ha_rooney
Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 39,026
Not at all. Why would they? They are utterly unaccountable and completely untouchable.They truly don't give a feck, do they?
Well not if your employer had told you it was OK... like it seems their employer didI would get the sack for doing this
That must be rubbish though. I work for a local authority and they would shit themselves if I used my personal email for work purposes and then they would shit all over me. At a national Government level? Can't be right.Well not if your employer had told you it was OK... like it seems their employer did
Dunno I mean I work at government level with dozens of governments have no issues being security vetted by over 50 governments and use Gmail regularly with them... probably its more hassle to administer but if its if a net benefit I guess they don't care about the adminThat must be rubbish though. I work for a local authority and they would shit themselves if I used my personal email for work purposes and then they would shit all over me. At a national Government level? Can't be right.
Also, the governing body for my job would probably ban me, even if I somehow avoided the sack.
They truly don't give a feck, do they?
That must be rubbish though. I work for a local authority and they would shit themselves if I used my personal email for work purposes and then they would shit all over me. At a national Government level? Can't be right.
Also, the governing body for my job would probably ban me, even if I somehow avoided the sack.
Fair enough, sounds like you work much further up the government chain than me, so would definitely know better. I'm just at a (very) local level. What I can say is, we can't go a four week period without some reminder about data security. There's even a reminder on our screensaver.Dunno I mean I work at government level with dozens of governments have no issues being security vetted by over 50 governments and use Gmail regularly with them... probably its more hassle to administer but if its if a net benefit I guess they don't care about the admin
Probably more likley I help them achieve external targets and make them look good so they are more flexible ... local government it typically harder in my experience that national... or at least whe the national government tells theocal government its ok they just accept itFair enough, sounds like you work much further up the government chain than me, so would definitely know better. I'm just at a (very) local level. What I can say is, we can't go a four week period without some reminder about data security. There's even a reminder on our screensaver.
Probably more likley I help them achieve external targets and make them look good so they are more flexible ... local government it typically harder in my experience that national... or at least whe the national government tells theocal government its ok they just accept it
Edit just to say there can be logical reasons to use Gmail or similar in some instances
Some government departments use Gmail, but they set up and administer those accounts. There is a difference between that and using personal Gmail.Dunno I mean I work at government level with dozens of governments have no issues being security vetted by over 50 governments and use Gmail regularly with them... probably its more hassle to administer but if its if a net benefit I guess they don't care about the admin
Not at all. Why would they? They are utterly unaccountable and completely untouchable.
Corruption? Ignore it.
Inquiry Results? Reject them.
Formal independent findings of bullying? Shrug
Blatant failures exposed? Say the people just want us to get on with job and blank it.
Press scrutiny? Exclude them and make sure you're people control the media and get the stories.
Caught lying? Lie again, warp reality and deny it.
And their poll lead continues to grow...and their majority is unassailable.
My god Johnson at PMQs, astonishingly bad.
It's also worth noting that they aren't disclosing how much the British taxpayer is going to have to pay for Nissan to stay.
I think PMQs would be better if every opposition MP was allowed a follow-up question. Bozo never answers but at least some bank benchers could get it on record.I have given up on listening/watching PMQ. It has become even more of a circus than ever.
Starmer gets 6 questions and Boris makes zero attempt to even understand the question question let alone provide an answer.
Waste of time.
Absolute state of this:
I have given up on listening/watching PMQ. It has become even more of a circus than ever.
Starmer gets 6 questions and Boris makes zero attempt to even understand the question question let alone provide an answer.
Waste of time.
It's also worth noting that they aren't disclosing how much the British taxpayer is going to have to pay for Nissan to stay.
Yep. Thought I would have a look on the Worker's Party website. Thought it looked interesting for a second or two, then saw a picture of Galloway...won't be going back.Galloway is just a poisonous cnut like Farage.
Speaker does feck all to get Bozo to answer the questions.