Mass shooting at Gay night club in Orlando

Of course guns have something to do with it, the entire debate however being shifted onto gun control which clearly wouldn't have impacted what happened today seeing as the guy was armed to the teeth with explosives is wrong. You simply don't want to admit that since you ran in here ranting about white males and gun control from the off before any details had emerged.
My first post in this thread was about there being given a bomb involved and I've only mentioned once a suspicion that the shooter would probably be white, so what the feck are you on about?
 
Because it is a bullshit straw man argument?
A bullshit straw man would be misrepresenting someone's point completely to try and attack the argument you wish they were making. It looks something like this:

He killed 20 people with guns so suicide bombs clearly need to be controlled. Nice logic.

Not.
 
The sad thing is that it is probably too late for America. I have a strong feeling that if the government decided to ban guns and police tried to confiscate them, there would be a blood bath, as many Americans see their right to a gun as higher than another human's right to life.
 
Someone murders 20 people with a gun and it has nothing to do with guns? Kinell.

People like you are part of the problem. You should hang your head in shame.
 
Aye, go and bury your head in the sand and pat yourself on the back for refusing to inform yourself about Islamic ideology. How very tolerant of you.


Police have confirmed they let off a controlled explosion, he most certainly did have explosives.
I've seen nothing official to say there was a controlled explosion.

I have seen some reports saying he had a 'device'. Not 'armed to the teeth' with explosives, as you have mentioned. What he was armed with is was an assault rifle and handgun.
 
I've seen nothing official to say there was a controlled explosion.

I have seen some reports saying he had a 'device'. Not 'armed to the teeth' with explosives, as you have mentioned. What he was armed with is was an assault rifle and handgun.
Sky news have quotes from the police saying they carried out a controlled explosion. CNN have quotes saying he had an explosive device strapped to himself.

Someone murders 20 people with a gun and it has nothing to do with guns? Kinell.

People like you are part of the problem. You should hang your head in shame.
Yes, continue to simplify. You are only interested in this because you have a gun control dog in it, and clearly have no intention of opening your eyes to anything about the perpetrator.
 
You are right. I'd have been quite happy if he had killed 20 people with a large halibut.

But he didn't. Guns killed 20 people. So strangely enough it seems reasonable to involve guns in the discussion.
 
I disagree with DJ Jeff on the significance of gun laws in incidents like this, but I think he is right to point out the hypocrisy of the media when it comes to focusing on the issue of guns and not the other important underlying issue that will become apparent in this case. 20 people (most of whom will be gay) are now dead because of some backward religion that condones violence against gays in very clear and explicit terms and yet it is impossible to imagine the media attacking the Islamic religion in the same way it will attack gun culture.
 
The irony is the gun nuts should know better than anyone how hard it is to hit a moving target with a handgun at any sort of distance.

But they'll still use this to babble on about the 2nd amendment... Sad.
 
:lol: Your capacity to attack arguments you wish people were making is superb.

No. I'm attacking the argument you are making. You are saying that mass gun murder is nothing to do with guns as the murderer may have had other tools of mass murder if the guns had failed. The guns didn't fail and he may not have had other methods anyway. Either way you are making bullshit arguments that disrespect the dead.
 
I disagree with DJ Jeff on the significance of gun laws in incidents like this, but I think he is right to point out the hypocrisy of the media when it comes to focusing on the issue of guns and not the other important underlying issue that will become apparent in this case. 20 people (most of whom will be gay) are now dead because of some backward religion that condones violence against gays in very clear and explicit terms and yet it is impossible to imagine the media attacking the Islamic religion in the same way it will attack gun culture.

I suspect when it's all confirmed that the shooter was a Muslim, you'll see less of "gun nut" & "psychopath" and more "terrorist" and his religion will be more of a focus. Let's be honest the religion of Dylann Roof's was never touched upon, this chap if he is Muslim will be mentioned frequently.
 
I suspect when it's all confirmed that the shooter was a Muslim, you'll see less of "gun nut" & "psychopath" and more "terrorist" and his religion will be more of a focus. Let's be honest the religion of Dylann Roof's was never touched upon, this chap if he is Muslim will be mentioned frequently.
Because Roof's was a hate crime with the explicit intention of sparking a race war, whereas the perp here is aligned with radical Islam which is some of the most homophobic stuff you could lower yourself to reading.
 
I suspect when it's all confirmed that the shooter was a Muslim, you'll see less of "gun nut" & "psychopath" and more "terrorist" and his religion will be more of a focus. Let's be honest the religion of Dylann Roof's was never touched upon, this chap if he is Muslim will be mentioned frequently.

If this is the case only in the US could such an attack occur so easily. You can't easily legislate against insanity but you can legislate against guns. A loon with nail clippers is far better prospect than a loon with automatic weapons.
 
Because Roof's was a hate crime with the explicit intention of sparking a race war, whereas the perp here is aligned with radical Islam which is some of the most homophobic stuff you could lower yourself to reading.

Obviously Christianity has never been used to promote racism or homophobia ever. I'm not saying his faith was relevant in any case, just stating when it is confirmed that this person is Muslim, there will be much focus placed on his religion unlike any other situation.
 
Obviously Christianity has never been used to promote racism or homophobia ever. I'm not saying his faith was relevant in any case, just stating when it is confirmed that this person is Muslim, there will be much focus placed on his religion unlike any other situation.
His parents were from Afghanistan...
 
The gunman has been named. Omar Sadiqi Marten

Donald Trump is waiting to pounce.
 
I suspect when it's all confirmed that the shooter was a Muslim, you'll see less of "gun nut" & "psychopath" and more "terrorist" and his religion will be more of a focus. Let's be honest the religion of Dylann Roof's was never touched upon, this chap if he is Muslim will be mentioned frequently.

But how much focus will be placed on the actual religion of Islam and what it teaches about homosexuality and violence? We'll hear talk of 'extremism' and 'hate', but who will have the guts to be honest about Islam and apply to it the same standard of objection that we apply to any other political ideology that advocates violence against gay people?
 
Obviously Christianity has never been used to promote racism or homophobia ever. I'm not saying his faith was relevant in any case, just stating when it is confirmed that this person is Muslim, there will be much focus placed on his religion unlike any other situation.
Yeah, but it doesn't apply in the Roof case, his was about race and not religion. This case seems quite undoubtedly to be religiously motivated hence people will focus on that.
 
But how much focus will be placed on the actual religion of Islam and what it teaches about homosexuality and violence? We'll hear talk of 'extremism' and 'hate', but who will have the guts to be honest about Islam and apply to it the same standard of objection that we apply to any other political ideology that advocates violence against gay people?
The sad answer is no one. People have manipulated "Islam" to be an untouchable race in the media, and not a perfectly questionable ideology like any other that people willingly align themselves with.
 
Yeah, but it doesn't apply in the Roof case, his was about race and not religion. This case seems quite undoubtedly to be religiously motivated hence people will focus on that.

Well this was about homophobia which no doubt has been a part of Islam. And likewise in Roof's case, Christianity has been used as a tool of racism.
 
I really struggle to comprehend that sort of logic.


Simple. You play enough X-Box you will think you can shoot as well as Navy Seal snipers.

You have an extensive training program that prepares soldiers to be ready for combat and yet blue-on-blue situations happen with some level of regularity. Normal civilians think they can shoot their way out of trouble? Movies meet false reality.
 
Over 50 dead and counting. Local authorities say death toll now 53.
 
Christ, over 50. Just awful.

I know someone who moved to Florida last year and when I saw him at Christmas he said he could not believe how easy it was to get guns there.

Something must surely be done, this is now the biggest gun massacre in the US since the 19th century.
 
And just one shooter, that confirmed? 50 dead and 50+ more injured? Woah...
Saturday night in a crowded club, I can see why. It's not like the schools/colleges where the gunman had to go from class to class. Seems like he just walked in and open fired on the crowd, similar to the Bataclan. Shocking stuff.
 
But how much focus will be placed on the actual religion of Islam and what it teaches about homosexuality and violence? We'll hear talk of 'extremism' and 'hate', but who will have the guts to be honest about Islam and apply to it the same standard of objection that we apply to any other political ideology that advocates violence against gay people?

Honestly I'm not sure. I think there has definitely been more focused place on Islam than before, you obviously don't think enough has been. I suspect the reason why is most still don't know enough about the religion in the mainstream media and the representations you see are distorted from both sides.
 
What you were saying is idiotic.

Upon sensing danger, fight or flee response kicked in. If everyone have guns, many will scatter, but just as many will draw their weapon and starts shooting. Enclosed space, panic, cig smoke, alcohol. Yeah, no chance at all the crossfire won't kill/injure many and cause absolute pandemonium.
Don't they have a smoking ban in Florida?
 
What the hell kind of weapon did he get ahold of? A full auto attack rifle?

I can understand people being allowed to buy shotguns and hunting rifles, but fecking tools of war?
 
That won't matter in the court of public opinion. I'm not arguing you're incorrect necessarily.

Yeah but the court of public opinion is stupid, instantly jumping to conclusions formed on biases and incomplete information and the whims of others. Nothing to see here.