!.

Whatever you may think of Nigel Farage and his politics you have to admit he is master at gaining the upper hand and he knocks all our current leading politicians into a cocked-hat. I suspect the whole front row of both the Tories and Labour will have to depart the stage and the new Brexit party and the Lib dems with a younger front bench will take things forward. Almost all of our leading politicians especially in the two main parties are already looking like yesterdays men (and women).

"Taxi to the back benches (or retirement homes) please".

I dunno - I can see an awful lot of Labour and Conservative MP's worried about their jobs in a snap election
 
I dunno - I can see an awful lot of Labour and Conservative MP's worried about their jobs in a snap election

I should think so as well!

So they should despite all the hullabaloo, it was quite simple we had a binary choice, stay or we go. We voted to go!
Since the EU said from day one we cannot negotiate a Trade agreement until the UK leaves, then we should have said ok here's the signed A50 we leave on the 29th March 2019 and then used the time internally (not with the EU) to discuss what happens after that date, if we could not reach an agreement in the HoC to put to the EU then we should have told the EU we are revoking A50 and we have decided to stay.

Then all politicians could have faced the music (electorate) with their dignity intact reap whatever reward the electorate gives them at the next GE. It sounds simple and it was simple, but not it seems to our self serving politicians!
 
I hate to be thankful for a labour victory, but thank goodness they beat off the threat of the Brexit Party, for the time being.
Was it in doubt?. Although Corbyn's reaction towards the press showed the relief and anger he had bottled up.
 
Decimated must one of the most misused words in the World.

Look up what it means before bandying it about.

1 in 10, if either of the main parties were only losing 10% of their voters to the Brexit Party they wouldn't be that worried.

Minor rant over :mad:
 
What's the odds that if Corbyn does not change to campaigning for a 2nd ref that conference is dominated by people trying to change the party position?
There is perhaps a few more weeks fence sitting can be done but not much more than that... Ge or not (and I suspect not) there is going to have to be a decision taken by labour as to if they actively push for a 2nd ref... Will be interesting to see if Corbyn changes stance early or puts up a fight
 
What's the odds that if Corbyn does not change to campaigning for a 2nd ref that conference is dominated by people trying to change the party position?
There is perhaps a few more weeks fence sitting can be done but not much more than that... Ge or not (and I suspect not) there is going to have to be a decision taken by labour as to if they actively push for a 2nd ref... Will be interesting to see if Corbyn changes stance early or puts up a fight
Seems more like McClusky's stance these days.
 
Yeah... Conference will be fun... Suspect it's going to me a (loosing?) Battle to keep referendum motions off the agenda
We've been saying this for the last few but he finds a way to fudge them.
 
Exactly what Labour need right now. To purge from cabinet the people who represent what the membership actually want.
 


An actual member of the shadow cabinet. Even if you think the problem of anti-semitism has been overblown this is fairly clear evidence there are people in the party at a relatively senior level who don't give a feck either way.
 


An actual member of the shadow cabinet. Even if you think the problem of anti-semitism has been overblown this is fairly clear evidence there are people in the party at a relatively senior level who don't give a feck either way.

He said, she hadn't even read the tweet; as if that makes it better.

I do think he is not the sharpest. They shouldn't be sending him out to do interviews.
 
Last edited:
He said, she hadn't even read the tweet"; as if that makes it better.

I do think he is a not the sharpest. They shouldn't be sending him out to do interviews.

Probably not, nah, if I'm thinking of the correct person he's got a habit of committing gaffes. But at the same time if you're a Jewish person in Britain I can see why you'd find this sort of stuff remarkably insidious when it's working it's way up to prominent members in a main party - ignorance/stupidity is often a fairly convenient excuse for people who say and do bad things.
 
I do think he is a not the sharpest. They shouldn't be sending him out to do interviews.
He's actually decent at interviews most the time but yes Barry is a odd one. He's a massive Modi supporter as well. :wenger:
 
Labour talk is a bit of a red herring. They returned pretty poorly here (they've only thrice returned lower in the history of the party) and won the by election as the result of the Brexit vote being split two ways.

That's good news for Labour which will probably replicate nationally (it would be a huge irony if Farage's Brexit party succeeded in getting Labour elected) but the real conversation should be bout the Conservatives. I can't really see how they will look at today's result and conclude anything other than they need to lurch further towards the right.

Oh and :lol: at the CHUK backed candidate finishing behind the Monster Raving Looney party.


No....They won through Postal Votes - a Labour speciality





https://www.change.org/p/men-previo...-were-counted-in-the-peterborough-by-election
 


An actual member of the shadow cabinet. Even if you think the problem of anti-semitism has been overblown this is fairly clear evidence there are people in the party at a relatively senior level who don't give a feck either way.

Tbf in this instance, if her explanation is correct, it makes sense - the captions on fb photos/videos are quite hidden, and you can like the photo without seeing the caption. I" pretty sure I've done it many times.
 
Tbf in this instance, if her explanation is correct, it makes sense - the captions on fb photos/videos are quite hidden, and you can like the photo without seeing the caption. I" pretty sure I've done it many times.

The problem is more the fact that he's equating anti-semitism with snorting a line or two. If his argument was that she didn't know it was anti-semitism then that's different (albeit still problematic) but here the argument seems to suggest that it's alright to be anti-semitic sometimes because the Tories are cnuts as well.
 
The problem is more the fact that he's equating anti-semitism with snorting a line or two. If his argument was that she didn't know it was anti-semitism then that's different (albeit still problematic) but here the argument seems to suggest that it's alright to be anti-semitic sometimes because the Tories are cnuts as well.
the argument is that the problematic thing was the caption not the photo. it's not that she saw the caption and didnt know it was anti-s, it's that she didn't see it at all.

agree abt the 1st part.
 
Is there anything that makes this more than speculation? Brexit Party would've probably gained massively from postal votes too as older people are generally a lot more likely to vote by post and older people like Brexit a lot more than the young.


Probably more than a grain of truth in the claims, I reckon.

Not sure the Brexit Party would have gained much from Postal Votes although it's possible, of course.

But Labour do have previous on Postal Vote Fraud....
 
He said, she hadn't even read the tweet; as if that makes it better.

I do think he is a not the sharpest. They shouldn't be sending him out to do interviews.
Indeed. He learns his brief and parrots it out but when asked a supplementary question he then generally sits there in total confusion for an age until he repeats the same thing again.

Currently all Labour spokespeople have obviously been told to answer the question 'what's your policy on brexit?' with 'it's what was decided at party conference' but at the end of every interview you're somehow left still wondering what it is.
 
Mike Pompeo tells Jewish leaders he would 'push back' against Corbyn


Labour has accused Donald Trump’s top official, Mike Pompeo, of trying to stop Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister, after he was caught on tape telling Jewish leaders that he would “push back” against the party’s leadership.

In a recording leaked to the Washington Post, the US secretary of state was asked what he would do if Corbyn were to be elected as prime minister, after sustained criticism over Labour’s handling of accusations of antisemitism within the party.

The questioner said: “Would you be willing to work with us to take on actions if life becomes very difficult for Jews in the UK?” In response, Pompeo appeared to suggest that he would seek to intervene in the debate before Corbyn had a chance to become prime minister.

“It could be that Mr Corbyn manages to run the gauntlet and get elected,” he said on the recording. “It’s possible. You should know, we won’t wait for him to do those things to begin to push back. We will do our level best. It’s too risky and too important and too hard once it’s already happened.”

A Labour spokesman said: “President Trump and his officials’ attempts to decide who will be Britain’s next prime minister are an entirely unacceptable interference in the UK’s democracy.” He added that the party was “fully committed to the support, defence and celebration of the Jewish community and is implacably opposed to antisemitism in any form”.

Pompeo’s comments emerged after Trump turned down Corbyn’s request for a meeting during his state visit to the UK last week, saying the leader was “somewhat of a negative force”. Corbyn joined protests outside Trump’s press conference with Theresa May, where he pledged to oppose the US president’s drive for greater access for US health companies to NHS contracts.

The comments come at a time when Corbyn’s team are nervous about the latest attempts to oust him from within the party over the issues of antisemitism and Brexit, after several senior figures came out in support of a second referendum.

Shadow cabinet sources said the leadership was preparing to take on Tom Watson and his supporters after his vocal campaign to soften Corbyn’s Brexit position, with moves under way to generate momentum in favour of a new deputy leadership election.

There is growing talk about the possibility of the party’s rules being changed to create a second deputy leader, alongside Watson, but also the possibility of a new deputy leadership contest altogether. Some Corbyn supporters are circulating motions against Watson around local constituency Labour parties and a grassroots petition against the deputy leader has got about 26,000 signatures so far.

One shadow cabinet minister said they believed the leadership wanted to make the shadow cabinet less in favour of a second referendum. As part of this, Corbyn’s team considered swapping Emily Thornberry, the shadow foreign secretary, with Diane Abbott, the home secretary, over her support for a second referendum and wider foreign policy issues.

However, it is understood that Thornberry has more recently been assured that she will not be moved and that Abbott was opposed to such a plan anyway, which would make the move difficult to carry out without a public battle.

A Labour source said there were no plans at all for a reshuffle and dismissed speculation about moves within the top team as mischief-making.

Talk of a reshuffle was sparked when Thornberry was dropped as Corbyn’s usual stand-in for prime minister’s questions this week after speaking out about
Labour’s strategy for the European elections
. On polling day last month, Thornberry said Labour was “not clear on the one single thing that people wanted to hear”. She was replaced at the dispatch box by Rebecca Long-Bailey, a rising star on the left of the party and a staunch Corbyn loyalist.

Jewish Leaders seem very worried about a Corbyn lead party.
 
I can't believe this isn't headline news. The US secretary of state is discussing intervening in British politics to prevent JC from ever becoming PM.
 
The questioner said: “Would you be willing to work with us to take on actions if life becomes very difficult for Jews in the UK?”
Not a loaded question at all!
 
Labour party workers having a ballot over austerity measures... Imposed by labour party

Oooooh Jeremy Corbyn

.
LABOUR-STRIKE-BALLOT-copy.png


Guido understands that after a long-running row over pay, Labour Party staff have formally decided to hold a ballot on strike action. The decision was taken today although the ballot won’t happen immediately. Among those pushing hard for a strike was Mary Robinson – Jeremy Corbyn’s head of economic policy – Robinson apparently said “it doesn’t matter how much it will cost, we need to deliver it.” Much like Labour’s wider economic policies…

Not everyone was quite as enthusiastic, one Unite rep reportedly told staff to “think carefully about this and the harm it will do to the party”. Will Corbyn be going down to the picket line to join the protests against his own party?


https://order-order.com/2019/06/11/labour-staff-formally-decide-hold-ballot-strike-action/
.
More internal trouble in the Labour Party – now the so-called party of workers is facing industrial action from its own staffers. Labour had been in pay negotiations with the GMB and Unite unions since December over staffers’ January pay rise, Labour have struggled to come up with any money to pay them. Labour running out of money? Funny that…

The Labour General Secretary’s final offer to GMB and Unite was revealed this week – an £800 rise per employee. Despite seeing it as a bad offer, both unions recommended staff vote in favour of the limited raise. Normally unions only accept an offer they see as poor if the organisation they’re bargaining with is in financial difficulties…

Yesterday Labour staff rejected the offer by an overwhelming 37-133 votes. Southside sources tell Guido that the atmosphere is “horrific” in the building, threats of taking industrial action are swirling. A full on strike is unlikely, however the party is bracing itself for staffers refusing to work overtime. Pretty drastic considering the party is in the middle of an election campaign…