Class of 63
Sourness
The Guardian YTS counter obviously had something better to do on the night so it's defaulted to 50:50.
It was a 68:32 match if ever I saw one.
The Guardian YTS counter obviously had something better to do on the night so it's defaulted to 50:50.
It was a 68:32 match if ever I saw one.
I spent far too long during the game trying to work it out... And I came to the conclusion that he had to be seeing how likely Migs was to saving it
I think if he figured that he'd probably save it he'd have given a yellow
The Guardian YTS counter obviously had something better to do on the night so it's defaulted to 50:50.
It was a 68:32 match if ever I saw one.
Coronavirus infected counter.
FotMob has it down as 66.8% to 33.2%. As far as I know, they use Opta stats.
I spent far too long during the game trying to work it out... And I came to the conclusion that he had to be seeing how likely Migs was to saving it
I think if he figured that he'd probably save it he'd have given a yellow
Chill dude.Oh yeah let's make a joke about a virus that's killed 1000's of people worldwide, bravo.
Chill dude.
I have been living with the epidemic for a good 2 1/2 months now.
We are. I think we will be even better at that next season.Obviously not talking about injuries , but are we much fitter this season? We seem much fitter this season
March a year ago we were dead on our feet from 60 min onwards, yesterday we seemed full of energy from start to finish
even if the keeper was going to save that shot, it's still a red card isn't it?
can't understand why the ref took forever on that
This is wrong. While I'm not a fan of the "eye test", there's little debte that Brugge had the ball very little yesterday.
BBC reports.. and other stat pages put the possession metric to 66-67% v 33 - 34%
28 Shot attempts 10 Shots on goal
Second half in particular, even though the foot came off a bit, it was just a one way street. Romero probably had time to walk out the stadium to grab a hotdog at times
Yes, I think he may have played for a rivalPretty sure I have seen their Goal Keeper in the Premier League, I have seen him walk besides Brendan
Having more of the ball will do that for you.Obviously not talking about injuries , but are we much fitter this season? We seem much fitter this season
March a year ago we were dead on our feet from 60 min onwards, yesterday we seemed full of energy from start to finish
There’s usually the it’s only Brugge rubbish or if that defender doesn’t get sent off we get beat.
Saveable or not it's still a clear goalscoring opportunity.
The only reason he stayed so long was to make it look like he was thinking about overturning his on field decision, which was never going to happen.
The ref likely regarded the decision to have him view it again as ridiculous as we did.
I am guessing that he was looking at whether the shot was on target. Even if GK could save it, that’s still considered as denying goal scoring chance I would think. But if the shot was off target then it wouldn’t be.
It’s interesting though. A ref can never predict stuff like whether a keeper will save a shot even if it’s going straight down his throat. That is why I feel shot on target would be a more objective way to determine as “opportunity” to score. Takes the subjectivity or goalkeeper’s ability out if it.I'd love to hear a ref's take on it, because I can't see him a) taking so long to just "appear to be thinking" or b) seeing if it was going off target (it obviously isn't).
This is the law:
SENDING-OFF OFFENCES
A player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offences is sent off:
- denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence (except a goalkeeper within their penalty area)
In my mind, the goalscoring opportunity is the actual strike itself... which has been taken so the handball isn't denying that. So the red card comes down to whether or not it's denying a goal. And as there wasn't an conclusive evidence that Migs would save it, then it has to be a red.
If the shot was going straight down Migs throat, or there was a player stood directly in line with where the ball was going, then I think it would become a yellow card.
I'm no ref though, so who knows.
I'd love to hear a ref's take on it, because I can't see him a) taking so long to just "appear to be thinking" or b) seeing if it was going off target (it obviously isn't).
This is the law:
SENDING-OFF OFFENCES
A player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offences is sent off:
- denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence (except a goalkeeper within their penalty area)
In my mind, the goalscoring opportunity is the actual strike itself... which has been taken so the handball isn't denying that. So the red card comes down to whether or not it's denying a goal. And as there wasn't an conclusive evidence that Migs would save it, then it has to be a red.
If the shot was going straight down Migs throat, or there was a player stood directly in line with where the ball was going, then I think it would become a yellow card.
I'm no ref though, so who knows.
I'd be interested to know why one or two people voted Chong as MOTM. I think for the most part it was the same as always for him where he got a fair bit of the ball and had a go but everything he tried didn't come off. To his credit he stuck at it and got himself an assist at the end, but there's no universe in which he was our best player.
They're probably taking the piss.
Serdar Gozubuyuk