Guy Incognito
Full Member
Monday morning spin. They could have afforded him, he just wanted to go to Barca.
How on earth did they get over £11m for him? That's the price we'd sell our first team deadwood.
Christian HeidelHow on earth did they get over £11m for him? That's the price we'd sell our first team deadwood.
Spin spin spin. City inflating wages of players they have missed out on. I do not believe for a second De Jang was asking more than what they pay KDB.
C'mon. You can't really believe De jong is on 300k/week.Why not? He literally had City, PSG and Barca all desperate to sign him. Of course his wages are going to be astronomical, he needs a new agent if not. The reports I've seen state around £300k a week. City do try a lot of 'spin' when they miss out on signings but this one probably has some truth to it, in that City were not willing to give him more than or parity with de Bruyne, and even if we did, he'd probably have chosen Barcelona anyway.
C'mon. You can't really believe De jong is on 300k/week.
Many top UK newspapers quoting £300k per week (an odd one says €300k/£260k).No way he is on 300k, he is not coming from a top team ffs.
I've read Guardiola often commenting on refusing to enter into an auction for a player once a fee etc.has been agreed.Financial dopers constantly whining about money. Guardiola has been complaining about it for weeks too "oh we haven't spent this on transfer fees" "oh we can't compete on wages". fecking embarrassing. Really wish someone else was in the title race as having to cheer on this horrible club makes me feel slightly sick inside.
This latest article from Jamie Jackson reads like a statement from Manchester City that's just published wholesale in the Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/football/2019/jan/28/manchester-city-rabbi-matondo-schalke-12m
I might be bring biased but I don't see what's wrong with that article, seems like basic facts, what do you think is wrong with it?
Its written by Jamie Jackson.I might be bring biased but I don't see what's wrong with that article, seems like basic facts, what do you think is wrong with it?
How on earth did they get over £11m for him? That's the price we'd sell our first team deadwood.
That could be said about any Jamie Jackson article though, to be fair.Its written by Jamie Jackson.
Pep doesn't handle pressure well and we saw it with Barca. Kinda expecting a meltdown of him by the end of the season.
If you are still within 1 goal of City you stand a chance, all games City lost, They took the lead
Or if you're us we can afford to give them a 2 goal advantage
It's actually quite unexplainable how totally dominant they are week after week after week and then suddenly they go and loose a game out of no where all the while Liverpool scrape wins week after week after week and never have it catch up on them
If I were a City fan I'd be fuming
Looks like Pep from the first season with this uninteresting and awkward interviews.
He needs to get back on the coke. He was a much more interesting, jittery, energetic lurk then.
HE looks stoned as hell there.He needs to get back on the coke. He was a much more interesting, jittery, energetic lurk then.
It's weird when the interviewer was asking him about an event in the game and he looked like he doesn't remember it at all. Was he even concentrating on the game he was managing in ? Very awkward.
Looks like Pep from the first season with this uninteresting and awkward interviews.
Why couldn't they do this last year?
That's now three games they've lost after taking the lead within a month