Ronaldo never did it in the Premier League, or any league in England for that matter. Stick him up front in Stoke on a wet, windy and freezing night with Huth on him and Delap dropping deep and he wouldn't have been half as effective. Great striker my arse. Not fit to wipe Fowler's deadly boots.
You could say they same for fowler never having done it in europe or a world cup
If it's any consolation, I did find the minutes per goal ratios of Cole, Solskjaer and Yorke during the treble season:
Yorke - 114.61
Cole - 129.3
Solskjaer - 69.86![]()
Yeah, a good league striker. Italy had them, Spain had them.
The Premier League is a much higher standard than the World Cup. Tottenham would piss the World Cup.You could say they same for fowler never having done it in europe or a world cup
Fowler = Kevin Davies.
The Premier League is a much higher standard than the World Cup. Tottenham would piss the World Cup.
You could say they same for fowler never having done it in europe or a world cup
What those stats don't tell you is that Fowler scored 25 league goals in season 94/95, & 28 League goals in 95/96. In his first 3 full seasons he averaged 24 Premiership goals a season.
Fowler scored a total of 120 goals in 236 appearances during his first spell at the club. Compared to Solskajaer's 91 in 235 games for a superior side.
If Robbie Fowler had been born a Mancunian, & scored the goals he did, for United. Then I dare say the opinions on here would have been ever so slightly different.
They don't tell you that because they were taken from a post/argument in which the two players were being compared over the same seasons while playing for their respective clubs.
You cannot know whether Ole may have scored more or less goals had he been in England during those earlier three seasons that you are referring to.
I am not, nor have I ever claimed that Ole is superior to Fowler, I was just making the point that he compares very favourably to Fowler over the same time period. i.e. Fowler doesn't "shit all over Solskjaer" as was the argument at the time.
You also go on about the strength of the United side, but that is using hindsight because we ended up being successful. The season Ole joined us, we had lost Hughes, Kanchelkis and Ince and were being written off as also rans in comparison to your spice boys side who were well up there in the title race between 1996-2002. This is further supported by the fact that you won a few pots in this period including the plastic treble of which you were all keen to gloat about being the dawn of a new era of dominance for Liverpool at the time. "ten reasons Liverpool will win the league this season" & "how the mighty have fallen" threads in the classics being splendid examples of this.
Helped out by those 4 in 10 minutes against Forrest.
Rawktard said:Manchester United suffer from a bad case of victim mentality. The paranoia that surround that club...Jesus.
Nah, Tottenham would knock 'em out in the semis.
Not quite true. Solskjaer joined a double winning team in 1996.
How many of those Ole goals were when he came on as a sub? I'm sure he was a sub more than Fouler.
Interesting stats.
I guess Solskjaers minutes/goals ratio would probably have been much better than Fowlers too.
Yep. Nail on head. Fowler was just your run-of-the-mill 'good league striker'.
ten-a-penny.![]()
Liverpool made the cup final in 1996 though and finished 3rd in the league so were hardly what you'd call a side with massive problems.
I wasn't too arsed when he (Torres) left to be honest. As great a striker as he is (when he is fully fit) he is nowhere near as potent as a Carroll - Suarez partnership.
RAWK in uproar why Scholes wasn't sent off.
And that, Scousers, is how you show respect to a player being carried off the pitch.
RAWK in uproar why Scholes wasn't sent off.
Few things in football, other than Liverpool winning, could give me greater pleasure than seeing Paul Scholes' career ended by a horrible, knee-high tackle. If his leg required amputation afterwards I'd be walking around cross-eyed with a wet patch on my crotch for a considerable amount of time.
I fecking hate him. Die Ginger Career, Die.
Few things in football, other than Liverpool winning, could give me greater pleasure than seeing Paul Scholes' career ended by a horrible, knee-high tackle. If his leg required amputation afterwards I'd be walking around cross-eyed with a wet patch on my crotch for a considerable amount of time.
I fecking hate him. Die Ginger Career, Die.
Laughed out very loud there.
I would fecking love to see Paul Scholes suffer a traumatic amputation on the pitch. Both legs would be nice but one would do at a push.
Did anyone read Paul Wilsons next year is their year article yet in sundays Guardian?
Check it can't copy and paste on this phone
They will be excited
We will laugh