Westminster Politics


Universal free school meals would cost £24bn, and around £8bn if tied to universal credit. Both investments would bring a positive return given the benefits they would bring. And the person's point still stands - this government's spending decisions are not based on any coherent set of principles
 
Universal free school meals would cost £24bn, and around £8bn if tied to universal credit. Both investments would bring a positive return given the benefits they would bring. And the person's point still stands - this government's spending decisions are not based on any coherent set of principles

Are you sure of the bolded? IFS seems to reckon it'd cost around 2.5 Billion and around 1 billion respectively (as of March last year):

Institute for Fiscal Studies said:
With Scotland, Wales and London committed to more universal provision – and a bill to offer free school meals to all primary pupils in England currently before Parliament – new IFS research published today, and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, explores the options and trade-offs for potential expansions of free school meals in England. The research finds that:
  • Expanding eligibility to all state school pupils (primary and secondary) whose families claim universal credit could cost about £1 billion a year in the longer term, a 70% increase in spending on free school meals.
  • Instead offering free school meals to all state primary school pupils (as the London mayor will pilot from September) would also cost around £1 billion a year. This would benefit children in Years 3 through 6 (free school meals are already universal in Reception through Year 2). Offering free school meals to all state school pupils (Reception through Year 11) would cost about £2.5 billion a year, nearly trebling current spending. Neither of these reforms would directly impact the very poorest children, who are already eligible for means-tested free school meals.
 
While everything else is going on, this stupid bit of legislation has now come in. So if you haven't lived in the UK for over 15 years now you can still vote in the elections. Of course nothing to do with the fact the ex pats vote Tory of course.
 
While everything else is going on, this stupid bit of legislation has now come in. So if you haven't lived in the UK for over 15 years now you can still vote in the elections. Of course nothing to do with the fact the ex pats vote Tory of course.

Why should people who don’t live here permanently get to choose how the people who do are governed? Revolutions have been started for less
 
Why should people who don’t live here permanently get to choose how the people who do are governed? Revolutions have been started for less

Because they vote Tory simple as and they can donate to the Tory party. The previous rule was 15 years now it's unlimited. Not to mention the amount of work required to get them registered. Alot of these idiots are the ones who voted for Brexit.
 
Because they vote Tory simple as and they can donate to the Tory party. The previous rule was 15 years now it's unlimited. Not to mention the amount of work required to get them registered. Alot of these idiots are the ones who voted for Brexit.

Oi, Brexit probably wouldn't have happened if this had been the rule in 2016.
I've paid loads of tax in the UK since I left 17 years ago and get nothing for it.

But I wouldn't vote unless there was another referendum as there's no-one decent to vote for.
 
Why should people who don’t live here permanently get to choose how the people who do are governed? Revolutions have been started for less
I'm a citizen and still own property and pay taxes there.
Because they vote Tory simple as and they can donate to the Tory party. The previous rule was 15 years now it's unlimited. Not to mention the amount of work required to get them registered. Alot of these idiots are the ones who voted for Brexit.
The electioneering going on with this and voter ID would be vilified by the press if it was in Turkey or somewhere else.
 
Oi, Brexit probably wouldn't have happened if this had been the rule in 2016.
I've paid loads of tax in the UK since I left 17 years ago and get nothing for it.

But I wouldn't vote unless there was another referendum as there's no-one decent to vote for.

If people can demonstrate like with situations like yourself that you have a connection like paying tax, have a business etc then its fine but for people who've moved away and have no link with the country, I have no idea why they are allowed to vote.
 
If people can demonstrate like with situations like yourself that you have a connection like paying tax, have a business etc then its fine but for people who've moved away and have no link with the country, I have no idea why they are allowed to vote.

Most countries are like that; the Uk was one of the exceptions. Whatever the government policy is, it will affect British people abroad in one way or another. Brexit being the prime example, re education, movement, jobs, healthcare , pensions and so many hundreds of other implications that affect Brits who have moved overseas.
 
it’s amazing how many of you don’t seem to realise that as soon as the forens are all on rowanda then we will all have a grand a month more money in are pockets to spend at the pub and are penises will grow 3 inches. we can go back to how the country was during the wars and blitz spirit.
 
And with one bound...Sunak is off the hook, ......blessings be upon President Paul Kagame from the Tory faithful :lol:

Sunak is far too stubborn to even think about doing that. Even though it would be a more sensible thing to do than risk his future on his Rwanda policy, which is never going to work.
 
Sunak is far too stubborn to even think about doing that. Even though it would be a more sensible thing to do than risk his future on his Rwanda policy, which is never going to work.

True, but you could almost think he set it up, Sunak phoned the Rwanda President and said.. "look if you are asked a question on this at Stavros, just say you will give the money back, if no one turns up"

....fact is stranger than fiction :lol:
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-68001957

The president of Rwanda offers to pay the money back if no one is sent to his country.

Quick before he changes his mind. Grab the money we have spent and look for another option.
That's a win for the public and loss for Sunak really. It's an admission that it was never going to work but what then? His entire platform for votes this year was stopping boats with Rwanda, all eggs were in that basket, and it's not happening.
 
Yeah that's truly a heartbreaking read. We taught ours the usual emergency situation routines but at 2 years old there's only so much you can get them to do.