Sergio Ramos | Signs new 5 year contract

What do you think of Sergio Ramos as a potential signing?


  • Total voters
    1,476
Status
Not open for further replies.
According to Sky Sources we are in talks with Real over a potential Ramos move.
 
Trying to follow this through tweets and clickbait articles is futile as no one really knows what's happening behind the scenes.
 
Trying to follow this through tweets and clickbait articles is futile as no one really knows what's happening behind the scenes.
you've basically summarised every transfer in the history of the interweb.
 
Trying to follow this through tweets and clickbait articles is futile as no one really knows what's happening behind the scenes.

At least its cheaper than ringing clubcall off of teletext as I once got bollocked for doing when I was a nipper...
 
What do our scouts be getting up to anyway? Because this is another opportunist signing that I'm guessing we weren't prepared for, not that I'm complaining.

I'd be worried if we were paying scouts to tell us about unknown talents like Sergio Ramos.
 
I wasn't stating whether it was true or false, I was backing up that the line has a proper source rather than being made up.

Anyway, the rejected bid is true. See the Tweets thread.
Oh yeah I know mate I wasn't directing that at you! It was at the Marca article.

Cheers. Never thought we'd get Ramos tbh, just hope we don't get shafted by Madrid regarding De Gea.
 
Also mentioned that he would love to sign a new bumper deal at Real. :(
their source is ballbag and he thinks ramos is doing this for a better contract.
 
That's my point, I'm assuming our scouts didn't identify Ramos.

I wonder if the Ronaldo and De Gea ordeals haven't resulted in a slight change of policy at the club?
We may well have decided that there's less value in scouring South America and Southern Europe for talent if they're only going to want off to Madrid or Barcelona once they begin to flourish.

Focus our scouts at home and in the traditional strongholds of North-West and Eastern Europe for talent while looking to bring in proven talent from elsewhere. Problem is that the homegrown "wonderkids" are few and far between lately.
 
I wonder if the Ronaldo and De Gea ordeals haven't resulted in a slight change of policy at the club?
We may well have decided that there's less value in scouring South America and Southern Europe for talent if they're only going to want off to Madrid or Barcelona once they begin to flourish.

Focus our scouts at home and in the traditional strongholds of North-West and Eastern Europe for talent while looking to bring in proven talent from elsewhere. Problem is that the homegrown "wonderkids" are few and far between lately.

Doubt it. Does it really matter if they bugger off after giving us some golden years? So long as we make a profit on them.

Better to have loved and lost then to not have loved at all, and all that jazz.
 
I wonder if the Ronaldo and De Gea ordeals haven't resulted in a slight change of policy at the club?
We may well have decided that there's less value in scouring South America and Southern Europe for talent if they're only going to want off to Madrid or Barcelona once they begin to flourish.

Focus our scouts at home and in the traditional strongholds of North-West and Eastern Europe for talent while looking to bring in proven talent from elsewhere. Problem is that the homegrown "wonderkids" are few and far between lately.
May well be right, Memphis is a good example, most Dutch stars seem to have been happy to remain in the PL during their best years.
 
I know, don't know why I typed new lol.
It really takes effect around now though, all those contract renewals in a squad made up of 80% foreigners will take it's effect.

The Beckham Law (insofar as it applies to people earning over 600k a year, eg: footballers) ended with contracts beginning in 2010. It was only ever relevant for foreign players. So the only players it really affected who are still at Madrid are Ronaldo and Benzema who renewed last year.
 
Doubt it. Does it really matter if they bugger off after giving us some golden years? So long as we make a profit on them.

Better to have loved and lost then to not have loved at all, and all that jazz.

We didn't get the golden years of either, we got a couple of good years showing the promise of what was/is to come. We also got the inconsistent development years.

We don't need to make a profit on selling players. We show that by letting the likes of Brown, O'Shea, Vidic, Evra, Nani, Anderson, Bebe and many more go for absolute peanuts. We'll be far more profitable by reestablishing our image as one of the most illustrious and desirable clubs in the world. That's what we were before 2008 but we've lost our way. Partly because of the Ronaldo/De Gea sagas, partly because of a few years of terrible transfer policy and partly because we're developing a reputation for throwing silly money around like the lottery winning hillbilly attending a high society gala for the first time.

Better still to love and grow old together.
 
Of course not much needs to be known about Ramos, he's a proven quality centre-back. I'm just saying a lot of our recent transfers have been opportunist signings that I'm guessing players haven't been extensively watched or bids prepared, so I'm wondering who we are scouting.

Most transfers involving a lot of money are opportunist signings. A Real Madrid scouting manager said that at any given time they're keeping tabs on a couple of hundred players, 20 per position basically, of various ages/specifications/pricetags. That basically includes knowing their contract status and move-ability. Which is why we hear of them being "in the hunt" for just about everyone. On top of that they get the agents who contact them with their latest client updates.

I would guess we're not that different, except they see us as Tescos and we view them as Waitrose (special offers only).

As to Ramos. I do think the situation has more to it than a simple contract renegotiation. The Real Madrid propaganda machine is blaming Ramos' for being greedy. Ramos thinks they are setting him up for the same kind of negative publicity and marginalisation that previous captains have been through there and he might choose to jump now rather than get pushed later.

Anyway, if we get him, he'll be good for us. In fact I think he'll surprise a fair few people who don't watch La Liga much. We'll be a better team and we'll have a better defence. I just hope there aren't any longterm medical issues lurking (he missed a fair few games last year) - if there were it might explain the way Madrid/Perez are seemingly willing to put him on the market.
 

"Florentino has asked Ramos to stay" :devil::devil:
Pedrerol, journalist pro Madrid board, has a sport program in spanish Tv in the lunch time and is the presenter of "El Chiringuito".
 

"Florentino has asked Ramos to stay" :devil::devil:
Pedrerol, journalist pro Madrid board, has a sport program in spanish Tv in the lunch time and is the presenter of "El Chiringuito".

Then De Gea will stay as well :devil: can't see Woodward losing face now to be honest.
 
He's 29 already, not the most reliable cb and the amount rumoured is too high. Not good business, imo.
Madrid are doing good business if they sell Ramos for Otamendi.
I see where you are coming from but I am not sure I agree. Obviously Otamendi has been better than Ramos over the last season so I understand why you think he would be an upgrade on Ramos. The worry I would have about Otamendi over Ramos is that I am not sure he could do as well as Ramos has in the high defensive line Madrid have employed for quite a while now. Ramos is faster and Madrid leave much more space at the back than Valencia do and are not set up to protect their defence as much as Valencia are.

I suppose in Otamendi's favour you could argue that due to the gap in quality between Madrid and Valencia, Madrid spend much less time defending than Valencia do and perhaps as a result Ramos gets more of an easy ride (and that is also taking into account that while teams like Madrid generally concede less chances, the chances conceded by teams playing with a high line such as Madrid, Barcelona and Bayern amongst others are much more clear cut and harder to deal with for defenders than chances conceded by teams defending deeper due to there being more space and more 3 v 3 and sometimes 4 v 3 situations for them to handle). Even so, it still shows that signing Otamendi and having him replace Ramos is not without risk and it is not a given that he would be an upgrade when you take into account how Madrid play.

Then again, Benitez is in the hotseat next year so all this talk of a high line might be pretty moot.....
 
Last edited:

"Florentino has asked Ramos to stay" :devil::devil:
Pedrerol, journalist pro Madrid board, has a sport program in spanish Tv in the lunch time and is the presenter of "El Chiringuito".

Best get ready to get his new contract with a nice big fat salary figure on it then hadn't he. :D

I do think Ramos will end up staying. Unless Madrid find a new CB signing in the meantime and we offer Ramos a bigger salary.
 

Sid Lowe (The Guardian) talking about the Ramos transfer

14:50 in
 
hZdxvr.gif
And then they proceeded to put 5 past the Spanish defence.
 

Sid Lowe (The Guardian) talking about the Ramos transfer

14:50 in
Just listening now myself, I love that United just absolutely suckerpunched Madrid by bringing up Ramos in a discussion that was supposed to be about de Gea :lol:
 
We are always involved in a transfer saga these days. One might even say we do it for marketing purposes...
 
He said he doesnt know if it will happen but it is more than just Ramos trying to extract a better contract out of Madrid. He seems to imply he suspects it will happen. Then there's a period of a few minutes where they are drowned out by the noise of a motorbike and a siren. Then they start speculating about who might come in to replace him if he leaves.
 
Can't access at office - could you summarize it for us? Thanks
Ramos issue isn't solely about money, he met with Madrid's sporting director (not Perez) and asked to leave. Madrid said they'd listen to any offers but may decide that it's either buy out or nothing (in other words, if it's buy out only Ramos is going nowhere). United's interest is genuine, they met with Madrid, Madrid thought United were there to negotiate about de Gea, but instead took Madrid aback by talking about Ramos.
 
He said he doesnt know if it will happen but it is more than just Ramos trying to extract a better contract out of Madrid. He seems to imply he suspects it will happen. Then there's a period of a few minutes where they are drowned out by the noise of a motorbike and a siren. Then they start speculating about who might come in to replace him if he leaves.
Laporte as Ramos replacement :(
 
Even if it doesn't result in a better contract and he does actually end up coming to United am I hopeless romantic in preferring us to sign players who move because they badly want to play for Manchester United rather than targetting players whose primary objective is leaving their current club to prove a point, with their choice of destination up in the air?
 
Even if it doesn't result in a better contract and he does actually end up coming to United am I hopeless romantic in preferring us to sign players who move because they badly want to play for Manchester United rather than targetting players who are leaving their current club to prove a point, not really caring about where they end up?

Yes you are being hopelessly romantic :)

However, in this case it seems as if United is a right fit for Ramos, because of his dad's love for United. Or the love which Ramos has. Whatever. Read this:

"I was pleased to get United. They are in the Premier League what Madrid are in Spain perhaps: the values, the history. What they have always represented, the philosophy they transmit, the ideals they inculcated their players with, are similar.

"Few games have the repercussion of this match. And I'd rather play them than a team that's not as big but comes along and surprises you. Besides, I like English football."

Enough to move there? "When you go through a bad spell all sorts of things go through your mind and there have been times when I've had offers from England and Italy but my Dad told me once: 'If you are ever going to leave anywhere, do it through the front door and with your head held high, not when things are going badly.' My dream is to keep playing here but it's true that England's attractive. Friends playing there always talk highly [about it] and it would be a new experience.

"My Dad used to watch a lot and he would say to me when I was a kid: 'Come and watch this. Look at this guy …' I wouldn't say he obliged me to watch it but pretty much. He'd say: 'Today so-and-so is playing; watch him.'" And who did he support? Ramos grins. "Manchester United." Divided loyalty, then? "Haha, no! My dad always had a soft spot for Manchester but my family are Sevilla fans – and now Real Madrid."

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/feb/10/sergio-ramos-manchester-united
 
Even if it doesn't result in a better contract and he does actually end up coming to United am I hopeless romantic in preferring us to sign players who move because they badly want to play for Manchester United rather than targetting players whose primary objective is leaving their current club to prove a point, with their choice of destination up in the air?
In this day and age, I think so, yes.

I have given up dreaming of loyalty or real affiliation for the club. For me the age profile is the most important thing. If we are going to shell out more than £30m on a defender Id like to feel we will get many years of service. Plus, as you pointed out many years ago - a point that has stuck with me ever since - when you have a lot of young or old players, you get more injuries, whereas with players in the 23-29 bracket (I cant remember what you suggested was the 'peak years' range) your body is at full strength and you are less likely to get injuries.

So my worry is Ramos may start to get more and more injuries. Did I read somewhere earlier (probably above) that he has been injured a fair bit this season just gone? Could be the beginning of that new phase for him?
 
http://www.marca.com/en/2015/06/25/en/football/real_madrid/1435220504.html

Sergio Ramos and Real Madrid are in agreement over one thing at least: the current conflict must be resolved within the next two weeks before pre-season begins.

Neither the club nor the player want their differences to affect the start of the Benítez project. The new coach is a somewhat perplexed figure observing the war taking place in the upper echelons of Real Madrid involving the man who will probably be his captain next season.

'Los Blancos' will jet off to Australia on 11th July, which is the target date to have reached a solution in the Ramos saga.

Pre-season will be full of events in which Florentino will stand alongside his players, which adds to the need for relations to be as positive as possible.

Both parties are also all too aware of the potentially suffocating media pressure that will only increase as the days pass by, which is why the current priority is for whatever has to happen to happen quickly.


Should be resolved before 11th July. Even if Ramos and Real Madrid do come into agreement, we should have plenty of time to focus on other targets.
 
That podcast. With the motorbike and the police :lol: However, Lowe seems very certain that it not just contract problems. Altho he says that Laporte's buy-out is 30m euros. Surely not?
 
I think this one is 50-50 now. That's very good news for us United fans who have had nothing but misery in the transfer windows leading up to the last. I don't think De Gea is as big a bargaining chip as some think. Madrid arent desperate for him this season, they'll happily wait to get him for free next year but I think Perez wants a big name signing to please the fans. Ramos on the other hand seems like quite a passionate hot head which is why I think he could force his way out of that club.
 
I really don't understand some of the people complaining about his price tag.

A couple of days ago, Liverpool forked out £29m / €40m for Firmino! Who is Firmino? A 23 year old kid who has done literally next to night with his career. Whilst he may be a great "potential" signing, that fee is quite high considering his CV.

Meanwhile United have apparently bid £32-£35m / approx €45m+ for Sergio Ramos. A 29 year old, Spanish international who has won it all, A world Cup, 2 Euro Championships, 3 La Liga's, 1 Champions League, been voted La Liga defender of the year 3 times and made FIFA's world XI on 5 occasions.

If we get him, it'll be a fantastic bit of business. No doubt about it!
 
Well you pointed out the Firmino price was high. So we are measuring this deal against another deal that you say was not good value.
Despite that, Firmino is younger - therefore has his best years ahead of him. Plus he is a striker, and they usually cost more than defenders.
So that, in a nutshell, is why some people have their reservations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.