7even
Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
That line of reasoning was based on what you stated - the newer generation will always be better than the older generation
If you find it daft, that is because your assertion was on shaky ground to begin with
So use your logical sense to answer your own assertion
is Germany 2000 > West Germany 1990?
is France 2011 > France 2000?
is Portugal 2011 > Portugal 2000?
is Italy 2010 > Italy 2000?
The whole premise of the thread was the depth of top quality talent in different eras. Within the context of that era, the pitch and equipment, the medical science and fitness conditioning etc, judge the proven quality of the player's talent and his level of play on a sustained basis, is he a great player? then compare the numbers of individuals who qualify in each era.
As the above examples show, the availability of top quality talent waxes, wanes and waxes over time. Our own experience in youth development is another example. Talent is not a production line neither can football talent measured predominantly by how big, strong and quick the players are.
Good post!
But better is not the same as more talented. Every generation have their highs and lows. I never stated there is a production line.
Maybe my school English sucks and I misunderstand a lot of words, or maybe I can't explain everything correct.
But this will be my lost post in this subject. Every generation become's better and better, but that's not the same as to say a new generation produce more talent's.
Maradona is better then Messi. That's my opinion. But Barcelona is probably the best team ever. 11 against 11 in there prime.