Why did Moyes get rid of our backroom team in favour of Evertons?

Moyes is Heisinberg??? :eek:

Phil looks a bit like Jesse alright....I can picture him lying on a couch in Carrington, eating cheesy puffs and masturbating and counting it as "work done"

No, Moyes is "Walt". His metamorphosis into Heisenberg is only just beginning. The Swansea game is like the bathtub scene, it is all going wrong at the moment, but it is making him harder, he will be a badass by next season.
 
I don't mind him bringing in his own staff...Thats all well and good.

But putting Giggs and Neville as first team coaches was the stupidest thing he could have done.

As stupid as asking Solskjaer, Giggs, Scholes, Van Der Sar, (Gary Neville?), etc to take up coaching roles? That Sir Alex, what a twit.
 
No, Moyes is "Walt". His metamorphosis into Heisenberg is only just beginning. The Swansea game is like the bathtub scene, it is all going wrong at the moment, but it is making him harder, he will be a badass by next season.


So we can go from Geoff Shreeves saying to Moyes "Speak into the microphone...Bitch!!"

to

Moyes saying "Get off my territory"

Doubt it, considering Walt was still a gimp until season 3....And balls if you think Moyes is getting 3 seasons if this continues :p
 
Bizzare allegation, and frankly total rubbish in my opinion.

David Moyes had a lot of success at Everton and obviously worked well with certain indiviuals around him who he knows well and feels he can trust. Given that they played a large part in his success, and therefore in him ultimately getting the job in the first place, its not surprising that he decided to bring those people with him.

Fellaini was a player he knew at Everton - the other players the club targetted were not. The club let Moyes down in not getting the players he wanted - that it blatantly obvious. It was not his doing.

As regards the previous regime - the scounting network probably needed overhauling. If you look at the players brought in, the majority have done nothing. Hernandez has been an "under the radar" success. Jones and De Gea have big futures - but they were hardly a huge punt giving their pedigree and obvious talent. There have been loads of transfer busts going back years - more misses than hits.

Mulensteen may have moved on for a managers job - he is perhaps a loss. Phelan seemed to me to be the archtypical "yes man" and I cant see what he would bring to the party over and above what we have.

Fact is - things have to change. Moyes will want to put his stamp on the club and work in a system he is comfortable in - as every manager does. You dont see any top manager move clubs and not take his staff with him.

Fergie is gone - people need ot accept that. What helps nobody is Moyes coming in and trying to pick up where he left off because Fergie ran the club from top to bottom and had effectively built United from the ground up over the years, into what it is now. Moyes needs to work within that structure.

1. What success? Playing dour football and hoofball?

2. He wanted fabregas... Doh! What makes u think the club can do to get him realistically? Offer 100m and 400k wages before tax?

3. He didnt want herrera, not that we cany afford him

4. If we paid 30m for baines... Lord help us....

5. Coentrao is available on loan, he fecked up by leaving it too late, something a team like manchester united should have no problem getting a simple loan deal done if he indeed plan ahead and want him
 
As stupid as asking Solskjaer, Giggs, Scholes, Van Der Sar, (Gary Neville?), etc to take up coaching roles? That Sir Alex, what a twit.



Sir Alex, Rene, Phelan, Carlos etc were all first team coaches during the period them players retired(except Giggs)

Fergie stuck Solskjaer with the reserves...He didn't exactly fire Mike Phelan and replace him with Ole though did he? Or jump him up to the first team straight away...I know the point you're trying to make but none of them players were put as first team coaches
 
As stupid as asking Solskjaer, Giggs, Scholes, Van Der Sar, (Gary Neville?), etc to take up coaching roles? That Sir Alex, what a twit.

They would have been an addition, not a replacement. You can blood them while we have first class coach showing them the rope, not making them the head coach...

Rvp used to nutmeg phil neville, and you expect phil to coach him how to plat football??? What could phil know that evra dont know? Theyve been playing for almost the same amount of years
 
Cowardice. It's that simple. He brought his yes-men from Everton because they are what he knows. He guts the entire set-up, from coaches to scouts. Despite the advice of Ferguson, he removes men like Meulensteen and Steele who have been important figures in our success and the development of young talent. He refuses to take serious interest in a top young player like Thiago Alcântara, despite years of comprehensive scouting of the player by Ferguson's scouts, preferring to go only with what he knows. Taking this fear of the unknown to a new extreme, he makes his only first team signing the Marouane Fellaini. Very depressing. Worse still is the apparent attempt to appease the fans by making Phil Neville and Ryan Giggs important coaches despite zero experience. This would not be such a problem if Moyes kept on experienced, quality members from Ferguson's regime, but he sacked virtually all of them. Now the players are training with coaches from a mid-table club and two with zero experience (one of whom is still their teammate, unheard of at this level).
I'm in a bit of a rush and haven't time to read all the posts right now. Haven't really time to say exactly what I want to say either.

Until I have time to post my own thoughts I'll re-post your comments because I agree with everything you've written there. :)
 
Didn't he try to keep Rene but Rene turned the position down?

Then he didn't offer him the right position. Perhaps that was a bit glib but i'd have rather Moyes ruffled a few feathers with Everton colleagues than descend to cronyism with all of the risks it entailed.

Sir Alex's two best assistants were Queiroz and McClaren i think it is fair to say, neither of whom had prior relationships with Fergie or the club. If Mouyes is at United long enough he will eventually realise the necessity of an outsider's viewpoint if one is to keep evolving and maintain success. Moyes may have identified inherent flaws at United upon his arrival, yet who is there to tell him of those he brought from Everton?



I see people talking of the delight on here when Giggs and Phil were made coaches, i must confess that i recall mainly cynicism and doubt. Whilst the continuance of club ties is something to aspire to those individuals must be able to fill the roles required, the bestowing of a title doesn't mean they are fit to hold it [at least not instantly].
 
No disrespect but, if you are RVP, Rooney, Rio, Fletcher, Carrick, Nani, Evra, Vidic, are you really going to take notice of Phil Neville trying to coach you? Especially in his first year as a coach, when he keeps coming out saying to the papers that he's "learning on the job"....

It's hardly as if Phil is Moyes's number 2. With Moyes's hands on approach, Round and Lumsden, Phil is number 4 in the coaching staff. Not exactly a huge figure on the training ground every day.

Phelan was never going to be kept on as a number two because a manager would almost always bring his own assistant, and Rene wasn't going to keep the same role he had because Moyes does things differently. I don't see a major issue here. Nor do I believe things would have been much different. Frankly, with the way Rene has been talking these past few months, I fear we'd have had a bust up sooner rather than later. That would have done Moyes no good at all.
 
It's hardly as if Phil is Moyes's number 2. With Moyes's hands on approach, Round and Lumsden, Phil is number 4 in the coaching staff. Not exactly a huge figure on the training ground every day.


Maybe so...I don't know what goes on in training obviously but, I can't see Phil Neville taking a back seat. He was always known as a "busy body" so to speak. He'd be involved pretty a good bit I reckon. And he always seems to be on top of Moyes and Round on the bench, trying to get a word in. . . I reckon he plays a bigger role but thats just speculation by me
 
Phil, giggs, will be hailed as legend in smaller clubs for their experiences playing in highest level and winning everything, but in our current set up they are but a teammates you play with daily, i dont think respect and seniority aside there's anything he knows that other players dont know. They've been coached by the same manager for years.
 
Pick any of:

i) New man wanted his own trusted "lieutenants" with him or wasn't really comfortable working with people and methods he wasn't familiar with.

ii) Old coaches might not have wanted to work for someone else, or someone they might deem "inferior" to them (going by Rene's comments, there was a right chance that might have happened)

iii) Old coaches had other ambitions or wanted to give the new man his own identity and decided to leave

It might not have been the most ideal (or even looking back now, right) thing to do, stepping into a challenging post with so many changes happening all at once, but it's fairly normal practice tbf.
 
Because they are better than Fergie's staff, obviously. More likely because he wanted men he knew and understood, rather than new faces who would challenge him and have their own opinions.
 
I get people saying that it's normal practice, but this wasn't a normal transition, this isn't a normal club, and someone posted earlier stating that
Barca and Bayern kept some of their backroom staff... how many other clubs have?
 
Sure, plenty would take the payday and fame but how many of those would actually have the self belief that they could do a job? There's a reason why the manager was chosen and not picked from a group of applicants...and there's a good chance that it's because there wouldn't have been many qualified ones.

What boggles my mind is how many people seem to have an expectation of a smooth transition when losing a manager you've had for 27 years.
What's to say Moyes has the self belief to do it? It sure looks like he doesn't.

No one thought it would have been absolutely smooth, although with someone like guardiola or mourinho it could well have been, but it's been too far away from smooth. It's been absolutely calamitous stuff.
 
Hasn't it been more or less confirmed that Moyes wanted to keep Rene, but Rene wanted a new challenge? Pretty sure I read that somewhere when it was all going on. Apart from him, I don't really see what any poster on here can definitely say was a poor trade. Yeah, it seemed a bit odd to get rid of Steele who had been working so incredibly well with De Gea, but he's been great so far this season so there doesn't seem to be an issue there so far. Many United fans were wondering what exactly Phelan's contribution was, so it doesn't really make sense to somehow say it was a poor decision from Moyes to bring in a person he most likely trusts very much and works well with. It's very common for a manager to bring in a new assistant at the very least.

You'd think Moyes executed the entire old staff and brought everyone from Everton with him judging by some posts on here.
 
At the time I thought it was a perhaps a mistake and it seemed too drastic - another bombshell following Fergie's retirement.

On reflection It is completely acceptable for a new manager to bring in his own staff who he knows and trusts, especially at the start of a 'new era'. It is also completely normal to expect a transition period while this coaching (and scouting) team beds in and the players get to know them (Giggs and Phil aside!)
 
Its maybe normal for most clubs to remove most of the key staff... but to remove the DNA of the the most successful club in the UK with one that that is mediocre is both short-sighted and silly. Too much of a transition for the players too. You don't do this is the corporate world so why should you do it for football?
 
Its maybe normal for most clubs to remove most of the key staff... but to remove the DNA of the the most successful club in the UK with one that that is mediocre is both short-sighted and silly. Too much of a transition for the players too. You don't do this is the corporate world so why should you do it for football?
The good news is, the DNA is still mostly there.

The Pecking Order of MUFC

Sir Bobby - Sir Alex
David Moyes
Round, Chris Woods, Jimmy Lumsden, Ed WoodWard
Phil Neville, Ryan Giggs,


Okay, the DNA is pretty dead.
 
The good news is, the DNA is still mostly there.

The Pecking Order of MUFC

Sir Bobby - Sir Alex
David Moyes
Round, Chris Woods, Jimmy Lumsden, Ed WoodWard
Phil Neville, Ryan Giggs,


Okay, the DNA is pretty dead.

Almost pornstars of footie:


moyes.jpg
 
I don't know why, but I have a complete irrational hatred for Jimmy Lumsden. I honestly have no idea why, I think he just looks like a bit of a tosser (He might, for all I know, be the nicest guy ever!).
 
Just because other managers have been known to replace an existing coaching staff does not mean Moyes doing the same in this situation was the right decision. Neither does it make it wrong. This is why I feel such situations should be judged on a case by case basis. The club kept making sounds about continuity and stability. But please. Tell me how SAF and Gill leaving is stability & continuity when you appoint a CEO whose experience has mostly been selling deals and now he has to change his philosophy to buying top class players? Let alone a new manager with virtually no experience at a top club who does not get significant backing that he needed to strengthen a squad that everyone knew needed strengthening. And then he brings in fellow staff who he trusts but do not have much knowledge of the players or any experience coaching in such an environment?

Where is the stability and continuity in that? Personally I felt it was wrong not to heed Fergie's warning but there are valid points for both sides of the argument. The question for me is, is this the smooth transition we envisaged after the initial news that Moyes was going to be our new manager?

This doesnt mean that anytime we bring in a coach, they have to have title-winning experience or had to work at a top club. But for the "unique" situation that we're in as some have put it, I think it would have made sense to keep some of the old heads around to ease the blow. More than anything, our failure to improve in the summer killed us. It was the snowball effect that I feel has led to this scenario now. We have stagnated while others have improved and I really feel for Moyes in this regard. It was already a difficult proposition, but not securing the targets to inject some life into the squad, most importantly our starting XI has made this quite annoying and for him even more difficult.

Sorry for the rant...just an annoying situation.
 
Maybe the worst thing Moyes could have done on his arrival here, was letting the existing coaching staff go, and so many pointed it out at the time.

Normally managerial changes happen because the old regime was failing which gives justification to sacking the old coaching staff, but at a Manchester United the opposite was true, we had just experienced the most successful period in the Club's history with 5 Premier League titles and a Champions League (amongst other trophies and finals) in 7 years.

The old coaching staff knew how to coach a winning team, playing across 4 competitions over the course of a season. Moyes and his current staff had never done that. They have never been expected to win or at least be able to win every competition and they had never managed so many games. It's nice that we've have a good spell in the CL but our league form has been too poor in contrast. It's not either/or at United.

The old coaches knew the personalities in the dressing room inside out and how to get the best out of them. The players believed in them (with several singing their praises in public) and they responded to them. They knew the players personal needs and how they needed to be trained and they also knew (to use an old cliché) how to play the United way, which is a massive thing at this Club, because we are renowned for playing exciting, attacking, winning football - people will claim that some of the football recently under Fergie had been dull, last season we went behind several times for example but we knew how to put teams to the sword and scored lots of goals even if we conceded a few too.

The problem with getting rid of the old coaching staff is that they removed people the players knew and trusted so whatever was introduced would naturally be met with scepticism. Surely you only break up something that is proved to be working is you are definitely going to improve it and ultimately if what you replace it with isn't better it will no doubt be questioned.

There have been murmurings in the press since preseason (not just from Raymond verheijen or what ever his name is) that the players haven't been impressed with training. Without wanting to come across as patronising the current coaching staff, including Moyes, could have learnt a lot from Rene meulensteen, Phelan and Steele, with Moyes bringing Round and Lumsden for example, then making tweaks to the set-up as he sees fit after a period of settling.

I've searched for it and can't find it but whilst we were in the run-in last season I remember reading (or watching) an interview from Rene Meulensteen where he said that the players trusted him to deliver winning training sessions and to best prepare them for the upcoming games. Given how many he have lost this season and how many tepid performances there have been, that trust can't be there anymore. These players are playing without belief in themselves and that belief has to be instilled on the training ground.
 
There is nothing normal in sacking the entire backroom staff..
But Moyes thought he had a better chance with his guys so fine, look where that took us...
 
1. What success? Playing dour football and hoofball?

2. He wanted fabregas... Doh! What makes u think the club can do to get him realistically? Offer 100m and 400k wages before tax?

3. He didnt want herrera, not that we cany afford him

4. If we paid 30m for baines... Lord help us....

5. Coentrao is available on loan, he fecked up by leaving it too late, something a team like manchester united should have no problem getting a simple loan deal done if he indeed plan ahead and want him

1. Taking genuine and regular relegation fodder and getting them up the league and genuinely improving them. He had some money to spend and spent it well on players who have improved the team massively, some of whom have been sold on for big money. Martinez is doing well - with a squad built by Moyes and his team.

2. I dont see your point. The criticism was that he only signed one player, from his old club. My point was that he wanted other, better players. Whatever happened clearly there must have been some inclination that Fabregas might be interested. Whatever happened, he stayed, but the points stands.

3. and 4. - I dont know what you're referring to.

5. Again, how is this down to Moyes? The manager identifies the players and the relevant people at the club act. As it stands in this instance, was it not the fact that Madrid couldnt bring their chosen repalcement in time that meant it didnt go through?

Not sure what your point is to be honest. A lot of people seem to have an axe to grind with Moyes and I'm not sure why. He's not been given the tools to do his job properly by the board. He has, as to be expected, made mistakes, tactically and otherwise - but he's in a new job, probably the hardest job in football, so that was always going to happen.

Generally some bizarre attitudes on here. Some expecting a manager to come in and work with what the old manager left in terms of staff - seems to me like they just want Moyes to come in and try to be Fergie clone - which clearly isnt going to work and would likely end iin disaster.

Like I said, people have to accept that Fergie is gone - and he seems to have left at the right time, probably well aware of the shortcomings in the squad and the need to rebuild.

What some fans seem to want is a knee jerk reaction and see the manager sacked - as if its a given that another manager will come in and make this squad title challengers again. For me that isnt going to happen - too little quality, too many players edging over the hill, top players not adequately replaced over years - all adds up to where we are now - not a new manager coming in.

Moyes can't be judged yet - he needs time and the chance to bring in the players he needs to build a side. He may not prove to be the right man, but having given him the job the board needs to give him the opportunity.
 
Maybe the worst thing Moyes could have done on his arrival here, was letting the existing coaching staff go, and so many pointed it out at the time.

Normally managerial changes happen because the old regime was failing which gives justification to sacking the old coaching staff, but at a Manchester United the opposite was true, we had just experienced the most successful period in the Club's history with 5 Premier League titles and a Champions League (amongst other trophies and finals) in 7 years.

The old coaching staff knew how to coach a winning team, playing across 4 competitions over the course of a season. Moyes and his current staff had never done that. They have never been expected to win or at least be able to win every competition and they had never managed so many games. It's nice that we've have a good spell in the CL but our league form has been too poor in contrast. It's not either/or at United.

The old coaches knew the personalities in the dressing room inside out and how to get the best out of them. The players believed in them (with several singing their praises in public) and they responded to them. They knew the players personal needs and how they needed to be trained and they also knew (to use an old cliché) how to play the United way, which is a massive thing at this Club, because we are renowned for playing exciting, attacking, winning football - people will claim that some of the football recently under Fergie had been dull, last season we went behind several times for example but we knew how to put teams to the sword and scored lots of goals even if we conceded a few too.

The problem with getting rid of the old coaching staff is that they removed people the players knew and trusted so whatever was introduced would naturally be met with scepticism. Surely you only break up something that is proved to be working is you are definitely going to improve it and ultimately if what you replace it with isn't better it will no doubt be questioned.

There have been murmurings in the press since preseason (not just from Raymond verheijen or what ever his name is) that the players haven't been impressed with training. Without wanting to come across as patronising the current coaching staff, including Moyes, could have learnt a lot from Rene meulensteen, Phelan and Steele, with Moyes bringing Round and Lumsden for example, then making tweaks to the set-up as he sees fit after a period of settling.

I've searched for it and can't find it but whilst we were in the run-in last season I remember reading (or watching) an interview from Rene Meulensteen where he said that the players trusted him to deliver winning training sessions and to best prepare them for the upcoming games. Given how many he have lost this season and how many tepid performances there have been, that trust can't be there anymore. These players are playing without belief in themselves and that belief has to be instilled on the training ground.

Spot on mate.... I'm willing to bet the decision to replace the backroom staff made a lot of people uneasy, not just a few posters on the caf...

Sent using Tapatalk
 
Cowardice. It's that simple. He brought his yes-men from Everton because they are what he knows. He guts the entire set-up, from coaches to scouts. Despite the advice of Ferguson, he removes men like Meulensteen and Steele who have been important figures in our success and the development of young talent. He refuses to take serious interest in a top young player like Thiago Alcântara, despite years of comprehensive scouting of the player by Ferguson's scouts, preferring to go only with what he knows. Taking this fear of the unknown to a new extreme, he makes his only first team signing the Marouane Fellaini. Very depressing. Worse still is the apparent attempt to appease the fans by making Phil Neville and Ryan Giggs important coaches despite zero experience. This would not be such a problem if Moyes kept on experienced, quality members from Ferguson's regime, but he sacked virtually all of them. Now the players are training with coaches from a mid-table club and two with zero experience (one of whom is still their teammate, unheard of at this level).


Meulensteen WANTED to leave, Moyes didn't sack him. Thiago WANTED to join Bayern, nothing Moyes could've done there.

No offence, but that was one of the worst posts I've read on here in a long time. Nothing more than baseless accusations and doom mongering. Pull your head in.
 
I've searched for it and can't find it but whilst we were in the run-in last season I remember reading (or watching) an interview from Rene Meulensteen where he said that the players trusted him to deliver winning training sessions and to best prepare them for the upcoming games.

I recall an interview with Phelan where he said he had practically been the boss for 5 years. They may have been a great team, our coaching staff, but my god what our players miss most is their self-belief.
 
Maybe so...I don't know what goes on in training obviously but, I can't see Phil Neville taking a back seat. He was always known as a "busy body" so to speak. He'd be involved pretty a good bit I reckon. And he always seems to be on top of Moyes and Round on the bench, trying to get a word in. . . I reckon he plays a bigger role but thats just speculation by me

Maybe the worst thing Moyes could have done on his arrival here, was letting the existing coaching staff go, and so many pointed it out at the time.

Normally managerial changes happen because the old regime was failing which gives justification to sacking the old coaching staff, but at a Manchester United the opposite was true, we had just experienced the most successful period in the Club's history with 5 Premier League titles and a Champions League (amongst other trophies and finals) in 7 years.

The old coaching staff knew how to coach a winning team, playing across 4 competitions over the course of a season. Moyes and his current staff had never done that. They have never been expected to win or at least be able to win every competition and they had never managed so many games. It's nice that we've have a good spell in the CL but our league form has been too poor in contrast. It's not either/or at United.

The old coaches knew the personalities in the dressing room inside out and how to get the best out of them. The players believed in them (with several singing their praises in public) and they responded to them. They knew the players personal needs and how they needed to be trained and they also knew (to use an old cliché) how to play the United way, which is a massive thing at this Club, because we are renowned for playing exciting, attacking, winning football - people will claim that some of the football recently under Fergie had been dull, last season we went behind several times for example but we knew how to put teams to the sword and scored lots of goals even if we conceded a few too.

The problem with getting rid of the old coaching staff is that they removed people the players knew and trusted so whatever was introduced would naturally be met with scepticism. Surely you only break up something that is proved to be working is you are definitely going to improve it and ultimately if what you replace it with isn't better it will no doubt be questioned.

There have been murmurings in the press since preseason (not just from Raymond verheijen or what ever his name is) that the players haven't been impressed with training. Without wanting to come across as patronising the current coaching staff, including Moyes, could have learnt a lot from Rene meulensteen, Phelan and Steele, with Moyes bringing Round and Lumsden for example, then making tweaks to the set-up as he sees fit after a period of settling.

I've searched for it and can't find it but whilst we were in the run-in last season I remember reading (or watching) an interview from Rene Meulensteen where he said that the players trusted him to deliver winning training sessions and to best prepare them for the upcoming games. Given how many he have lost this season and how many tepid performances there have been, that trust can't be there anymore. These players are playing without belief in themselves and that belief has to be instilled on the training ground.

You seem to be suggesting that Moyes should take his lead from other, junior coaches in terms of training - none of whom have managed at any level. If that was required then what is the point in appointing Moyes in the first place? He will have his own ideas and way to do things, hence why he's a PL manager and the others in question aren't.

Unfortunately, it was always going to be "Revolution" not "Evolution" when Fergie retired in terms of the club moving on and entering a new era because that's how high profile managers work. They dont want to go into a club and be surrounded by people loyal to the old manager and face the inevitable - "Fergie doesnt do it like that..." day after day.

It may be different at a club where people are promoted internally, or where the set up is different with Directors of Football whan a manager is brought in purely to coach, but that's not the case here.

People are putting too much significance on the coaching and staff changes. The players are professionals - and supposed to be at the top of their tree. They are the ones underperforming, and if that's because things have "changed a bit", or it isnt like it was before then they need to take a long look at themselves.

If they cant do that perhaps they need to move on. Fergie always advocated this approach - that the Manager is the main man and that nobody is bigger than him. Infact, that's the legacy he's left at United.
 
For me it's only reasonable that he's changed things around in terms of his backroom team.

If only he'd shown the same willingness to change things around in terms of the squad or our style of play, I would be far more happy to give him time to make things work.

Right now we're giving him time to get nothing in particular working, because he's doing the same things as Fergie did, only slightly worse, since he's not Fergie.
 
Insecurity and it made it more difficult and costly to sack him!
 
I'm starting a new thread as I don't know which one of the multiple Moyes threads to put this in, plus I don't want to go off on some unrelated tangent. I just want to know the thinking behind getting rid of our successful management team and bringing in his Everton staff? Why couldn't there have been some kind of compromise?

The thread will probably only be a page long but I just want someone to explain to me why it was a good idea.
One of his biggest mistakes he did and it just didnt make any sense. I understand if the top guy wants to bring his own team but there is an obvious gap between Everton and Untied standards. Look at the football we currently play, it's the result of exactly that
 
1. Taking genuine and regular relegation fodder and getting them up the league and genuinely improving them. He had some money to spend and spent it well on players who have improved the team massively, some of whom have been sold on for big money. Martinez is doing well - with a squad built by Moyes and his team.

Yes, and he's doing shit with the squad build by SAF

2. I dont see your point. The criticism was that he only signed one player, from his old club. My point was that he wanted other, better players. Whatever happened clearly there must have been some inclination that Fabregas might be interested. Whatever happened, he stayed, but the points stands.

The point is, he's asking for unrealistic target, by which he should have known better the possibility of it happening is virtually close to impossible, and if he uses that as excuse, it will only shown his inept. All manager wanted better player, can Martinez blame the board if he wanted Ronaldo/Messi and can't get them?

3. and 4. - I dont know what you're referring to.

The board back him up, he could have bought Herrera, I'm sure 2-3M difference compared to what he spent on Fellaini won't make much difference, he consiously chose to spunk the money on Fellaini, instead of Herrera. While we will never know if Herrera can cut it, Moyes should know that Felainni will flop.

5. Again, how is this down to Moyes? The manager identifies the players and the relevant people at the club act. As it stands in this instance, was it not the fact that Madrid couldnt bring their chosen repalcement in time that meant it didnt go through?

He identifies unrealistic target, if only Gill was around, he'll told him to feck Off instead of going to Madrid with only his dick. How naive to think that Moyes is that clueless that he doesn't know how much he has to spend? and how naive it is to think that he genuinely thinks he can get Fabregas for 25M, and how naive it is for him to think that Fabregas would want to ditch Barca to play under him.

Not sure what your point is to be honest. A lot of people seem to have an axe to grind with Moyes and I'm not sure why. He's not been given the tools to do his job properly by the board. He has, as to be expected, made mistakes, tactically and otherwise - but he's in a new job, probably the hardest job in football, so that was always going to happen.

My point is, he dig everything on his own, and it shouldn't be used as excuses, instead it only shows how out of depth he is when he finally got the financial backing we all use as an excuse for his stagnating Everton.

He has been a given a title winning squad, Saha , Januzaj, and 30M to spend. I don't think he's not given the tools to do his job, probably not a lavish tool compared to Madrid, but surely he has been given the tools.

I'm sick of people peddling that it's hardest job, it is not. Getting us to dominate for 10 years on is hardest job, getting us 4th is not the hardest job, it is the minimum requirement. If he don't have the capacity to oversee things from a-z, he should let Rene manages some and focus on getting his tactics right.


Generally some bizarre attitudes on here. Some expecting a manager to come in and work with what the old manager left in terms of staff - seems to me like they just want Moyes to come in and try to be Fergie clone - which clearly isnt going to work and would likely end iin disaster.

Dude, manager come and manager go. Everywhere in the world nobody are expected to raze everything to ground and start with a fresh 11. SAF did that because he's been here for 26 years. When he first came, he make use of what is given to him.

So now we can't judge moyes till he fill bought and field 11 new starters? By your rationale, the only manager we can judge is SAF and Wenger. The rest are playing with someone else's squad.


Like I said, people have to accept that Fergie is gone - and he seems to have left at the right time, probably well aware of the shortcomings in the squad and the need to rebuild.

We all accept that, we just can't accept that he chooses an inept out of his depth win nothing won nothing against the top 4 david midtable moyes as his successor.

What some fans seem to want is a knee jerk reaction and see the manager sacked - as if its a given that another manager will come in and make this squad title challengers again. For me that isnt going to happen - too little quality, too many players edging over the hill, top players not adequately replaced over years - all adds up to where we are now - not a new manager coming in.

wake up. 6mths, out of the FA, beaten 4 times at homes, recently beaten by Sunder'fecking'land of all teams, playing continuous clueless football, this is not a knee jerk. We don't have the quality to win CL/EPL, but we do have the quality to beat the likes of Cardiff, Sunderland, Southampton, Swansea

I can understand if we can't seem to win against the top 4, but we're beaten right left center. You tell me if we're too shit to even match and win against Sunderland??


Moyes can't be judged yet - he needs time and the chance to bring in the players he needs to build a side. He may not prove to be the right man, but having given him the job the board needs to give him the opportunity.

Wake up and smell the coffee... the man's out of his depth, and the sooner we get rid of him the easier we mitigate the damage

If he can't show changes that he's trying to fix our predicament after 6 mths in charge (and 10 years playing against us), what makes you think he can do more than just steady the ship if given 5 years?