Name Changed
weso26
yep, yesterday Palace demolished that theory
LVG is deluded, completely full of shit. I don't listen to anything he says anymore.
yep, yesterday Palace demolished that theory
We will see if Scholes rocks up on Tuesday. But if it's true LVG needs to look closer to 'home' at Giggs and Rooney - I may be wrong, but I feel sure those two are doing subtle damage behind the scenes.That's all I can think, but if it is true as you say, then the only people feeding Scholes would be Giggs or Rooney you would have thought. If that has happened LvG has real problems on his hands. Papers like stirring up trouble though. You would imagine if he is there with BT on Tuesday it is all balderdash.
I genuinely believe the van gaal way is whats ruining attacking players.
Memphis - ruined and in bad form
Rooney - ruined and looks finished now
Di maria - ruined and shackled.
Martial - 3 in 3 as a striker, lvg's system meant he had to then start playing as a winger. Hasnt scored since.
Young - doesnt get games
Januzaj - scored and looked decent but was then shipped off.
Like seriously Van Gaal is 100% the problem. Im worried that even if we bought Griezmann and whoever else, they would all go the same way. I think its more important to sign a new manager before we go to town on new attackers. Unless we all enjoyed the Di Maria situation?
Trophies or not, I want MUFC back
Exactly. The guys vision is shocking. Plus completely contradicts the clubs dna. Plus the idea of employing him to steady the ship after moyes could easily backfire with this Rooney love in, leaving the dressing room feeling hard done by.How is it that City, Arsenal and Chelsea (last season) can 'get away' with one holding midfielder and a much more attack-minded CM partner, as part of a midfield two, yet LVG believes we must persists with two very deep midfielders? It doesn't make sense.
How is it that City, Arsenal and Chelsea (last season) can 'get away' with one holding midfielder and a much more attack-minded CM partner, as part of a midfield two, yet LVG believes we must persists with two very deep midfielders? It doesn't make sense.
So you could say he isn't structuring his system to the players he has? Rather he is trying to get them to play a system they aren't capable of playing. Also from that, for all he says he listens to the players, he listens but doesn't change his strategy even if it isn't working.This is what Lahm wrote in his book:
“We almost fell apart defensively… Van Gaal’s system focused only on possession, but never ball desire… We lost the ball for a variety of reasons and made it easy for our opponents to get goalscoring opportunities… I talked about my concerns with him often, but he always decided for what he felt was right. And he didn’t have any doubts in either himself or his system… A modern trainer needs to lead his team, but he can’t bind his players against their will to a style that the team isn’t suited to… A tactical system is ultimately only as good as the players can carry it out, and the great art of a modern trainer lies in the ability to devise a system that is suited to their players. Consistency and reliability are marks of a team in which every player knows their responsibility and what their personal strengths can bring to the system… Our defense had neither consistency nor reliability… Every pass had to focus on possession, and every possession of the team the players had to, through their own individual creativity, create a goalscoring opportunity… Even the goalkeeper wasn’t allowed to pass long, but rather had to open the game up forwards with a controlled first pass.”
How is it that City, Arsenal and Chelsea (last season) can 'get away' with one holding midfielder and a much more attack-minded CM partner, as part of a midfield two, yet LVG believes we must persists with two very deep midfielders? It doesn't make sense.
He had different players, plus he had a Ribery and a Robben and a Muller. We have none of them. The defensive side is working to an extent, but some of it is down to DDG and like most teams get sometimes, a bit of luck.To be fair, though, he did lead Bayern to a league title and a CL final. The system obviously worked quite well then. I mean that sounds exactly like what's going on with us, so it's hard to say exactly what's going wrong.
‘Of course I want to be a champion, but it is not so easy. There can only be one each year. You should never be too disappointed when you have done everything you can to reach a certain level. It is not only the result that counts, the way you play can be almost as important.”
More and more I think Van Gaal is clearly the manager that's great for younger players, a team that's lost it's way and a team that needs to remember the fundamentals that will get you 80% of the way to success.
I just don't think he's the manager to actually win anything.
Because unlike the teams you mentioned, we don't have a strong firepower, we have to rely on a solid defense. At least we think we do.
I think our attack would instantly go up some levels if we adopted systems more like those teams - especially City and Arsenal.
Even if we ignore the alchemy built by our opponents with time, we do not have the same quality players by players, positions by positions.
Giroud is a better goalscorer than Martial.(based on past achievement)
Aguero is a better striker than Martial.
Sterling is better than all our wingers.
Alexis Sanchez is better than all our wingers.
Ramsey is as good as Mata.
Ozil is better than all our #10 options.
De Bruyne is better than all our players.
Silva is better than all our players.
I agree with all the critics aimed at LVG but we need to comeback to earth and look closely at our roster, we do not have a top roster, it's a pretty good roster and an other manager could definitely make us more pleasing to watch. But the other managers will have to take some drastic decisions like dropping Rooney and Herrera/Mata, for some of our youngsters and pray that they can actually score goals in the PL because if you play adventurously you have to score otherwise we will lose regularly. It's not a mystery why SAF was always after guaranteed goalscorers.
I'm not saying our attack is as good as those teams, I'm just saying it would improve if we played like those teams. Which it would. There are plenty of teams with weaker attacks on paper that are much better at attacking than us.
I have to ask why you think so? Seen a few mention this and I'm not saying you're wrong, but if Rooney really is finished at this level why would Giggs or whoever else continue playing him? Your less likely to succeed and make your job even more difficult.The worst thing on sacking LVG and appointing Giggs is that we would stick with Rooney...
We've been mostly mediocre since the beginning of last season. I can only remember a few very good performances during his reign. We would not have got 4th place had it not been the form of De Gea. Fans were only patient expecting him to turn performances around. He's now mostly got the personnel he requested and still no signs of any great improvement in playing style.As much as I'm not particularly impressed by LVG right now, I do think there are a lot of kneejerk, reactionary posts based on our last three games. If we now get a couple of wins, I expect this thread will suddenly have a massively different feel to it again.
And where are they on the table?
I'm just completely lost in thinking how he can spend £250 million but assembled such a poor team
One of them is ahead of us. One of them is one point below us.
Are you saying the only way we can consolidate a top 4 position is by persisting with this dross?
'Cause I don't buy that for one second. We could play better, we should play better. A bit more adventure and we'd have beaten City and Newcastle.
No, I'm telling you that, you don't build your team around your weakest link, if you intend to finish high in the league. I mean you do realize that for LVG the mission is to end high in the league, even I, who pretend that the style is primordial, will ask for his head if we don't finish in the top 4.
No, I'm telling you that you don't build your team around your weakest link, if you intend to finish high in the league. I mean you do realize that for LVG the mission is to end high in the league, even I, who pretend that the style is primordial, will ask for his head if we don't finish in the top 4.
People were questioning our football even when we were squeezing results too.As much as I'm not particularly impressed by LVG right now, I do think there are a lot of kneejerk, reactionary posts based on our last three games. If we now get a couple of wins, I expect this thread will suddenly have a massively different feel to it again.
He should go if we finish below 3rd.
IMO he has made some fecking awful decisions and if we fail to get top3 it is his fault. Squad is so fecking light because of the choices he has made.
We've been mostly mediocre since the beginning of last season. I can only remember a few very good performances during his reign. We would not have got 4th place had it not been the form of De Gea. Fans were only patient expecting him to turn performances around. He's now mostly got the personnel he requested and still no signs of any great improvement in playing style.
Pretty much this. How can our forward line be so devoid of talent after spending all the fecking money.
He is responsible for his choices, but at the same time he had to replace way to many players, and the club is responsible for that. You can take the club that you want and you will see that the transfers success rate is closer to 50% than 100%. You can't let all your key players decline at the same time, you have to gradually replace them when they are still good players, look at Carrick now that he is past it we have to bring Fellaini on.
Yes, we spent 250m but every fans who follow football knows that in 2 or 3 years, it will be confirmed that at least 100m were thrown through the windows.
Having to replace ADM is entirely his own fault.
becuse it becomes "habbit" to give him another chance.. Fergie wanted him out and spotted he was on decline. Moyes decided to give him monster contract while he didn't desrve even the third of it.. Van Gaal naturaly won't write of player of his reputation when he's 29, he surely didn't see all his games past 5 years to say how he declined... the next mnager will surely want to try his things wth Rooney too. If Van Gaal stays three years I am sure the third year he will try to drop him or even sell him if he's sane butif he's sacked now, another manager won't surely do such big decisions like selling dropping rooney.. Rooney know giggs t's his friend. He was kinda naive when he took over from Moyes for 4 games he turned it around and played Young and Valencia in worst of forms, also gave chance to Lawrence and Wilo but he stick to experienced players first which Rooney is.. so we must only hope Giggs will surprise us or Va Gaal gets rid off Rooney asap..I have to ask why you think so? Seen a few mention this and I'm not saying you're wrong, but if Rooney really is finished at this level why would Giggs or whoever else continue playing him? Your less likely to succeed and make your job even more difficult.
D'you think crowd will go against his captain? I don't go to games so I don't know what's the mood at OT but I heard how they are behind their manager. But booing Rooney from its crowd could be good to start with, well it was fans who cried to play Rooney in his natural positions up front and the gaffer heard it..Wait a few more games and the home crowd will make the decision easier for any manager by booing Rooney off.