SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

So. Have they exposed a recovered patient to the virus yet, to see if he developed immunity? I still see this being regurgitated, almost as fact, but I'm yet to see any real data from a reliable source that confirms or shed light on it. Any links or updates on this?
 
If I remember correctly the first YOLO paper was rejected for publication which struck me as a bit odd.
Probably. I think that the second version of SIFT was rejected several times too, but that was a long time ago. GAN paper was barely published (had a reject from Schmidhuber), and in general nowadays the majority of papers who get accepted get accepted in second/third attempt (effectively making the reviewing process 1year+, which is close to that of journals in other fields).

Same happens for Nature/Science (other fields). With the review process not being double-blinded, there are cases when a paper gets rejected, to only add a big name author, resubmit it and get accepted. So, it is a very imperfect process.
 
On the one hand I look at these hoarders and breakers and am utterly disgusted by the callous self serving nature of them. On the other hand it's no secret that we live in Tory/Trump land so it's sort of ingrained, to be outraged is to be not really paying attention.
 
I think that is the most likely scenario, but too many coincidences * are happening. https://nypost.com/2020/02/22/dont-buy-chinas-story-the-coronavirus-may-have-leaked-from-a-lab/

* The only biowarfare laboratory being located in Wuhan.
The original theory was that it came from bats, to change to it jumped from bats to some intermediate animal 20-70 years ago.
China accusing US that Us made the virus.
China launching directives to be extra careful in coronavirus research.
The cases probably starting in November, not in December as we thought, and China immediately arresting the doctor who detected it first.
The research in finding a vaccine being lead by a military expert in bioweapons.

I still think that it is very likely that it came from wet markets, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if it was leaked somehow, and then China was doing cover-up which made the situation even worse. So for me, in the last few days the conspiracy theory has jumped from close to 0%, to it might be possible though it is still quite unlikely.

I probably shouldn't, but:

FAO techno-thriller loving dabbling conspiracy theorists
(the virus shipped to the Canadian lab is not covid19; it's almost certainly MERS)

Interesting that he consistently says 2-3 months when referring to a shutdown.

At the end of the day, he's a tech-head; judging from his other answers, it seems he's a proponent of the higher-tech aggressive testing and 45 day-ish peaking and immediate rebound detection going on in the Asian countries. AKA don't fatalistically assume broad scale infection; see if you can't stamp it out and then block the borders.
 
Last edited:
3rd person died in Ireland.

Reading through her daughter's twitter feed, she says her mother (who was 88 with loads of underlying conditions) hadn't been outside the door since February as she was immobile. Only six people in contact with her since, none of whom showed any symptoms. Scary stuff.
 
3rd person died in Ireland.

Reading through her daughter's twitter feed, she says her mother (who was 88 with loads of underlying conditions) hadn't been outside the door since February as she was immobile. Only six people in contact with her since, none of whom showed any symptoms. Scary stuff.

To be fair some people don’t realise they have it, so it’s possible one of the six people had it.
 
80% is still short of 100%. And assumes being able to maintain full efficiency.

Anyway, I think food supplies are probably going to be okay as they'll be treated as a priority. I'm just talking about why that would need to be so.

Nearly every new page you state an opinion you have like it's a fact, then as soon as anyone disproves or calls you out on something, it's just pivot to the next thing. You should have gone into politics.
 
To be fair some people don’t realise they have it, so it’s possible one of the six people had it.

Oh yeah, I'm sure one of them did. I more meant it's scary that you could be feeling absolutely fine but still end up fatally infecting someone. Underlines the importance of keeping distance from the vulnerable but in this case someone had to be in contact with her as she needed care. What can you do but hope you don't have it?
 
20200318-174704.jpg

That reply. Gold.
20200318-174755.jpg
 
Lots of chatter on Tinternet and Watsapp that full military lockdown Friday onwards. General public to be told Thursday night to avoid panic and panic buying.
Might be just rumors though.
 
Germany has 0.23% fatality rate, by far the lowest from all countries with over 1000 infections. I am saying this every day, but this is extremely weird and I am surprised why no one (researchers, media) are not talking about this. They either don't know to count, or there is something more going on. Which as of now, I see four possibilities (in decreasing order of likelihood):

1) They are counting deaths differently. In Italy, if you are 100 years old and have all three of cancer, AIDS and diabates, and then get covid19 and die, you still count a death from covid19. Is this true for Germany or not?

2) They are doing more testings than other countries (apparently), so maybe their number is correct, while the number of other countries is wrong. So if Germany has same cases as Spain, but 20-30 times less deaths, then the real number of infected people in Spain is 20-30 times higher. This is very good news for the world, it means that the virus is much less lethal than we thought.

3) The virus there has mutated to something less lethal. Why only there?

4) Beer is superior to wine. Germans drink beer, Italians, Spanish and French drink wine.
 
Germany has 0.23% fatality rate, by far the lowest from all countries with over 1000 infections. I am saying this every day, but this is extremely weird and I am surprised why no one (researchers, media) are not talking about this. They either don't know to count, or there is something more going on. Which as of now, I see three possibilities (in decreasing order of likelihood):

1) They are counting deaths differently. In Italy, if you are 100 years old and have all three of cancer, AIDS and diabates, and then get covid19 and die, you still count a death from covid19. Is this true for Germany or not?

2) They are doing more testings than other countries (apparently), so maybe their number is correct, while the number of other countries is wrong. So if Germany has same cases as Spain, bu 20-30 times less deaths, then the real number of infected people in Spain is 20-30 times higher. This is very good news for the world, it means that the virus is much less lethal than we thought.

3) The virus there has mutated to something less lethal. Why only there?
Its 1)
 
Interesting.

Sorry for all the questions.. but:

How would they know you aren't just saying your going for groceries or generally lying about what you're doing though? Also, have they specified what physical activities are allowed? Golf can be quite isolating... :)

They dont. I'm in Italy and we have the same system, but we have been in it for nearly 2 weeks now. Its partly based on trust.

You can go for a run or to walk the dog but that's about it. Cycling is discouraged because if you have an accident they may not be able to help you.

edit: here is the government webpage advising what you can and cannot do (Google translate works well if you have it installed in your browser): http://www.governo.it/it/faq-iorestoacasa / https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.governo.it/it/faq-iorestoacasa
 
Last edited:
Germany has 0.23% fatality rate, by far the lowest from all countries with over 1000 infections. I am saying this every day, but this is extremely weird and I am surprised why no one (researchers, media) are not talking about this. They either don't know to count, or there is something more going on. Which as of now, I see three possibilities (in decreasing order of likelihood):

1) They are counting deaths differently. In Italy, if you are 100 years old and have all three of cancer, AIDS and diabates, and then get covid19 and die, you still count a death from covid19. Is this true for Germany or not?

2) They are doing more testings than other countries (apparently), so maybe their number is correct, while the number of other countries is wrong. So if Germany has same cases as Spain, but 20-30 times less deaths, then the real number of infected people in Spain is 20-30 times higher. This is very good news for the world, it means that the virus is much less lethal than we thought.

3) The virus there has mutated to something less lethal. Why only there?

The mean age of the infected and preexisting conditions might be lower than Italy.

There was also a report that Germany has more ventilators and medical support than other countries for some reason and they are capable of donating some and still be self sufficient.
 
Germany has 0.23% fatality rate, by far the lowest from all countries with over 1000 infections. I am saying this every day, but this is extremely weird and I am surprised why no one (researchers, media) are not talking about this. They either don't know to count, or there is something more going on. Which as of now, I see four possibilities (in decreasing order of likelihood):

1) They are counting deaths differently. In Italy, if you are 100 years old and have all three of cancer, AIDS and diabates, and then get covid19 and die, you still count a death from covid19. Is this true for Germany or not?

2) They are doing more testings than other countries (apparently), so maybe their number is correct, while the number of other countries is wrong. So if Germany has same cases as Spain, but 20-30 times less deaths, then the real number of infected people in Spain is 20-30 times higher. This is very good news for the world, it means that the virus is much less lethal than we thought.

3) The virus there has mutated to something less lethal. Why only there?

4) Beer is superior to wine. Germans drink beer, Italians, Spanish and French drink wine.

some other possible factors;

the general health of the population

age demographics

healthcare facilities

Italy getting caught on the hop / Germany having more time to prepare

variance (just bad/good luck on which demographics it spread to first)

I'd say 2 is the biggest factor though, which would reassuringly mean Germany is closest to the true figure (whilst they may both be outliers)
 
Germany has 0.23% fatality rate, by far the lowest from all countries with over 1000 infections. I am saying this every day, but this is extremely weird and I am surprised why no one (researchers, media) are not talking about this. They either don't know to count, or there is something more going on. Which as of now, I see four possibilities (in decreasing order of likelihood):

1) They are counting deaths differently. In Italy, if you are 100 years old and have all three of cancer, AIDS and diabates, and then get covid19 and die, you still count a death from covid19. Is this true for Germany or not?

2) They are doing more testings than other countries (apparently), so maybe their number is correct, while the number of other countries is wrong. So if Germany has same cases as Spain, but 20-30 times less deaths, then the real number of infected people in Spain is 20-30 times higher. This is very good news for the world, it means that the virus is much less lethal than we thought.

3) The virus there has mutated to something less lethal. Why only there?

4) Beer is superior to wine. Germans drink beer, Italians, Spanish and French drink wine.

1 will probably play a part but 2 is definitely true as well. In Poland we have 5 deaths from 250 cases but it seems that a lot more people are infected. I posted the story about infant falling out the window yesterday and entire family testing positive afterwards - that was a random accident, they’d not have been tested otherwise. Last night a doctor committed suicide, they tested him and showed positive as well. Plenty of random people testing positive.

US have 9k cases and 7 of them are NBA players. 7 in a random population of 450 players tested positive, that’s 1.6% of the league yet 0.003% of entire population. I know it’s a small sample and all but I honestly expect the real number of cases to be much higher.
 
Is this lock down actually happening.

I've heard nothing else all night and to be honest I'm fed up with my boss moaning he doesn't want people to work from home because of lack of productive work!!!!

The point is it's protecting people, if he doesn't trust us (proven by this situation) then long lerm I'm gone once it picks up again.

I've grown to hate people I work for through this drama.
 
Not sure if this has already been posted but it’s essentially an exec summary of the Imperial Collage study that freaked out the entire world over the weekend.
Yeah, this is why the media spin shitting on the government for not immeadiatly employing a ”suppression” strategy, as if it is the clear and obvious path out of here, is so misguided. The report is clear that their modelling suggests this whole situation is worse than we previously imagined and we would have to keep up these intense “suppression” measures until a vaccine is found, which could realistically be 18 months, maybe allowing a month of relaxed measures every so often.

At least Bill Gates thinks the assumptions in the Imperial modelling were a bit too harsh and the latest data from China could see a more optimistic revision. Will people shit on the government if strategy than changes again accordingly?
 
Germany has 0.23% fatality rate, by far the lowest from all countries with over 1000 infections. I am saying this every day, but this is extremely weird and I am surprised why no one (researchers, media) are not talking about this. They either don't know to count, or there is something more going on. Which as of now, I see four possibilities (in decreasing order of likelihood):

1) They are counting deaths differently. In Italy, if you are 100 years old and have all three of cancer, AIDS and diabates, and then get covid19 and die, you still count a death from covid19. Is this true for Germany or not?

2) They are doing more testings than other countries (apparently), so maybe their number is correct, while the number of other countries is wrong. So if Germany has same cases as Spain, but 20-30 times less deaths, then the real number of infected people in Spain is 20-30 times higher. This is very good news for the world, it means that the virus is much less lethal than we thought.

3) The virus there has mutated to something less lethal. Why only there?

4) Beer is superior to wine. Germans drink beer, Italians, Spanish and French drink wine.

Don't South Korea also have a death rate in the same ball park?
 
The mean age of the infected and preexisting conditions might be lower than Italy.

There was also a report that Germany has more ventilators and medical support than other countries for some reason and they are capable of donating some and still be self sufficient.

The most striking thing about the German stats is how few people are critical. They might have loads of ventilators but they’re not using them. Yet.

To me the biggest unknown variable is time. How long the virus has been endemic in a country. It seems to take several weeks before the really sick get really sick. So in the first few weeks after the virus reaches a country the mortality rate will be very low. I suspect it’s been endemic in Italy much longer than in any other European country (via their links to Chinese factories)
 
Is this lock down actually happening.

I've heard nothing else all night and to be honest I'm fed up with my boss moaning he doesn't want people to work from home because of lack of productive work!!!!

The point is it's protecting people, if he doesn't trust us (proven by this situation) then long lerm I'm gone once it picks up again.

I've grown to hate people I work for through this drama.
This seems to be a common theme at the moment. Bosses showing their true colours.
If they can't trust people to work from home then their business won't last very long in this new world.

If I worked in an office and the boss told me to come in even though I could work from home I'd tell him where to go
 
The most striking thing about the German stats is how few people are critical. They might have loads of ventilators but they’re not using them. Yet.

To me the biggest unknown variable is time. How long the virus has been endemic in a country. It seems to take several weeks before the really sick get really sick. So in the first few weeks after the virus reaches a country the mortality rate will be very low. I suspect it’s been endemic in Italy much longer than in any other European country (via their links to Chinese factories)

Where can I find the stats for critical cases within Germany?
Thanks in advance for sharing.
 
This seems to be a common theme at the moment. Bosses showing their true colours.
If they can't trust people to work from home then their business won't last very long in this new world.

If I worked in an office and the boss told me to come in even though I could work from home I'd tell him where to go
Not home, presumably.
 
0.23% is actually still pretty high isn’t it?
 
Don't South Korea also have a death rate in the same ball park?
They are around 0.7-0.8. They are also doing a lot of testing (even more than Germany). It could be that countries with more testings are having lower mortality rate, simply because they count more people as infected (by testing them in the first place), while those that do not do many testing, have a higher mortality rate (cause they detect only people who are sick).

If so, that is very good news. If the virus is 3-4 times less lethal than we think it is, then that is great.