Luis Nani | 2012/13 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
This might Sir Alex's cunning way of getting Nani's head back on track and sign a new contract.
 
If figures are to be believed he is on a surprisingly low salary. So one would assume he's after a substantial increase and the other side of the coin is, it'd be a fair comment to say we could do with a bit more consistency from him. Ideally, would love a more consistent Nani and give him what he wants.
 
Funny how many people here actuallly want him to leave.

And I expected it tbf.

Why would any United fan want one of our best players to leave? People are just trying to get their head around what could be happening.
 
Funny how many people here actuallly want him to leave.

And I expected it tbf.

Without me reading through the last 10 or so pages, would you care to point out who wants him to leave.

Some are saying it will be a disgrace others are being a bit realistic about it and wondering why.

If it happens, it happens. But I would prefer a positive outcome for all.
 
If figures are to be believed he is on a surprisingly low salary. So one would assume he's after a substantial increase and the other side of the coin is, it'd be a fair comment to say we could do with a bit more consistency from him. Ideally, would love a more consistent Nani and give him what he wants.

Hes on 90k, wanted 120 that turned down. Now he wants 90 k plus 30 for each start he makes. Reasonable numbres imo
 
Thing is if we were going to sell him right now doesn't make sense. There's no replacement in for him, if that's what Hazard and Lucas were meant to be and it's unlikely we could find anyone in between now and Firday. Unlikely to get anyone of quality in jan due to them likely being cup tied. So we'd have to wait till next season. Dropping him from the team, if we are trying to sell him, again doesn't really put us in a strong bargaining position. Hope it's just b.s. really, the papers came out with rumours that we'd sell Rooney as well after he was on the bench but I doubt that's the case.
 
Hes on 90k, wanted 120 that turned down. Now he wants 90 k plus 30 for each start he makes. Reasonable numbres imo

This is what has been reported, but how do we know he has not asked for stipulations like he must start every week, or that he wants a get out clause etc…

There are two sides to everything. And I must say the more realistic thing for me is that Nani is making the problems
 
"Being dropped" is not exactly any sort of judgement in our squad... it just means you're in rotation. Were Young or Hernandez"dropped" for our last match? Etc.

Not many players exempt from rotation in our squad (usually only Rooney, Vidic, Evra...)

Still think it was squad rotation?
 
In the programme notes for Fulham Fergie said this:



But it seems that pretty much every article out there is linking that to Rooney with them saying that he's going to be leaving. I thought those comments were about Nani.

could he not be talking about Berbatov? :angel:
 
Without me reading through the last 10 or so pages, would you care to point out who wants him to leave.

Some are saying it will be a disgrace others are being a bit realistic about it and wondering why.

If it happens, it happens. But I would prefer a positive outcome for all.

Realistic without actually knowing the truth and based on assumption and speculation?
 
It's more so a 'why the feck would we sell him in the first place?'. I see no point to it, we only have 3 wingers and he's an excellent player. It'd be a daft decision from Fergie, I'd be disgusted to see him leave.

How can you make that judgement without knowing the potential reasons?
 
Still think it was squad rotation?

Being dropped for a game is also not the end of the world.

Also need to remember that he played a lot in the Euro's and could be a little fatigued.Not just physical but mental too.

And that's what his performance showed in last game imo.
 
Hes on 90k, wanted 120 that turned down. Now he wants 90 k plus 30 for each start he makes. Reasonable numbres imo


these are the numbers I've read about too but as usual, pure guesswork.

Don't really see any problem here - he'll sign.

media:rolleyes:
 
Of course he will sign, there is no way United will let Nani leave. Players around the league get dropped all the time for many reasons.

anyway, on a side note...to my knowledge, I don't think any team has enquired about him have they???
 
If any of Hazard or Moura had signed United would have been looking for buyers. He is still here because those transfers failed to materialise. Nani must have felt unwanted. The poor soul.

United still only have 3 genuine wingers including Nani. Seems a bit light to go through a season with 2.



As for Everton being the last straw thats been going around 'not directed at you sultan', that's horseshit. First game of the fecking season and apparently that was it...
 
United still only have 3 genuine wingers including Nani. Seems a bit light to go through a season with 2.



As for Everton being the last straw thats been going around 'not directed at you sultan', that's horseshit. First game of the fecking season and apparently that was it...

Players are entitled to have poor games.

It's not the Everton game or being omitted for Fulham game which brought about the speculation. It was our interest in signing Hazard and Moura.
 
Is the media creating the rumours here, or is it this forum? Rumours will inevitably surface each time a big player isn't played, but he has two years left on his contract, and United has gone into a new policiy where they don't negotiate a player's contract before it only has one year left - hopefully they have rebuked that now as it is complete and utter bullocks.

Nani had a poor match against Everton, but he looked sharp in pre-season and had a good Euros too. I wouldn't worry too much.
 
Is the media creating the rumours here, or is it this forum? Rumours will inevitably surface each time a big player isn't played, but he has two years left on his contract, and United has gone into a new policiy where they don't negotiate a player's contract before it only has one year left - hopefully they have rebuked that now as it is complete and utter bullocks.

Nani had a poor match against Everton, but he looked sharp in pre-season and had a good Euros too. I wouldn't worry too much.

That is not true. This "new" policy supposedly started a few years ago and since then quite a few players have renewed contracts who have more than 1 year left.

In February The Sun said United were going to open contract talks this summer to boost Nani's wages to 130k. The player and the club have been in talks - it has been confirmed by Nani - but a few months later we're still seemingly nowhere near to something being agreed. There's not that long left till the close of the transfer window so this should be sorted one way or another in the next few days and while nothing has been agreed and the club aren't saying that he's not for sale, the rumours will just keep on growing like they have done.
 
That policy is for players over 30 I believe. Everyone else we dont like them getting within 2 years
 
That policy is for players over 30 I believe. Everyone else we dont like them getting within 2 years

Yep. There was media bollocks a few years ago where they said that policy would be extended to all players and not just the over 30s but apart from a few examples over the last year or two it hasn't really been the case.
 
The one problem with reading too much into this quote

"If I hear that a player has fallen out of love with us and is looking elsewhere I invariably help them out the door."

Is that it is an incomplete quote, people are only looking at half the quote. I believe what he said was

“I really respect players who clearly want to play for us. And it has always influenced me when it comes to deciding who we should go for. The reverse is equally true for me because if I hear that a player has fallen out of love with us and is looking elsewhere I invariably help them out the door.”

Perhaps a much different statement. Of course the question I have is was he responding to a question from someone or did he just make the quote out of the blue? If he was asked a question, then what was the question, and then let's take the answer in that context.
 
The one problem with reading too much into this quote



Is that it is an incomplete quote, people are only looking at half the quote. I believe what he said was



Perhaps a much different statement. Of course the question I have is was he responding to a question from someone or did he just make the quote out of the blue? If he was asked a question, then what was the question, and then let's take the answer in that context.

Throws a different light on it, interesting how this was linked with Nani and Rooney so heavily, but noone thought to use the full quote. As you say it really depends on whether he was asked a question which prompted that response.
 
Selling makes absolutely no sense at all, in any way. The reasons that are being thrown about seem to be..

-Maybe he wants to leave?...Well a couple of months ago he was saying how happy he was here, how he wanted to sign a new contract, and stay at United for his career.

He's inconsistent? So are many of our players. Rooney's the most inconsistent player in the team, yet he's the golden boy who gets the £200K contract. Why would Fergie decide that Nani's inconsistency is enough to warrent selling him? Surely we'd have to sell Young, Hernandez, Welbeck, Rafael, Smalling, Jones et el too then? And hell, how would Anderson still be a Manchester United player?

He's not good enough? :lol: That doesn't even deserve an answer.

Selling him would be a massive step back, after all this Summers business, and a massive mistake from Fergie.
 
I still think its the usual contract signing bs.
He is very good.. He has said he wants to stay.. they'll negotiate for a bit and then agree.. till then, the papers have something to write about.
 
I wouldn't sell Nani, that would be silly in my opinion, unless we had someone as good or better to replace him. If we had of signed Hazard, then fair enough. I didn't really understand the Lucas Moura bid, an unknown player as such when it comes to playing in a top league, when having proven PL wingers such as Nani at the club.

Nani's stats say he is consistent, but the stats can be misleading. Like Rooney, he seems to do his stuff in streaks. Rooney's stats make him look consistent as well, I don't personally think he is. When Nani/Rooney are playing poorly, they often look horrendous.

No way would I get rid of either of them. Nani is too good of a player to let go. He can be brilliant when in top form.
 
Hope we don't make the mistake of letting him go elsewhere. Would loved to have seen out there against Fulham - with the likes of Kagawa, Cleverely, Evra that day we'd have been some threat on both flanks.

I think he is going to really excel at the quick passing game that comes when we have the CM we did on Saturday. Hopefully Everton game is just put aside and he starts the next couple of games.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2194473/Zenit-hope-sign-Nani-25million.html

Zenit St Petersburg are pursuing a £25m bid for Manchester United winger Nani, who has yet to agree a new contract at Old Trafford.

The Portugal player’s representatives reportedly met Zenit counterparts in Amsterdam on Monday to outline a deal.

'The news about Nani is true,' Zenit coach Luciano Spalletti said earlier this month.

'Everything will depend on how much players cost because we won’t pay excessive amounts of money.'

When asked whether Zenit had made a bid, he said: “I’m not talking about an offer to a particular player, but an offer to a club.'
 
Oh my god is this really happening? feck sake. Why can't we just have a summer of happiness in regards to the transfer window for once? Why do we always have to get rid of players we have gotten attached to emotionally. feck sake.
 
Those quotes are from weeks ago. He also said he's interested in Messi.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.