vuc
First Team Serb
Well exactly.
But it's not just them.
Well exactly.
still fail to see your point.
Absolutely and I think the trouble here is that a lot of these kids are the by product of a generation that embodies a lot of those characteristics already.
I keep seeing people asking where the parents are in all this. Well they're sat at home watching X Factor, or down the pub spending their benefit money. They most likely don't care or if they do now, realise it's too late to do anything about it. I doubt a lot of them planned on having children for anything more than a state handout. It's a means to an end.
This is a generation of disenfranchised youth born from a generation of disenfranchised youth. It's a depressingly cyclical state of affairs.
But it's not just them.
Different time,different circumstances and just won't work.
And not everyone with lung cancer is a smoker.
Stupid comparison. The people who aren't smokers clearly don't want to get lung cancer. The people who get involved in riots want to get involved in them, irrespective of where they live.
Stupid comparison. The people who aren't smokers clearly don't want to get lung cancer. The people who get involved in riots want to get involved in them, irrespective of where they live.
All from Liverpool last night. Insane.
Innocent bystanders?
Thieving and looting across the country. London calls it 'an abomination', Birmingham calls it 'a disgrace', Liverpool calls it 'a Monday'.[Joke about how Liverpool is always like that]
Can't disagree with that.Its about both of those things and far more, as I asked last night, if its just social exclusion then why aren't all the kids from those areas involved?
Here's something radical and which I'll no doubt be lambasted for, but there is a responsibility on parents to raise their kids with values around respect, & community involvement, which seems to have been abandoned across society, its given way to view the only important attribute as being how much money you can accrue and how much stuff you can own. This has replaced any idea of gaining gratification or satisfaction from your relationships the people around you, be that in your family or in your community.
We dont teach kids how to interact anymore, or how to be good, we give them a gameboy or stick them in front of a TV to keep them quiet, they develop relationships with this 'stuff' as a result.
Raising kids with values which encourage them to be contributing members of society is the responsibility of parents, regardless of class divides or hardships.
What? There is a difference between me walking on the high street and being involved in the riot, and a rich kid donning a hoody and looting a shop actively participating in the riots.
Oh no you didn't...
The question isn't irrelevant, it relates directly to the differing standards of parenting and values instilled in kids who grow up facing the same issues.I answered this last night by saying there's no one, simple explanation. The question is irrelevant too. It has absolutely no bearing on whether or not social exclusion is a factor in the kids who do go out rioting.
It's the same flawed logic as saying smoking doesn't cause heart disease because not everyone who smokes will die of a heart attack
That's all well and good but meaningless to the single mum who's addicted to crack cocaine, or the kid who is forced to carry a knife from the age of eight to protect himself. Poverty and social exclusion fecks whole communities up. It's a bit glib to try and pretend that all their problems would melt away if only they were better parents.
but how do you know it wont work, 2 years having some discipline and respect drummed in to you can only be good , cant it?
You all seem to be missing the point that this can be about consumerism and social exclusion.
It's the former that drives these kids to break into shops rather than government building but the latter that creates hordes of disenfranchised youths who spend their life accustomed to lawlessness and violence and have nothing to lose by going on a rampage.
As I said a few posts back, consumerism is endemic amongst all strata of contemporary society but the kids running amok all live in the poorest, most run-down parts of London. Coincidence?
I'm not sure why this is being met with such little resistance by police? As Bradford showed us, yes, justice can be served, many years later, but that does nothing for the people out there now, scared their homes and business are going to be burned down, or looted. Surely more has to be done to protect the people that suffer the most from this? I know escalation is a serious fear, but at what point do they decide that the fear of escalation is not as big as the damage already being caused? It also doesn't look like a situation where the action is dying out, peoples attentions are wavering, or that they are going to stop, night by night it's increasing, and spreading, and I'm not so confident they should be allowed to do this without a significant response from the police.
Also, the media blackout on events happening outside Totteham, or an inability to accurately and constantly report what is happening in these areas, I know part of it is to stop the knock-on affect and give other rioters, anarchists and opportunists the chance to increase their numbers, but at the same time, should people not know what is happening in the areas they live in? People are desperate for information, for news on what is happening where, for themselves, their homes, businesses, families and friends.
Nothing wrong with discipline and respect.But i would rather see that from the parents and schools which have been hampered by politicians.
Nothing wrong with discipline and respect.But i would rather see that from the parents and schools which have been hampered by politicians.
Reports state that the police have been ordered to back off. Seriously?!?
Can you imagine the Australians doing that!!
We open our borders, give people homes and benefits, health care and a safe place to live, and THIS is our thanks...... will we ever learn![]()
Reports state that the police have been ordered to back off. Seriously?!?
Can you imagine the Australians doing that!!
We open our borders, give people homes and benefits, health care and a safe place to live, and THIS is our thanks...... will we ever learn![]()
To take the argument your making to its logical conclusion Pogue, we'd stop prosecuting criminals from socially disadvantaged areas and start treating them as victims of a class divide or social exclusion.
It's fecked up but it's a direct result of poverty and social exclusion.
London Riots: Shop-owners defend their businesses in east London - video | UK news | guardian.co.uk
Turkish shop owners get together to protect their shops, businesses and streets
They can be both criminals that need to be prosecuted, and victims of social exclusion and relative poverty.
Don't know if this has been shared. But that is low.