ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,703
Just keep digging Phil, its great entertainment.You got it wrong, read again and think better about your answer.
You never did answer, where are you from?
Just keep digging Phil, its great entertainment.You got it wrong, read again and think better about your answer.
Just keep digging Phil, its great entertainment.
You never did answer, where are you from?
England should walk away from FIFA and have its own tournament with anyone willing to join. Which is probably pretty much nobody - good news, as it gives us a decent chance of winning it.
England should walk away from FIFA and have its own tournament with anyone willing to join. Which is probably pretty much nobody - good news, as it gives us a decent chance of winning it.
How are the sponsors feeling, knowing what's going on it Qatar?
How are the big clubs feeling (internally) about this winter tournament?
What about the other nations that have been rebuffed?
As others have said, all it takes is for the major nations to leave FIFA and the rest will follow. The only ones staying will be those who benefit from the corruption
Well on the basis of your entire argument about 'British Media' geographical location has everything to do with it. Surely I would be able to make a sweeping statement about you based on where you live as much as you have about 'British State' and the 'British 'Media'? That sir, is hypocrisy."It's being directed overwhelmingly against FIFA, actually. Qatar's corruption and atrocious human rights record has hardly been mentioned at all, probably partly because they're an ally and it would ask unwanted questions. 'Subtle racism', my ballsack."
Hypocrisy at its best, as you say, people dying is something pretty serious, but the English delegation being unable to criticize Qatar for it, just because they are allies and yet attacking FIFA for giving them the WC after the same delegation was crazy to get into FIFA's club with a 2018 world cup bid and subsequent histery of the british media is another great chapter of corporate british indecency and general lack of shame that has repeated a lot of times in history.
Where I am from doesn't change this fact at all.
I did not surprise me at all. Those states have done much more worse than spying other people, we are talking about the two leading terrorist states.
Made me chuckle
Last night Channel 4 News did a good piece about Boris Johnson and possible corruption in the way a contract was awarded to a Chinese developer called ABP.
Bloody hypocrites.
It is a England cause because England keeps reminding everybody how perfect they are and how better it would be for them to be in isolation. Its hard to find allies when you have already blamed everyone as a crook whose busy trying to find ways how to put their hands into their pockets.
You see, England is not as hated as many British people think it is. Countries such as Malta are pretty anglophile, the Spanish do like the English a lot and the Italians look up at the English model. All these countries would prefer England to have a dominant role in Europe rather then Germany (historical ties and arrogance). Its just that England don't want that role or at least it doesn't work to have that role.
Why would any country suffer a backlash with the most powerful football organization in the world to support a nation who constantly blame everything on them?
I think in England we have a bit of a victim complex
And yet we are now in a position where every English fan has pretty much resigned themselves to the fact that it's been 50 years since we hosted, and it'll be at least another 20 before we do again.
Then add in that we are probably the most ready-made World Cup hosts in terms of infrastructure.
To be fair, out of the repeated wc hosts (Italy, France, Brazil, Mexico) the earliest to repeat took 54 years in Brazil, without counting Mexico, chosen as a 'emergency' substitute for Colombia. Italy took 56 years and France 60. So the time gap is completely normal counting from 1966.
What about Germany... 32 years? Also the war stretches out the periods for France and Italy. It's more relevant to count the gaps as 13 and 12 world cups respectively.
However you look at these numbers, we are due a world cup by now, but clearly we're not going to get one within another 20 years or so.
Prince Phillip?I reckon he's a Saudi prince.
* Argentina’s late Fifa vice-president Julio Grondona, who denied voting for Qatar in return for $78.4m plus the proceeds of a Brazil v Argentina friendly in Doha on the eve of the vote to ease his FA’s debt crisis. “Enough with all this. The belittling of my good name must end.”
* Cyprus executive Marios Lefkaritis, who entered into a £27m oil and land deal with Qatari interests, denied wrongdoing, and voted Qatar.
And many more. Listed here: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/15/said-and-done-fifa-report-special
Some of the bribery and corruption seems so open and blatant, that it's a wonder more action isn't being taken. It seems like FIFA needs one hell of a clear out to stand any chance of permanently fixing the attitudes in the organisation. Simply replacing Blatter won't solve all the problems.Fifa’s ‘Robust’ Process, and the Men who Made it Happen:
Some of the bribery and corruption seems so open and blatant, that it's a wonder more action isn't being taken. It seems like FIFA needs one hell of a clear out to stand any chance of permanently fixing the attitudes in the organisation. Simply replacing Blatter won't solve all the problems.
What about Germany... 32 years? Also the war stretches out the periods for France and Italy. It's more relevant to count the gaps as 13 and 12 world cups respectively.
However you look at these numbers, we are due a world cup by now, but clearly we're not going to get one within another 20 years or so.
Also, if England had a wc in 1966 adding 54-60 years would put you in 2020-2026 territory, which is definitely not now (2014) and would fall in line with the next available wc.
That is not true. Both WCs were held in the Federal Republic of Germany, it just gained some territory in the meantime.I didn't count Germany since they were a different country back then, iirc the first one was before the reunification.
Also, if England had a wc in 1966 adding 54-60 years would put you in 2020-2026 territory, which is definitely not now (2014) and would fall in line with the next available wc. But I'm of the opinion that nobody is due a worldcup and if any country was that would be the ones that have never hosted one, plenty of those left.
Whats stopping world football from breaking away from fifa? the whole things an enormous sham, but i dont understand from a legal perspective why they have been given a monopoly in running the game? who fecking decided it? how long is the contract for? in the NBA there's a collective bargaining agreement that runs for a certain amount of time.
That is not true. Both WCs were held in the Federal Republic of Germany, it just gained some territory in the meantime.