ti vu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,799
This may go to bigger problem, so I will go brief.
Yes, it's the board fault if theey keep this going. However, Moyes and LVG's sacking is unpreventable. Why? We got the wrong coaches in the first place. Why? Moyes should never bee given the job given his ability. LVG philosophy is too foreign to our own identity. So in correcting the previous mistake, a big problem has been created in the dressing room with player power growing and they have learned a bad behavior by bypassing the manager and go to thee press... This is what I said should be stopped and be corrected now to how it used to be under SAF.
Here is SAF's quote
“The minute a Manchester United player thought he was bigger than the manager, he had to go. I used to say, ‘The moment the manager loses his authority, you don’t have a club. The players will be running it, and then you’re in trouble.”
SAF often used the press to spin thing into his view and push his agenda on the matter. It's a tactic used to manage, too. It's a myth that you can always sit down together and talk. Reading SAF's feud with players from his narrative and players' narrative, you can see how these people at times didn't talk to each other but playing a chess game using the press... The winner would be decided by the support from the outside gathered by the press... In the past more often than not, for this club the support lies with the boss than with the player despite the player may be the victim (Stam)
This is entertaining read:
https://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/comments/4jtt4q/in_their_own_words_the_breakdown_between_david/
Yes, it's the board fault if theey keep this going. However, Moyes and LVG's sacking is unpreventable. Why? We got the wrong coaches in the first place. Why? Moyes should never bee given the job given his ability. LVG philosophy is too foreign to our own identity. So in correcting the previous mistake, a big problem has been created in the dressing room with player power growing and they have learned a bad behavior by bypassing the manager and go to thee press... This is what I said should be stopped and be corrected now to how it used to be under SAF.
Here is SAF's quote
“The minute a Manchester United player thought he was bigger than the manager, he had to go. I used to say, ‘The moment the manager loses his authority, you don’t have a club. The players will be running it, and then you’re in trouble.”
SAF often used the press to spin thing into his view and push his agenda on the matter. It's a tactic used to manage, too. It's a myth that you can always sit down together and talk. Reading SAF's feud with players from his narrative and players' narrative, you can see how these people at times didn't talk to each other but playing a chess game using the press... The winner would be decided by the support from the outside gathered by the press... In the past more often than not, for this club the support lies with the boss than with the player despite the player may be the victim (Stam)
But then that is the board's fault, isn't it? Each time the players didn't respond to the manager, they sacked the manager. By doing this, they did create a model similar to Chelsea and Madrid.
In any case, going to the press doesn't really help. We already know our club's struggles run deeper than either players or the manager and can't really do anything about it since we are not a fan-owned club.
I hope Mourinho goes and cries in front of Glazers as well as he does in front of us. Then again, maybe he does communicate with the Glazers through the press..
This is entertaining read:
https://www.reddit.com/r/reddevils/comments/4jtt4q/in_their_own_words_the_breakdown_between_david/
Last edited: