AVARiCE
Full Member
I have worked in 2 call centres, both of them took under 18s (I was 17 when I started) and with no experience, it is harder at 16, I was under the assumption we were talking about adults as the typical age bracket reported in these riots is 25, then again you wouldn't be expecting 16 year olds to be in as desparate need a job, typically living at home and going to college but for those who don't go to college and don't live at home I can understand your point there. I guess I could sympathise with your point if you're that age, but 18+ there isn't really an issue unless you set your standards too high. You could walk into a bar and get a job, any call centre and get a job etc if you were desparate enough.
Please don't take this the wrong way but I don't know how old you are and I don't like making assumptions. However, it would appear as though things have changed. In London, call centres rarely hire under 18's. I presume it's because they don't trust the professionalism of anyone younger.
I'd also like to point out that when I made a point about voters being aggrieved earlier, I was told that the average rioter is younger than voting age. Right now it's whatever suits but I would say it definitely doesn't seem to be 25 average. 25 would be a tad old, if anything. Regardless, there are many demographics, each with a reason to be frustrated with their quality of life.
You wouldn't expect 16 year olds to be desperate for jobs, yet they are. Some of these kids belong to low income families (we have a lot of those in London!) and they're expected to start bringing something home for the family. That's without their social lives being taken into account too. A lot of them are also saving for driving lessons. I think we can all empathise with that.
I think you're forgetting the impact of the recession. Whereas before any 18 year old could get barwork, the bars now have a choice of experienced bar workers who would like jobs as their original pubs close. Everyone's been bumped down the rung. Yes, there are jobs out there but they're not easy to get and you're in competition with every Tom, Dick and Harry for them.
It just seems like an excuse for people to hide behind that because they either a.) genuinely can't get a job for whatever reason or b.) don't want to do the work that businesses are actively advertising for that they need to go and smash some shops up and loot some free stuff and try to break into peoples houses and rob them. Like Plech has already said, these guys are just bored and think it's a laugh.
I'm going to have to completely disagree here. Again though, if I were to assume this was true, surely we should question why thousands of youths in one city seem to think smashing people's houses is a cure for boredom? I can't see how "boredom" can be offered as an answer within its own right. If anything, it raises more questions!
I'm glad you're here to tell us how we think.
Nick I'm sure you're aware of the esteem I hold you in as a poster but I think you're way off the mark today. I'd agree with the original post in that people aren't taking what he's saying on merit. Politicking aside, he's currently the only senior figure who's looking deeper than the surface.