Luka Modric / Signs for Real Madrid

I reckon he will cost between £35m and £40m.
 
We should put in £30m. They'll want more than that, but it'll show we're not fecking around like Chelsea.
 
So selling Modric is the only solution?

Cash in 27-28 mill and just move on like nothing has happened. Turn the page and then just buy a new MF or a better top forward. Couldn't be easier....to be continuously successful.

If I'm not mistaken (hmm...have to trust the papers)it was Bale who said if they sell Modric his gone. And then the domino bricks falls. Doesn't sound like a good option to me. Loose their two best players in a heart beat and then convince remaining players, supporters, sponsors, media and new prospects that is business as usual. Boom chacalack!!

When someone come's up with a realistic and better option then I will be convinced and accepts my shortcomings. Until then I'm stubborn and a reactionary old man.

Bale has never said that he'd leave if Modric did, that was just paper talk.

The problem is that you, and Levy, are not treating Modric as a player, you're making him into an icon, a symbol of where the club is.

Anyone who does this is due for a fall.
 
The problem is that you, and Levy, are not treating Modric as a player, you're making him into an icon, a symbol of where the club is.

Anyone who does this is due for a fall.

Well then I'm not the only one..
Arsene Wenger last night admitted Arsenal "can no longer be called a big club" if they sell Cesc Fabregas and Samir Nasri.

"Imagine the worst situation - we lose Fabregas and Nasri - you cannot convince people you are ambitious after that," he said.

"I believe for us it is important the message we give out"

"If you give that message out, you cannot pretend you are a big club, because a big club first of all holds onto its big players and gives a message out to all the other big clubs that they just cannot come in and take away from you."



And another thing is that you haven't understood a single bit if you think this is about "making him into a icon" and your claims about "you are not treating him as a player".

Not only are you clueless and insulting you also take a moral high ground based on your own assumptions. Earlier in this thread I thought you could contribute with different opinions. I was wrong. You have one opinion and now when I see your true colors and that you so consistent slag off Daniel Levy, like he was a cheap plantage owner, give's me an indication where you come from.

I truly respect your knowledge about football, you have showed in the past that you know your stuff, but when it comes to understanding how to run the economical side of a football club you seems to lack basic knowledge.

In the end, maybe this window or next summer, Levy will probably sell Modric for a fee the club find acceptable but it will be on his conditions. And that's how it should be if you respects a legal correct contact.
 
Well then I'm not the only one..

And another thing is that you haven't understood a single bit if you think this is about "making him into a icon" and your claims about "you are not treating him as a player".

Not only are you clueless and insulting you also take a moral high ground based on your own assumptions. Earlier in this thread I thought you could contribute with different opinions. I was wrong. You have one opinion and now when I see your true colors and that you so consistent slag off Daniel Levy, like he was a cheap plantage owner, give's me an indication where you come from.

I truly respect your knowledge about football, you have showed in the past that you know your stuff, but when it comes to understanding how to run the economical side of a football club you seems to lack basic knowledge.

In the end, maybe this window or next summer, Levy will probably sell Modric for a fee the club find acceptable but it will be on his conditions. And that's how it should be if you respects a legal correct contact.

Wenger is probably right if they lost both players, but just losing one it wouldn't hold true.

I haven't been insulting to you once? Why does it bother you what I say about Levy? The 'slaver' jibe was firmly tongue in cheek.

As for the economical side, I haven't addressed it once in this thread, other than re the fee, so another odd comment with no real basis.
 
It's a fine balance. Success on the pitch, and financial responsibility.

It's no surprise Harry and Arsene coming out with statements wanting to keep their best players. They're the ones who are going to be judged on results on the field. However, it has to make economic sense.

Edit: Too many clubs have fallen into the trap of listening to their football managers and are now struggling.
 

Its quite evident to me.. That is definitely a come and put in a bigger bid appeal.. I am sure Spurs would rather get rid of a player that doesn't want to play for them rather than keep him at their helm.. That is my opinion on it..

Fully expecting Glaston to try and give a very logical explanation to prove how I am mis-interpreting it..
 
It's a fine balance. Success on the pitch, and financial responsibility.

It's no surprise Harry and Arsene coming out with statements wanting to keep their best players. They're the ones who are going to be judged on results on the field. However, it has to make economic sense.

Edit: Too many clubs have fallen into the trap of listening to their football managers and are now struggling.



A person who claims this is a easy decision with only one outcome has probably never been in a situation like this. Even Fergie himself struggled when Rooney had his moments.
 
Arry's comments on SSN yesterday in his car was those of a man who knows Modric is off, only a matter of time before he joins Chelsea I'm afraid :(
 
I had a dream that we bought Modric and Daniel Levy.
 
I had a dream that we bought Modric and Daniel Levy.
In the psychological language of dreams, this type of "buying" is well known for symbolising homo-erotic desires.

Desires for homo-erotic threesomes are somewhat more unusual, but nothing to be unduly worried about.
 
What percentage of Modric's fee will Harry be getting?
The answer is 'x' where ....

quad_ex237.gif
 
Sorry, clicked on that link, followed it to a report of Liverpool's first pre-season friendly, and within seconds I'd seen the phrase 'their was a pleasing cameo from ...' Seriously, paid to write. Give me a break. Pfffffff
 
I am not a betting man. But the bet certainly has made this thread more fun. Good on all of ya.
 
You lot need to realize that transfer request doesn't actually do anything.
 
Except it normally means that the player doesn't get a portion of the transfer fee(I think).

Yes, still means nothing as it'd virtually only guarantee a fee 5% higher than normal.
 
I hope he stays at Tottenham because selling Modric would be a massive backward step for the club.........but like i`ve said many times he`ll 100% leave Tottenham in the summer.

I reckon he will leave the club in the last week or even last day of the transfer window because Levy doesn't want to give Bale & Van Der Vaart too much time to consider making transfer requests of their own on the back of Modric`s departure, the fee will be higher and Tottenham had enough time to looking for replacements.