RAWK goes into Meltdown 2010/2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
Smashed is like that bloke who turns up at the end of the party and asks where the beers are.
 
Ronaldo never did it in the Premier League, or any league in England for that matter. Stick him up front in Stoke on a wet, windy and freezing night with Huth on him and Delap dropping deep and he wouldn't have been half as effective. Great striker my arse. Not fit to wipe Fowler's deadly boots.

You could say they same for fowler never having done it in europe or a world cup
 
In terms of how the world views him, Fowler paid a (fair) price for a variety of things. The biggest thing is his talents in the years he was at the top of his game weren't showcased at the most important places - The Champions League and the International stage, where first England had Shearer and Sheringham and them Owen overtook him. The Premier League was growing, but wasn't the moster it is today.

And when the PL started to be that big, Fowler himself was not anymore. Even in his latter years at Liverpool and later at Leeds and City you could see his strikers instinct, but between injuries he was no longer the same player and wasn't doing enough to make the world stand and take notice.

Yeah, a good league striker. Italy had them, Spain had them. Popular with their clubs, appreciated in the country for their abilities, but as far as people outside of England are concerned, that's that.
 
What those stats don't tell you is that Fowler scored 25 league goals in season 94/95, & 28 League goals in 95/96. In his first 3 full seasons he averaged 24 Premiership goals a season.

Fowler scored a total of 120 goals in 236 appearances during his first spell at the club. Compared to Solskajaer's 91 in 235 games for a superior side.

If Robbie Fowler had been born a Mancunian, & scored the goals he did, for United. Then I dare say the opinions on here would have been ever so slightly different.

They don't tell you that because they were taken from a post/argument in which the two players were being compared over the same seasons while playing for their respective clubs.

You cannot know whether Ole may have scored more or less goals had he been in England during those earlier three seasons that you are referring to.

I am not, nor have I ever claimed that Ole is superior to Fowler, I was just making the point that he compares very favourably to Fowler over the same time period. i.e. Fowler doesn't "shit all over Solskjaer" as was the argument at the time.

You also go on about the strength of the United side, but that is using hindsight because we ended up being successful. The season Ole joined us, we had lost Hughes, Kanchelkis and Ince and were being written off as also rans in comparison to your spice boys side who were well up there in the title race between 1996-2002. This is further supported by the fact that you won a few pots in this period including the plastic treble of which you were all keen to gloat about being the dawn of a new era of dominance for Liverpool at the time. "ten reasons Liverpool will win the league this season" & "how the mighty have fallen" threads in the classics being splendid examples of this.
 
They don't tell you that because they were taken from a post/argument in which the two players were being compared over the same seasons while playing for their respective clubs.

You cannot know whether Ole may have scored more or less goals had he been in England during those earlier three seasons that you are referring to.

I am not, nor have I ever claimed that Ole is superior to Fowler, I was just making the point that he compares very favourably to Fowler over the same time period. i.e. Fowler doesn't "shit all over Solskjaer" as was the argument at the time.

You also go on about the strength of the United side, but that is using hindsight because we ended up being successful. The season Ole joined us, we had lost Hughes, Kanchelkis and Ince and were being written off as also rans in comparison to your spice boys side who were well up there in the title race between 1996-2002. This is further supported by the fact that you won a few pots in this period including the plastic treble of which you were all keen to gloat about being the dawn of a new era of dominance for Liverpool at the time. "ten reasons Liverpool will win the league this season" & "how the mighty have fallen" threads in the classics being splendid examples of this.

Not quite true. Solskjaer joined a double winning team in 1996.
 
Helped out by those 4 in 10 minutes against Forrest.

That's interesting, because I had an article that said that based on minutes played, OGS was the league's leading goalscorer in 98/99,
 
How many of those Ole goals were when he came on as a sub? I'm sure he was a sub more than Fouler.

Interesting stats.

I guess Solskjaers minutes/goals ratio would probably have been much better than Fowlers too.

Yes, this was my point. Ole's record of goals per match is slightly better than Fowler but his goals per minute I would suspect would be significantly better.
 
Yep. Nail on head. Fowler was just your run-of-the-mill 'good league striker'.

ten-a-penny. :)

I'm very much talking about how the world views him, people outside of England or those who are not very much into English football. The many who based their views on International football or Champions League football - there wasn't the same huge interest in English football in the mid-ninties - just didn't see him do the business on those stages. Not his fault, but that's the way it is.

When he was great, he really was great. Not that many people globally will see it that way. Juan Antonio Pizzo was top scorer in Spain for one season in the mid 90s, around the same period Italy had some quality league strikers who've done most of their damage in the Serie A (Chiesa, Signori, Protti). People will probably see him the same way.
 
Liverpool made the cup final in 1996 though and finished 3rd in the league so were hardly what you'd call a side with massive problems.

Has it not occurred to you that Robbie's goals were the main contributory factor in our 'decent' season ?. Bearing in mind we'd finished 8th a couple of seasons prior. & as such, simply backs up my argument about the quality of the guy - Ole joined a dominant, attacking side that had just won it's 3rd title in 4 years. His goals were always going to be easier to come by, just by virtue of the fact he was surrounded by better players.......Can you not see that ?
 
I wasn't too arsed when he (Torres) left to be honest. As great a striker as he is (when he is fully fit) he is nowhere near as potent as a Carroll - Suarez partnership.

How many games have Carroll and Suarez played together?! Has this RAWKite just came back from the future where Caroll and Suarez are lighting up the Premier League together?

I love how Dippers jump to the "it's on!" bandwagon in a flash!
 
And that, Scousers, is how you show respect to a player being carried off the pitch.
 
Few things in football, other than Liverpool winning, could give me greater pleasure than seeing Paul Scholes' career ended by a horrible, knee-high tackle. If his leg required amputation afterwards I'd be walking around cross-eyed with a wet patch on my crotch for a considerable amount of time.

I fecking hate him. Die Ginger Career, Die.

Few things in football, other than Liverpool winning, could give me greater pleasure than seeing Paul Scholes' career ended by a horrible, knee-high tackle. If his leg required amputation afterwards I'd be walking around cross-eyed with a wet patch on my crotch for a considerable amount of time.

I fecking hate him. Die Ginger Career, Die.

Laughed out very loud there.

I would fecking love to see Paul Scholes suffer a traumatic amputation on the pitch. Both legs would be nice but one would do at a push.

...
 
What lovely people they are.

That kind of comment about one of their players, would get a suspension on here.

Nasty, jealous and vindictive sums it up. And classless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.