2-0 and New Zealand getting what they deserve in my opinion, really poor performance.
Sweden 3-0 ThailandScore predictions for those 2 games?
I’ll go with 5-0 to the US and 7-0 for Sweden.
Score predictions for those 2 games?
I’ll go with 5-0 to the US and 7-0 for Sweden.
Chile's goalkeeper, Christiane Endler (PSG) could have a really busy day, but she's good. They've got a few players playing pro/semipro football in Spain as well. I'd like to see them keep it below 5.
Thailand could be awful again, but I reckon Sweden will take pity. Not too much pity though, 4-0 maybe.
These new rule interpretations for handball are bullshit.
That goal has to stand if Brazil's own goal v Australia does (Neither should in my opinion).
interfering with an opponent by:
• preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
• challenging an opponent for the ball or
• clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or • making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
Yeah, I'm not sure why it was that different, however the rules now say on interfering:
So I guess the judgment call is around the definition of "challenging an opponent", and "attempting to play a ball"
Of course I think that whole definition of interfering has made a stupid rule change more stupid. Offside has to recognise the effect of an attacker's presence on a defender's behaviour - the defender isn't the one who should have to decide if the attacker is offside before acting. But eh, I guess we'll just have wait and see how it plays out and what the next rule clarification brings.
Kerr is deemed to be influencing but not interfering. It's a crazy interpretation in my opinion. As far as I'm concerned if the defender has to think about you then you are in interfering.
Not going to happen but if it did, they’d dominate alright.USA has a population of 350m and unlimited resources. Let’s be honest, this is probably how the men’s World Cup would be like if their best male athletes played soccer.
They have a huge population, correctUSA has a population of 350m and unlimited resources. Let’s be honest, this is probably how the men’s World Cup would be like if their best male athletes played soccer.
Be like 11 LukakusNot going to happen but if it did, they’d dominate alright.
Can you imagine guys like Kobe Bryant, Le Bron, Tom Brady, Mike Trout, etc all tearing it up in the WC![]()
USA has a population of 350m and unlimited resources. Let’s be honest, this is probably how the men’s World Cup would be like if their best male athletes played soccer.
USA has a population of 350m and unlimited resources. Let’s be honest, this is probably how the men’s World Cup would be like if their best male athletes played soccer.
So VAR cannot be used to show the foul was outside the box?
Most important is the culture and societal support behind it. Once you get to the high school level soccer seems to get far more support for the women when men/boys play their football/basketball/baseball and maybe things like LaCrosse. Same with Volleyball being looked upon as more of a women s sport. Changing that perception has been a loooong proces..i dont feel the MLS has accelerated that process as much as expected.USA has a population of 350m and unlimited resources. Let’s be honest, this is probably how the men’s World Cup would be like if their best male athletes played soccer.
I didn't mind the VAR in Russia last year. It feels really intrusive, and not in a good way, at this tournament. It's also been very "big-team friendly" in this tournament, which doesn't help.