This. £27m still seems quite far off the going rate.I reckon he will cost between £35m and £40m.
So selling Modric is the only solution?
Cash in 27-28 mill and just move on like nothing has happened. Turn the page and then just buy a new MF or a better top forward. Couldn't be easier....to be continuously successful.
If I'm not mistaken (hmm...have to trust the papers)it was Bale who said if they sell Modric his gone. And then the domino bricks falls. Doesn't sound like a good option to me. Loose their two best players in a heart beat and then convince remaining players, supporters, sponsors, media and new prospects that is business as usual. Boom chacalack!!
When someone come's up with a realistic and better option then I will be convinced and accepts my shortcomings. Until then I'm stubborn and a reactionary old man.
We should put in £30m. They'll want more than that, but it'll show we're not fecking around like Chelsea.
The problem is that you, and Levy, are not treating Modric as a player, you're making him into an icon, a symbol of where the club is.
Anyone who does this is due for a fall.
Arsene Wenger last night admitted Arsenal "can no longer be called a big club" if they sell Cesc Fabregas and Samir Nasri.
"Imagine the worst situation - we lose Fabregas and Nasri - you cannot convince people you are ambitious after that," he said.
"I believe for us it is important the message we give out"
"If you give that message out, you cannot pretend you are a big club, because a big club first of all holds onto its big players and gives a message out to all the other big clubs that they just cannot come in and take away from you."
"If they are going to make an improved offer, I would think they need to," Redknapp told Sky Sports News. "Twenty-two million pounds for Luka Modric would be a joke if he was for sale.
Well then I'm not the only one..
And another thing is that you haven't understood a single bit if you think this is about "making him into a icon" and your claims about "you are not treating him as a player".
Not only are you clueless and insulting you also take a moral high ground based on your own assumptions. Earlier in this thread I thought you could contribute with different opinions. I was wrong. You have one opinion and now when I see your true colors and that you so consistent slag off Daniel Levy, like he was a cheap plantage owner, give's me an indication where you come from.
I truly respect your knowledge about football, you have showed in the past that you know your stuff, but when it comes to understanding how to run the economical side of a football club you seems to lack basic knowledge.
In the end, maybe this window or next summer, Levy will probably sell Modric for a fee the club find acceptable but it will be on his conditions. And that's how it should be if you respects a legal correct contact.
Bizarre.
It's a fine balance. Success on the pitch, and financial responsibility.
It's no surprise Harry and Arsene coming out with statements wanting to keep their best players. They're the ones who are going to be judged on results on the field. However, it has to make economic sense.
Edit: Too many clubs have fallen into the trap of listening to their football managers and are now struggling.
In the psychological language of dreams, this type of "buying" is well known for symbolising homo-erotic desires.I had a dream that we bought Modric and Daniel Levy.
Yes.Hasn't Dawson has rejected this news on the Spurs OS?
The answer is 'x' where ....What percentage of Modric's fee will Harry be getting?
You'd be better off pitying the suckers who've been dumb enough to bet with me ... you're more than welcome to join them.
Oh, poor Glaston.
You lot need to realize that transfer request doesn't actually do anything.
Except it normally means that the player doesn't get a portion of the transfer fee(I think).
Except it normally means that the player doesn't get a portion of the transfer fee(I think).