NinjaZombie
Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2011
- Messages
- 10,222
Surely he has to realise by now that his philosophy doesn't work in England, for whatever reasons?
I know a year and a half is a long time but if you can cast your mind back that far and remember his caretaker spell he was regularly out on the touch line. The whole criticism of Giggs for not doing things he can't or for supposedly thinking things he's never said baffles me.If we take as fact, then Giggs is also spineless for not challenging LVG on this. He'll never be a manager if he just sits there and does what he's told.
Some moan in the other thread about LVG not stalking the sidelines - Giggs doesn't do it either.
Which all just makes me stay with the opinion that Giggs isn't a 'leader' at all.
I know a year and a half is a long time but if you can cast your mind back that far and remember his caretaker spell he was regularly out on the touch line. The whole criticism of Giggs for not doing things he can't or for supposedly thinking things he's never said baffles me.
It was Van Gaal who sold or loaned out all our attackers. We can argue all day long about whether they had the quality required but it's better than nothing or Fellaini thrown on up front.Bullshit that is. We lack the quality up front, the fact we are relying on a 19 year old lad to produce the magic emphasises that. You can't blame everything on tactics, we need at least two attacking players to come in.
Then your problems are greater than just memory.Your post is difficult to read.
Your last line though - what's stopping him doing that now? You think Van Gaal will be angry?
Which would almost be alright if the ends justified the means. They aren't though.I get that hes a pragmatic and puts results above all else, but Jesus Christ this is some boring shite
Then your problems are greater than just memory.
It's not his job. He isn't the manager and he can't go around publicly undermining them by deciding he's going to manage them from the touch lines.
Ok. You came along with the confrontational posting not me. Why would he have done it as the manager and not as assistant if it isn't how he wants to do things? Perhaps Alex Ferguson had a slightly more democratic approach.FS, put away your handbag.
Your point makes no sense. He's not allowed to say anything to the players?! Pretty sure Ferguson's coaches did all the time.
I wouldn't worry about that. They'll disappear after a while. At least it was that way in the Bayern boards. All his disciples predicted in 2011 that the club will regret kicking van Gaal out and that we won't ever be successful in Europe with Heynckes. They vanished soon enough.What annoys me is that when he does leave and a superior manager does come in here and we start playing better football, they'll still be disciples telling us that the the philosophy has finally come into fruition like it did at Barca and Bayern.
He's struggling, and one who thinks rationally can see that. Its not just that we didnt beat Palace, but for the majority of his tenure here all we have seen is dour football.
Don't buy that in it's entirety. If Giggs doesn't like what he sees and given his position (assistant manager) is quite high up - we should be hearing murmurs about disagreements between the two (behind the scenes).
If Giggs is just sitting there seething but not actually saying anything, well then he's not likely to be a good manager at all in my view.
Wants us to have more possesion of the ball.
What the hell has possession got to do with it. It chances created that matter.
You clearly don't understand the process.What the hell has possession got to do with it. It chances created that matter.
What the hell has possession got to do with it. It chances created that matter.
We don't press high and pen other teams back in the way Bayern Munich and Barcelona do. We're awful to watch, and the results aren't good enough for the money that's been spent. I can't mention Wayne Rooney without feeling my blood pressure rise so I'll just say what I'd like to see happen once again: do a deal with Guardiola now and give him whatever he needs to bring in the players he needs in the summer. Van Gaal is clearly not the right man to bring us back to the top; he's not even the right one to make us play attractive football. We either act now or we fall behind City and Arsenal.
He's 110% deluded. It's the only explanation. We've got a madman in charge.
I wouldn't worry about that. They'll disappear after a while. At least it was that way in the Bayern boards. All his disciples predicted in 2011 that the club will regret kicking van Gaal out and that we won't ever be successful in Europe with Heynckes. They vanished soon enough.
There was a lot more talk about van Gaal's influence in Bayern's treble on the Caf the last 18 months than between Bayern fans over the last 4 years.
In his philosophy , more possesion means more ability to create chances. I remember us having over 70% possession at the Bridge and we still lost and didnt come close to scoring that day either.What the hell has possession got to do with it. It chances created that matter.
I suspect posters have mentioned this already but I can't be bothered to check.
If Mourinho is sacked, would you like him to replace LvG?
He's a far better manager than LVG(has never lost to him btw, and tactically schooled him in that UCL final).I suspect posters have mentioned this already but I can't be bothered to check.
If Mourinho is sacked, would you like him to replace LvG?
Not in a month of Sundays.I suspect posters have mentioned this already but I can't be bothered to check.
If Mourinho is sacked, would you like him to replace LvG?
No. We already have a pragmatic, defensive minded manager in charge. We need an attacking minded manager.I suspect posters have mentioned this already but I can't be bothered to check.
If Mourinho is sacked, would you like him to replace LvG?
Biggest disappointment about him is how he was made to be a tough man with big balls in terms of making decisions.