- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 38,565
- Supports
- Arsenal
Lukaku probably kills the game off. 4-2.
Everton simply have to sell Lukaku. You can't carry around an asset that can get you about 60-70m when that money can be applied to buying 2-3 top players.
Spurs and Liverpool would have been better off if their assets had wanted to stay. I have a feeling Everton will miss Lukaku if/when he leaves.Everton simply have to sell Lukaku. You can't carry around an asset that can get you about 60-70m when that money can be applied to buying 2-3 top players.
They pushed back a 70 million bid for him from Chelsea last summer, he's going to cost world-record/near world-record fee this summer.
Everton simply have to sell Lukaku. You can't carry around an asset that can get you about 60-70m when that money can be applied to buying 2-3 top players.
Think Chelsea will come back in, especially if Costa is off.They pushed back a 70 million bid for him from Chelsea last summer, he's going to cost world-record/near world-record fee this summer.
They pushed back a 70 million bid for him from Chelsea last summer, he's going to cost world-record/near world-record fee this summer.
Spurs and Liverpool would have been better off if their assets had wanted to stay. I have a feeling Everton will miss Lukaku if/when he leaves.
The McManaman-ish hair doesn't probably help either, but Davies looks so funny with seemingly no shin pads and socks in training mode.
Lukaku top scorer?
Yeah true. He had some good buys at Southampton. I don't think it's easy to replace a goal scorer who is as consistent as Lukaku has been though.I just don't think mid table clubs can carry players who are worth that much when selling the player can vastly improve them at various positions. Koeman seems to have a decent knack of getting his clubs to punch above their weight, so he could probably do a hell of a lot with 80m.
He looks like a throwback from the 70's. Wouldn't be surprised if he's got an Osmonds tattoo somewhere on his body.
He could easily score 30 goals this season.Easily. Lukaku 23, Kane 19, Sanchez 18, Zlatan & Costa 17.
Yeah true. He had some good buys at Southampton. I don't think it's easy to replace a goal scorer who is as consistent as Lukaku has been though.
I do think they'll sell him in the summer.
I think they'll focus on replacing Lukaku's goals. I'm not sure it'll matter much what kind of striker the replacement is.I'm curious whom will they get as a replacement for him. Will they go for the exact same type of a rugged, big anchor striker or for some pacey little fella.
Everton simply have to sell Lukaku. You can't carry around an asset that can get you about 60-70m when that money can be applied to buying 2-3 top players.
Haven't us(ronaldo), spurs(bale) and Liverpool(suarez) proven that it's always better to keep a world class player, who the side wouldnt normally get than to cash it in for three/four players. Although it's debatable if lukaku is that important to Everton.
Haven't us(ronaldo), spurs(bale) and Liverpool(suarez) proven that it's always better to keep a world class player, who the side wouldnt normally get than to cash it in for three/four players. Although it's debatable if lukaku is that important to Everton.
So first defeat for Shakespeare.
I think they'll focus on replacing Lukaku's goals. I'm not sure it'll matter much what kind of striker the replacement is.
And yet I still did.Thought that was obvious, did not need mentioning.
Well you do support Liverpool so…And yet I still did.![]()
'Special needs'?! Sort your life out.
Grow up? Coming from the person who needs to use the phrase 'special needs', I find that it's usually 12 year olds who find this funny.Such a sensitive soul, grow up.
Everton simply have to sell Lukaku. You can't carry around an asset that can get you about 60-70m when that money can be applied to buying 2-3 top players.
Difference is we are bigger clubs than Everton. They need the revenue to move up in the table. Carrying semi-WC player worth 80m won't take them where they want to be. They need to sell Lukaku for as much as they can get, then go out and buy another Lukaku potential player for 20-30m, along with a top midfielder and winger.
I think you could argue that those three were actually underpriced relative to how good/vital they are/were at the time. Lukaku very obviously isn't as good, and is probably appropriately valued at the rumoured price that's been floating around.
If Chelsea buy Lukaku for £75m, couldn't Everton then offer Crystal Palace £35m for Benteke and improve the squad elsewhere with the remainder? I'd argue yes.