KingEric7
Stupid Conspiracy Enthusiast Wanker
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2006
- Messages
- 24,005
These Vieira comparisons... 

1) What's him being French got to do with anything
2) A mercenary? At 18? My arse..If he moves every few years then fine.but he's hardly a vieri is he: Christian Vieri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
These Vieira comparisons...![]()
I see it two ways, and I could be wrong on both counts as I haven't followed the topic enough.
1) He's a mercenary, and we shouldn't have these types of players at the club. Players like Cleverley who've grown up at the club are far better for us.
He's not as good as you're all making out. SAF and the coaching staff see him on a daily basis, and he never plays. He came on for us against Stoke, and I must say, I was impressed, but there's a difference between doing it in the reserves or doing it at OT against a beaten Stoke, and doing it in a big game, or at least a meaningful game (WBA this Sunday for example). He wants first team football, which we can't provide. We can't provide first team football for someone who plays in midfield - the much-maligned position at United, the weak spot. We had everyone dying to sign Sneijder in the summer, or Schweinsteiger, or Gotze, and so on, yet this guy still can't get in.
I am disappointed we won't get to see one of the more promising talents we've had in recent years come through for us, but maybe it's all much ado about nothing.
He's 18, far too early to call him a mercenary specially when we're reported to have matched the wages Juve offered him and he still left. Even if thats not the case, it'd be very harsh to call him a mercenary when he's just changed 2 clubs and the move to us from a small french side made complete sense regardless of the pay hike.
He's 18, he's hardly going to be starting league games for us in the PL. Does not mean he isnt that good. There are very few special talents like Fabregas who are that good at that age.
Also, the way SAF has always talked of him, he has to be a great talent. Its obvious from when you see him play.
Lets not go down the "he wasnt that good anyways" route just because he's leaving.
Look, like I said, I could be wrong on both counts, because I don't know enough about him or the situation, I'm just offering two thoughts on the matter.
And he doesn't have to be playing first team football, no one expects him to, but he never even makes the bench. This season, at any one stage, we've been without Scholes, Anderson, Cleverley and Fletcher, Carrick and Giggs have also had their spells out, yet he's never looked like playing.
Even against Blackburn, we had our team decimated. Fergie brought Will Keane on, and Anderson to regain fitness. We had a sub to make, which could've been Pogba, and he still didn't play him. I'd like to know, if he is as good as everybody's making out, why he hasn't been given more of an opportunity.
Look, like I said, I could be wrong on both counts, because I don't know enough about him or the situation, I'm just offering two thoughts on the matter.
And he doesn't have to be playing first team football, no one expects him to, but he never even makes the bench. This season, at any one stage, we've been without Scholes, Anderson, Cleverley and Fletcher, Carrick and Giggs have also had their spells out, yet he's never looked like playing.
Even against Blackburn, we had our team decimated. Fergie brought Will Keane on, and Anderson to regain fitness. We had a sub to make, which could've been Pogba, and he still didn't play him. I'd like to know, if he is as good as everybody's making out, why he hasn't been given more of an opportunity.
Is untrue. He was constantly on the bench for us.
Thing is, he's nothing like Vieira that some think he is. He's attack minded and not really upto the mark defensively yet. Because of that, its a risk bringing him on in tight games which is why he's only ever come on when we've sealed the result. As you'd be aware, that hasnt really happened often enough which explains his lack of game time. When we've sealed up the result, he has invariably come on.
What about the blackburn game? We needed a goal and brought on a striker, why'd we bring on pogba?
As a side point, this is the kind of thing that quite a few clubs will start to face with the advent of city. the number of points required to win the league will be high which makes every game very important. This means less opportunities for the youngsters. The rise in standard if the teams is also a huge factor in this, obviously.
He has been named on the bench more than I'd realised, but even so it's about ten games throughout the whole season.
I think we can ignore the first two months of the season, as he'd only just been promoted to the reserves; expecting him to feature at that point is unrealistic. But even when he has been named he doesn't feature, you say that's because games have been tight, but some of these games have been the likes of Liverpool and Chelsea, you can't expect them to be anything other than tight, whereas games against the likes of Norwich at home, Fulham away, Wolves at home, where you'd expect things to be more comfortable (as they were), he wasn't even named.
When did SAF ever expect to play him? He's either been named in games where he wasn't likely to play, because the game was going to be tight, and you can't afford to bring on inexperienced players, or not named in games where you'd expect him to play.
And regarding the Blackburn game, as you've said, he's an attacking midfielder, he would've been another attacking option when we were a goal down to the league's worst side, it couldn't have gone any worse if he'd have come on, so why not throw him on?
I agree with the Vieira bit though, from what I've seen, the comparison ends at stature and skin colour, his game is nothing like Vieira's.
See, the thing is, he isnt really ready for the 1st team yet. Its been evident from the limited chances he's got. He's 18 though and has a lot of time on his side. Not having appearances at this stage isnt really a slight on him and doesnt mean he isnt very good. He has been given the odd minute to give him a feel of things and to give him exposure not because he's ready for the team. That'l come with time.
Him and Morrison were the best we had. There's no doubt about that and its poor form to suddenly question his talent just because he's leaving imo.
Regarding the blackburn game, we needed goals so we brought on a striker. MAde sense. I dont see why you'd consider pogba a better bet to come on.
Theres life after Pogba
Magazine: Forget Pogba! These Man United teens are the REAL future at Old Trafford | Radio talkSPORT
Tunnicliffe, Barkley, Witsel, M'Vila, Martinez, Alex Song are all good options
It will cost us but at least if we buy another world class midfielder over the summer then we will have a player that will step in right away to help us challenge for the CL again instead of waiting 2 or 3 years for Pogba to develop and sacraficing the CL for another couple of seasons like we have done in the past when waiting for talents like Neville, Ronaldo to develop etc
If we get to the CL final next year, Pogba will be long forgotten
1) I mean that he has no reason to believe Manchester United is the alpha and omega of football.
2) He's changed clubs 4 times in 4 years. He's either a restless spirit, or follows the scent of money wherever it leads him.
Your talking about his youth career? Then a french kid at 16 leaves to join manchester United. Juventus are a big club. I think it's a bit too early and easy to say he's a mercenary.
That's an interesting article. Can anyone shed more light on Tunnicliffe, especially since that article compares his style to Gerrard/Keane.
where are these twenty brazilian kids that were at Old Trafford stands ?
Of wich Steve Mclaren has returned to and got them to second one point behind the leaders.Don't they go to FC Twente first to increase their chances of getting a passport? More about it here: Manchester United's new recruits from Brazil | Mail Online
The players mentioned there are all still fairly young and if any are to come to us it probably won't be for a few more years yet.
That's an interesting article. Can anyone shed more light on Tunnicliffe, especially since that article compares his style to Gerrard/Keane.
where are these twenty brazilian kids that were at Old Trafford stands ?
Think more along the lines of Lee Cattermole. He's no Gerrard or Keane.
Tunicliffe is in the same mould as Neville and O'Shea though. Not immensly talented, but a attitude and determination who'll allow him to have a shot of becoming a good player. He is one of the youngest (if not the youngest player) out on a loan right now, which means that we have faith in his ability. He's a fighter with a good pass in him, and decent technique. He'll still learning and developing, so I can see him have a good career as a rotation option for us in the future.
The next Fletcher perhaps?Think more along the lines of Lee Cattermole. He's no Gerrard or Keane.
The next Fletcher perhaps?
No disrespect meant to Fletcher. I was just meaning in terms of the role in the squad Fletcher now plays for us. Fletcher was robbed of a lot by injury. As a youngster he was easily technically better than he currently displays.Harsh on Fletcher, his technique was far superior at a similar age....
Tunicliffe is in the same mould as Neville and O'Shea though. Not immensly talented, but a attitude and determination who'll allow him to have a shot of becoming a good player. He is one of the youngest (if not the youngest player) out on a loan right now, which means that we have faith in his ability. He's a fighter with a good pass in him, and decent technique. He'll still learning and developing, so I can see him have a good career as a rotation option for us in the future.
The next Fletcher perhaps?
Cool. Such a player would be very useful to us long term.more a Nicky Butt
Cool. Such a player would be very useful to us long term.
more a Nicky Butt