Hed Zitin
New Member
Must be the biggest bunch of overrated so called creative players ever at a club.
Yep. Nobody is saying martial or rashford are good enough to be main men yet. Martial probably is ready to start consistently, but he can't be the main man yet. I saw him and rashford in the same boat as Sterling and Sane. All very promising youngsters who have been incredibly inconsistent, though City had 3 other world class players around them to be the main players and allow them to develop as youngsters. Martial and Rashford when they play are essentially the main men. The players that get on the ball the most and we look to to create something. And that in a system that doesn't get the most out of them anyway. Obviously they're going to be inconsistent as feck. They need a lot more quality around them and that'll lift their level. Mourinho brought in a static, old but talented striker last season in Ibra who by the end wasn't quite good enough anyway and severely limited how we could play. Then replaced him with a striker who has shit all round play and hasn't been scoring regularly either, as he's incredibly reliant on service from others.All Mourinho's fault imo.
He saw how porous our attack was last season and didn't do enough. A Lukaku for Ibra swap is everything we did to fix our attack from a personnel point of view.
Not good enough.
I said in a thread a week or so ago, it's borderline criminal how negligible our squad-building has been at the front end.
When you compare the line-up of forwards/goal-threats that City have to ours, its almost like you're looking at City vs. say, Ajax. It's like night and day.
De Bruyne, Aguero, Jesus, Sane, Sterling.
Lukaku, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Martial, Rashford, Lingard. Some might say Pogba, Paul offers zero goal-threat so I won't include him.
It is frightening, absolutely frightening the difference in rosters there. Mind-blowing.
Not sure I see it tbh, Lukaku and Rashford could be score what Aguero/Jesus do, Martial play as well as Sane, and Mikhi offer as much as Sterling does, I'll give you De Bruyne, but as much as he is better than what we have in that position, Pogba is for us in midfield.
Is the issue all the players, or perhaps how they're been coached?
Pogba hasn’t proven he’s a match winner yet. Not sure why you need to point out their fees. We overpaid for them both.
Lukaku has been hit and miss. But he scores his goals in spurts and we knew that before he arrived. He relies on service though. If there’s no service then he’s not gonna be like Aguero or De Bruyne where they’d produce some individual brilliance.
Not sure I see it tbh, Lukaku and Rashford could be score what Aguero/Jesus do, Martial play as well as Sane, and Mikhi offer as much as Sterling does, I'll give you De Bruyne, but as much as he is better than what we have in that position, Pogba is for us in midfield.
Is the issue all the players, or perhaps how they're been coached?
Both for me.
Would Jose be 15pts clear at the top with this City squad? Not for me.
Would Pep have this squad top of the league? No.
I said in a thread a week or so ago, it's borderline criminal how negligible our squad-building has been at the front end.
When you compare the line-up of forwards/goal-threats that City have to ours, its almost like you're looking at City vs. say, Ajax. It's like night and day.
De Bruyne, Aguero, Jesus, Sane, Sterling.
Lukaku, Mkhitaryan, Mata, Martial, Rashford, Lingard. Some might say Pogba, Paul offers zero goal-threat so I won't include him.
It is frightening, absolutely frightening the difference in rosters there. Mind-blowing.
You're forgetting David Silva and Bernardo Silva.
Christ. Its mental, mate, isn't it.
Balls. They were all thought good enough to be signed for United and then haven’t pushed on.The only players that would get into City’s starting 11 are De Gea and Pogba.
You think the likes of City and Chelsea would have Jones, Smalling, Young and Shaw starting every week for them?Give me a break. Herrera, Mkhitaryan and Martial wouldn’t sniff the pitch for those sides. And like it or not, those two are the competition. They have better players, meanwhile we’re settling for average dross. It’s no surprise they’re so far ahead of us.
We need to wake the feck up.
Balls. They were all thought good enough to be signed for United and then haven’t pushed on.
A lot of it is because the manager we’ve got mostly deals with finished articles and hasn’t a clue how to get consistency and performances from the likes of Smalling or Jones.
Very unfair to write off half your squad. They’re all unlucky to play for United during an era of short termism and poor management.
Haven't seen that before. Wow, that's pretty damning but not unthinkable when you look at how we approach the game. You have to admit that this is very concerning. Some time ago I also read some of the comments from players during his Inter days and they said that he wasn't all that tactically compared to Italian coaches in Seria A, however, he managed to motivate them like no other. There is clearly ground for being worried and having doubts given his current state and aura is no longer there with him, how he can motivate anyone right now.Indeed.
Wasn't Hazard pretty critical of Mourinho's tactics as well? Saying he improved under Conte in a week and that he learned more about the importance of movement without the ball (which, for us is a major criticism of our players)?
http://www.espn.co.uk/football/chel...actical-preparation-better-than-jose-mourinho
We could have Messi and Ronaldo, Mourinho would still have us looking disjointed. I'm fairly certain our attackers would perform much better under other managers.
Haven't seen that before. Wow, that's pretty damning but not unthinkable when you look at how we approach the game. You have to admit that this is very concerning. Some time ago I also read some of the comments from players during his Inter days and they said that he wasn't all that tactically compared to Italian coaches in Seria A, however, he managed to motivate them like no other. There is clearly ground for being worried and having doubts given his current state and aura is no longer there with him, how he can motivate anyone right now.
Who? Rashford the academy boy? Martial the sub? Lukaku the new guy? Mikhi the new guy?Well a lot of them haven’t done much under two or three managers. None of them are real game winners. I can’t remember the last time one of our attackers won a man of the match award. That’s how bad things have gotten.
I don’t think there’s even one of our attackers that would get in the Spurs or Liverpool starting 11, City and Chelsea isn’t even debatable.
Every single one of our attckers is over rated and flatters to deceive.
Well some people think we’d bring in the Napoli coach and this lot will be scoring 100 goals plus.
Also, he had that siege mentality with his previous teams at Chelsea and Inter. I don't think it's working any longer.
He also assembled tough, warrior-like squads at both of those clubs. Here, he has absolutely nobody with any fire in the belly and the will to go the extra mile, maybe 2-3 players maximum. It's a 50/50 split for me, 50% him being past his sell-by-date at the top table of management and 50% poor characters within the squad and lacking in talent.
A theory which can't, bar some weird scenario, ever be tested. Still, hindsight is great but you are looking at players who've already played a part of our rivals' teams. You can't just say Martial is no better if he hasn't played in such circumstances. You can say i also don't know, so what give you ask? I just think that our systems the last few years suit players who are different to those who we have.People keep saying that but I don't think they would.
City - Pep doesn't like lazy players so Rashford is screwed. Martial is no better than Sterling or Sane.
Liverpool - Where would any of our attackers play? Most likely on the bench. So they wouldn't flourish there.
Spurs - Kane would start over Lukaku. Rashford or Martial don't really suit Spurs system. Lingard would probably fit best as a back up for Alli. None of them would flourish.
Chelsea - Lukaku possibly over Morata. Again, the others wouldn't suit the system so much. Rashford and Martial wouldn't work as wing backs.
So, yeah I don't think your theory is correct.
Not posted in a while.
But looking at the comparisons and comments of our lads being inept, I thought I'd give my 10 cents.
Let's break it down:
City - Mourinho failed De Bruyne (and look what he's gone on and done).
Liverpool - He failed Salah
Chelsea - As soon as he left, people like Hazard and Pedro gained form again.
He's certainly improved out defenders. However, I refuse to accept that the following attackers are worse than our rivals:
- Martial
- Rashford
- Mkhitaryan
- Lingard
- Mata
Look at Mkhitaryan under Klopp.
Look at Mata before Mourinho joined Chelsea.
I think Mourinho has a tendency to destroy the confidence of certain of attacking players.
Did he? Pretty sure Oscar played in the middle. Lampard played there when Mata was there. Mata was on the left or right for Chelsea.
Mata played centrally, Oscar and Hazard came in and both wanted to play centrally. Mourinho used Oscar because he made tackles... Mata was pushed to the right where his form dipped for Chelsea and Hazard used on the left
So where did Lampard play? He certainly didn’t play in a midfield two especially at his age and he was a regular when Mata was there.
Absolute rubbish. Smalling and Jones are never gonna get any better than they are now. They were rubbish under Ferguson too.Balls. They were all thought good enough to be signed for United and then haven’t pushed on.
A lot of it is because the manager we’ve got mostly deals with finished articles and hasn’t a clue how to get consistency and performances from the likes of Smalling or Jones.
Very unfair to write off half your squad. They’re all unlucky to play for United during an era of short termism and poor management.
Mata has been here four years and has done nothing.
167 games 39 goals 30 assists.
Lukaku wouldn’t suit a lot of those teams besides Chelsea. Even then Morata does more.
Martial is a inconsistent 21 year old. But that’s what you gonna get with a player that age.
Mkhitaryan also played like this under Klopp.
We only have signed three forwards under Mourinho. Lukaku and Ibra was just a swap. Mkhitaryan has been disappointing.
And they would all struggle at Utd. No.10's just don't work here.So can you name me a period where Mata has been consistently amazing for us? I’m not talking about 1 good game and then followed by 5 average games.
I’d take Eriksen, Coutinho and Ozil over him.
This is a terrible post. It's as over-the-top as lazy. Overreactions like this make the 'Caf hard to stomach at times.our attackers are hugely overrated by our fans
Lukaku - not world class, reminiscent of when Liverpool signed benteke. Mistakes were made. We should get rid immediately
Rashford - sorry but he’s rubbish, can run but nothing else basically he’s another Walcott.
Mkhi - lol
Mata - only player with any sort of a brain but too slow and weak.
Martial - our best attacker but barely gets played
Lingard - didn’t rate him but his performances last few weeks have changed my opinion but should never be more than squad player.