Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 50,825
It depends. I rate the squad as being good, but it has, and has had for a long time, some glaring weaknesses. And those are being compounded by the other players who we've relied upon for a long time also not really doing it. People like Carrick are well into their thirties now. Are they going to be able to do it at the level they were? As for the manager being the problem, yeah, he's certainly a big part of it. The players have let themselves down too, though.It depends entirely on how much you rate the squad as it is. Personally, I think a competent manager could have a good crack at every single trophy with this current squad. I thought it last season, I thought it at the start of the season and I still vehemently believe it to be the case now. A few players, given who is leaving, is now imperative, but this unprecedented £200 million spend - I agree, we won't hit that mark - would just add to my belief that this squad should be challenging for every honour. We didn't need this money to buy success, a good or great manager, and we should have hired the best, would have improved the players at his disposal anyway.
The problem is the manager, and it has been from the outset. Improve on him and fourth will be a piece of piss.
I think it is a massive assumption, when you remove possible a half dozen players from the squad that had you challenging in the past. Referring to Rio as an "important" defender was wrong, in the sense that he's not playing, but last season he was outstanding. So you either need someone to step up or you're going to be left short. Vidic and Evra play regularly and usually do when fit. Then you have others that are being speculated as leaving, like Nani and Hernandez. They might not play every week but what guarantees do you have that the new players are going to be as good or better? Or that they'll even settle quickly?I don't really equate challenging as buying success. But a huge investment into a team has generally lead to a team challenging for a league in the past it's not a "massive" assumption. Most of the turnover of players will be players who are barely playing right now so I don't see why if an "Important defender" like Rio Ferdinand is let go it will lead to a massive downfall. Or is this the next excuse for Moyes?
Then again, all of what I've said is premised on the fact that though I think Moyes has done a really poor job, I'm not convinced it would have been a great season under Fergie either, at least in terms of winning the league, had he not seriously invested. I think all three of Rio, Vidic and Evra have gone past their best. Their replacements aren't nearly as good at the moment. Our midfield is still weak and that was a recurring theme under Fergie. Valencia and Young had both been reasonably poor last season, so I don't know if that would have changed had Fergie been here. So without the continuity of Fergie being here and knowing how to get the most out of this group of players, it's an even tougher ask to overhaul the squad at the same time as still being challengers. Look at Spurs and Liverpool, for example. They both brought in lots of new signings and very few are playing. Liverpool's greatest successes are the players that were already there. Spurs appear to have bought really badly in terms of the players being suited to the league. I don't see why that couldn't happen to us too.