Manchester United v Arsenal

We have the best away record.

You will hit us on the counter... and probably win, and we will talk about how we played all over you on your ground but were robbed... just warning everyone now.

I want 3 points and large chocolate thickshake please.

Define playing all over us on our ground.
As I have said, the quality of possession is more important than the quantity. One incisive pass to open up the defense beats ten to-and-fro passes in the middle of nowhere.
I would think that the team that created more/better goalscoring opportunities had the upper hand in the game and deserves to get a result.
 
:lol: @ the Arse fans complaining about our injury crisis evaporating.

For the record, Ferguson hadn't ever ruled anyone out. He always said that he was hopeful on Ferdinand, for instance.
 
Define playing all over us on our ground.
As I have said, the quality of possession is more important than the quantity. One incisive pass to open up the defense beats ten to-and-fro passes in the middle of nowhere.
I would think that the team that created more/better goalscoring opportunities had the upper hand in the game and deserves to get a result.

Arsene Wenger's disciples will never appreciate that point.
 
Based on our recently postponed game i suppose.
.

Based on what exactly? your %100 assumption / arrogance you would have beaten Blackpool

No way you could assume that, especially the way results have gone this season

Would it have been the greatest surprise had you gone there and dropped two points or even all three given your form away this season ?- I don't think so
 
Based on what exactly? your %100 assumption / arrogance you would have beaten Blackpool

No way you could assume that, especially the way results have gone this season

Would it have been the greatest surprise had you gone there and dropped two points or even all three given your form away this season ?- I don't think so

Well we both know what happens when you start trying to think Jopub, so we'll leave it there.
 
:lol: @ the Arse fans complaining about our injury crisis evaporating.

For the record, Ferguson hadn't ever ruled anyone out. He always said that he was hopeful on Ferdinand, for instance.

Grant Wilson Goal.com

Scholes has not featured for United since the 1-0 victory over Rangers in the Champions League last month and now Ferguson believes the veteran is a doubt to face the Gunners.

The former England star was expected to feature in United’s 1-1 draw against Valencia on Tuesday, but after a setback in training the United boss feels that he will not be able to call upon the influential midfielder.

"Paul tried training on Sunday and came off," Ferguson told MUTV.

"He will be doubtful for next Monday."
__

SCHOLES DOUBT FOR ARSENAL CLASH By Simon Stone, Press Association Sport Chief Football Writer Sporting Life


mmm.. for instance :lol:

Personally the 11 on the pitch matter so it's down to them and not people that wont be there

Scholes will be there but I'd be surprised to see Fabregas gotta be 50/50 with him
 
Based on what exactly? your %100 assumption / arrogance you would have beaten Blackpool

No way you could assume that, especially the way results have gone this season

Would it have been the greatest surprise had you gone there and dropped two points or even all three given your form away this season ?- I don't think so

No, but the best team in the league drops the fewest points.
 
I still think that we're gonna use that type of formation like we played against Spurs at WHL Last season.
 
For some reason I think we're gunna play that 442 ish system with Rooney and Berbatov up front and Park from the left but really playing quite centrally.
 
Do you want to bet that Fabragas will definitely start despite what Wenger said?

I remember Henry was doubtful every year when he was in England and he always played.

As for taking a draw, no fecking way, we don't want to leave the door open for Chelsea.


Well Wenger said he was uncertain about Cesc before the Chelsea game, and he didn't play. So he might play, but there's a higher chance he won't. We can live without him though, Wenger's established a way of playing without him in the side, and we're almost as good now.

If Chelsea lose on Sunday, I'll definitely want a win out of the game - we could go well clear of them, should we win on Monday, and then by some miracle we beat them at the Emirates.
 
Grant Wilson Goal.com

Scholes has not featured for United since the 1-0 victory over Rangers in the Champions League last month and now Ferguson believes the veteran is a doubt to face the Gunners.

The former England star was expected to feature in United’s 1-1 draw against Valencia on Tuesday, but after a setback in training the United boss feels that he will not be able to call upon the influential midfielder.

"Paul tried training on Sunday and came off," Ferguson told MUTV.

"He will be doubtful for next Monday."
__

SCHOLES DOUBT FOR ARSENAL CLASH By Simon Stone, Press Association Sport Chief Football Writer Sporting Life


mmm.. for instance :lol:

Personally the 11 on the pitch matter so it's down to them and not people that wont be there

Scholes will be there but I'd be surprised to see Fabregas gotta be 50/50 with him

doubtful

adjective: dubious, uncertain, questionable, suspicious, shady, equivocal, precarious, suspect, fishy

Feeling uncertain about something
Not known with certainty
the fire was of doubtful origin
Improbable

You will above that nowhere above does the word 'doubtful' mean that it is impossible, so SAF never said that Scholes would not play, but that there is a chance that he might not play.

Brush up on your language comprehension skills!
 
Van Der Sar
Rafael
Evra
Rio
Vidic
Carrick
Anderson
Park
Nani
Rooney
Berbatov

Yes 4-4-2. Reckon SAF will stick with the Berba-Rooney pairing upfront. Anderson is coming into form, Carrick complements him well and his positioning will be critical towards checking opposition runs from midfield (a key feature of Arsenal's playing style). Park always seem to play well against Arsenal and he can tuck in when needed, offering us greater tactical flexibility.

Their back five is their soft underbelly and susceptible to high tempo attacking pressure. I would go for a more direct style with Berbatov leading a high line and Rooney having free rein to drop off and link up with Nani, Park and Anderson.

I'm thinking our front four will be Park Rooney Berbatov Nani (as part of a 442) on the grounds that if it goes pear shaped and we need to go to a 433 we can stick Rooney on the left and Park down the middle.

For some reason I think we're gunna play that 442 ish system with Rooney and Berbatov up front and Park from the left but really playing quite centrally.

Same thought
Question is who will pair up in centre midfield
Reckon it would be Carrick and Anderson
 
But on the other side of that, we have the best away record in the league, and there must be a reason for that. This game will be determined by how well Arsenal defend, and how well you retain the ball in midfield. If we dominate possession, which we normally do, whilst not making any feck ups like last year, we will almost certainly get something from the game. I don't think it's a case of "United will probably win" - it's been pretty close the last few years, and you were somewhat fortunate to win last year.

True, however the only time you have played a top team away from Home, you lost.

United are unbeaten in the last 5 meetings, winning 4.

I wouldn't call that close at all.
 
Same thought
Question is who will pair up in centre midfield
Reckon it would be Carrick and Anderson
That was my first thought as well, but then I started thinking about how Fletch generally dominates the Arsenal midfield. I just hope Fergie doesn't go with a Fletch-Ando combination as the attacking midfielders in the Arsenal line-up will find themselves with quite a bit of space at times. Carrick really needs to play with one, or both, of them.
 
True, however the only time you have played a top team away from Home, you lost.

United are unbeaten in the last 5 meetings, winning 4.

I wouldn't call that close at all.


What I meant by saying it was close was that the results have been close. IE - we haven't lost 3-0 or something at Old Trafford - they've been by the odd goal, mainly. Our performances away from the Emirates against you are actually better than they are at home. We've played well against you, and it's about time we converted it into meaningful points.

And yes, the last top team we played away from home we lost, but you might count Man City as a top team now, and we did win that one.
 
And yes, the last top team we played away from home we lost, but you might count Man City as a top team now, and we did win that one.

You're 'avin a larf aintcha?
You may count them as a top team but they've won nothing yet. Until they actually take a major trophy back to the council house, they'll remain a bunch of rich no-marks.
 
You're 'avin a larf aintcha?
You may count them as a top team but they've won nothing yet. Until they actually take a major trophy back to the council house, they'll remain a bunch of rich no-marks.

Well I think Bryan Munich was referring to a top four side, and regardless of what you win, I still think City could be in that bracket. But obviously, it's neither here nor there - our record against the top clubs hasn't been good enough recently, and it's time that changed.
 
I still do not understand how Arsenal have managed to occupy the first spot. They are - for a big four team - basically crap.

Bit harsh mate. They're obviously not "crap". They just don't have the steel in defence and hopefully United will walk through it on Monday.

They'll be goals in this match, that's for sure.
 
Well I think Bryan Munich was referring to a top four side, and regardless of what you win, I still think City could be in that bracket. But obviously, it's neither here nor there - our record against the top clubs hasn't been good enough recently, and it's time that changed.

I don't understand this obsession with a top 4 in the Premier League. The last half a decade has shown the PL has a big 2 - United & Chelsea.
 
Well Wenger said he was uncertain about Cesc before the Chelsea game, and he didn't play. So he might play, but there's a higher chance he won't. We can live without him though, Wenger's established a way of playing without him in the side, and we're almost as good now.

If Chelsea lose on Sunday, I'll definitely want a win out of the game - we could go well clear of them, should we win on Monday, and then by some miracle we beat them at the Emirates.

I don't care what he says before your games against Chelsea, I just remember Henry being doubtful every single season before United v Arsenal.

Wasn't Henry on the bench in 2006/07, Cal?

I honestly can't remember, but the fact remains that Wenger always used to say he's doubtful and he was always fit to play. Now, it's Fabregas.
 
KO is at 20.00 not 19.45 previously stated in opening post.
 
I don't understand this obsession with a top 4 in the Premier League. The last half a decade has shown the PL has a big 2 - United & Chelsea.

Yes, but there was a gap between the top 4 and everyone else. Now, you can argue there were two tiers of the top four, but it's not to say that the top 4 weren't ahead of the rest.

And who cares about Henry's supposed injuries before United games? The bitterness is ridiculous.
 
Anyone feel our 15 game unbeaten thing might get broken on Monday?
 
Less than twenty percent for me. Wenger won't play him unless he's actually fit to play. He won't risk losing him for multiple games for the sake of Monday.
 
Anyone feel our 15 game unbeaten thing might get broken on Monday?

555gg.gif