The Hilton
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,298
I said the Crystal Palace match as it was a perfect and recent example of saves he could or should have made. There’s been countless goals all season where fans have thought he could or should have done better with weak goals. Yet somehow you’ve got this stat saying he saved basically 6 more than he should have, after I’ve just watched a video of his best saves of the season and they were 99% bread and butter saves for any keeper, there was nowhere near 6 saves that were expected to be goals but Onana somehow pulled off a worldy
You keep referring to it as "my" stat, which you know is dishonest. It's a statistic that came from the Premier League. You can go on as many hyperbole filled rants as you like, but up until the 10th April he was the second best goalkeeper in the league for preventing expected goals, having conceded 5.7 fewer goals than the expected goals from the shots on target he'd faced. The Palace game doesn't factor into that, and will no doubt reduce that number, but it's almost certainly still positive, which is an improvement compared to DDG last season who was in the red.
This is exactly why it's a great stat, because it allows us to be objective in the face of irrational fans who are frothing at the mouth due to recency bias after a bad performance. It's a much better gauge than you watching a compilation video that you weren't impressed with.