Theon
Lord of the Iron Islands
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,325
Brightonian - Yeah I agree with virtually all of that, you're analysis of Nasri/Silva is exactly the same opinion that I had. It's why getting a wide player like Navas was so important for them this season.
I think that the general issue of constricting the space that happened with Nasri/Silva has the potential to still happen. In addition to those two I think that Chelsea have had the same issue at times, and it is one reason Mata has looked worse with Oscar playing centrally. Point two is spot on though, and if we can retain some sort of directness then that will alleviate the issue somewhat. The trouble with that is that when you play narrow the tempo naturally drops and you start playing shorter passes.
In fact I think this could be an important point. When we play well the reason the direct, quick play that you talk about is possible is because we have that width out wide. Its been a trait of United going back to Giggs, Kanchelskis, Ronaldo, Nani, Valencia. Basically, the formation and set up does impact the style of play, City played slow and methodical because they were packed with central players, we play quickly because we stretch the pitch and have space out wide. If we change our system and become more like City under Mancini, then despite having different players we could fall into the same pitfalls due to the system. So effectively my concern is with the system, not the players.
So IMO that brings us back to needed an example of this system actually working, and linked to that the problems I have with your Xavi/Iniesta example - I agree its an example of playing in confined spaces working well, but its also not a great example in terms of Rooney/Kagawa for a few reasons. 1) Different positions - there is far more space playing in central midfield than in the number 10 attacking midfield position. In the latter role Rooney/Kagawa will regularly be dealing with a press from midfield and defence, where Xavi just has a press in the midfield. We know all this though, the closer you get to the opposition goal the harder it is to retain possession. 2) The actual role of the players - Xavi and Iniesta have the role of ticking play over and keeping possession when they play in centre mid. Playing close together doesn't hurt that and it actually benefits them as it allows them to keep the ball with short passes. For Rooney and Kagawa they primarily need to create chances and score goals, which I don't think is at all helped by confining the space. The point here is that Xavi/Iniesta look good playing close together because it helps them do what they're supposed to be doing, but it doesn't necessarily apply in the same way to Rooney/Kagawa (it might do, but we need a different example) 3) The ability of Xavi/Iniesta - I don't think there has literally been two footballers who have ever been as good playing in small spaces as these two, they're just the perfect players to play in a confined space. So that being said, the fact they manage to do it so effectively doesn't mean Kagawa/Rooney will be able to. I could imagine Rooney especially struggling with that style of play. Probably even more than Nasri.
At the moment I'm on the fence about what you're saying and the reason is that I haven't seen the system work (that I can recall), whereas I saw it look awful so much for City and other teams.