I don't mention Giggs. It's true we can rely on him being there too. Somehow I see Giggs more as a hybrid member of coaching staff, who can also play. Thinking long term Giggs can't be factored in. He will play a role next season but it'll be less than this season, and increasingly it'll be about his sheer experience and the example he sets. The fact is soon he won't be there and that should be addressed sooner rather than later.
The only way the young ones will learn the game is to play them. With a new "midfielder who has experience of playing midfield and is physically capable of playing every game", there won't be many opportunities left for them.
There's 76 starts for two midfielders in the league. Carrick and this new, required midfielder will start 70-80% of them, injuries permitting. That's 20-30% starts for Cleverley, Giggs, Anderson, Jones and whoever else is around.
And alternative/understudy to Carrick though makes sense. A player taking away games from the others does not.
Been said every year now for the last 5-6 seasons. in 09/10 he played 25 league games. 25 last season, and 19 so far this season. Averaging 30 over the course of his career.
But why is that a "only" for the two midfield places? If we had 5 strikers, would that be "only" five strikers?
A loan for Pogba I'd agree with though.
Cleverley and Anderson haven't even managed 25% of the starts combined this year (probably). Jones isn't a midfielder, anyone who thinks so is deluded. Giggs is 38, so what if he has limited opportunities? He's going to be limited more and more the old he gets anyway.
Not to mention possible injuries to Carrick and whomever, and maybe, just maybe, going back to a fecking 4-3-3 from time to time so that we can actually do well in Europe again.
there will still be PLENTY of game time for younger players.
And anyway, this club shouldn't be entirely about giving these youngsters games, Anderson has had 5 years for feck sake, I've practically given up relying on him to go and play over 30 games a season and be our star man by now. If making our midfield much better means limiting the likes of Anderson *slightly", then I don't really care.
One day it'll be true. There is no escaping age.
It wouldn't be quite random, it'd be age finally catching up with him. But no, I am not saying Giggs is past it, he has been fantastic this season. I'm just all about the orderly transition. I prefer to think about the inevitable now, plan for life after Giggs, even as we get a season or two more out of him. It'll be gradual, less appearances next season, maybe some the season after. But when he isn't there you have all your options bedded in.
The only way the young ones will learn the game is to play them. With a new "midfielder who has experience of playing midfield and is physically capable of playing every game", there won't be many opportunities left for them.
There's 76 starts for two midfielders in the league. Carrick and this new, required midfielder will start 70-80% of them, injuries permitting. That's 20-30% starts for Cleverley, Giggs, Anderson, Jones and whoever else is around.
And alternative/understudy to Carrick though makes sense. A player taking away games from the others does not.
But Petrucci was class, he must be a cert for the first team come next season (ahead of Pogba?)
That is a bold statement. I like the player but his injuries have really hindered his development, he is out of contract in the summer too. He isn't a 'cert' by a long way.
Luckily I was spared the Bilbao game.
Modric is a very good, little player. Costs too much.
And yes, if it came to it, I'd rather spend the money on Bale than Modric.
Plenty of games to go round: indeed. If we had another decent midfielder this season there might have been more games for everyone, seeing as we might have avoided crashing out of every cup we competed in, early.
But Petrucci was class, he must be a cert for the first team come next season (ahead of Pogba?)
Oi you fecktards, this is a thread about Pogba, not should we/shouldnt we buy a midfielder. I'm sure there are plenty of threads you can argue the toss about our midfield abundance/frailties, no?
What's wrong with all you spastics talking about what you are in here
https://www.redcafe.net/f6/we-dont-actually-need-midfielder-thread-306422/
And leaving the Pogba thread for what it's actually about?
I meant first team squad, obviously not first team...
Why don't you just let the Mods to deal with the thread, and you take care of your language.
Bit annoying coming into a thread about Pogba to see it be nothing about Pogba. I guess only certain people are allowed to complain about threads being taken of topic.
Midfield options are being discussed which kind of links with Pogba discussion.
Anyway, watched the reserves tonight. He played reasonably well, some great raking balls, and he has that technique of cutting across the ball on the half volley down to a fine art, pinged a couple out wide tonight using it.
Does anyone else though think he's at an in-between stage, where he's too good for the reserves but not quite ready for the first team? Maybe if he signs a contract, is still here next season and goes on the pre-season tour he'll make the step up, but I can't see him in the reserves next year, he's wasted there.
Anyway, watched the reserves tonight. He played reasonably well, some great raking balls, and he has that technique of cutting across the ball on the half volley down to a fine art, pinged a couple out wide tonight using it.
Does anyone else though think he's at an in-between stage, where he's too good for the reserves but not quite ready for the first team? Maybe if he signs a contract, is still here next season and goes on the pre-season tour he'll make the step up, but I can't see him in the reserves next year, he's wasted there.
Agreed, was saying the same thing, reminds me
Of about Danny welbeck.
He needs a championship style loan imo
If we don't expect Anderson and Cleverley to be less injured than this season, we should just get rid of them both.
Jones is whatever Sir Alex decides he will be.
Whether you have given up on players is irrelevant.
So would I. Even though we need a central midfielder more.
Modric is ever so slightly overrated, I think.
Does anyone else though think he's at an in-between stage, where he's too good for the reserves but not quite ready for the first team? Maybe if he signs a contract, is still here next season and goes on the pre-season tour he'll make the step up, but I can't see him in the reserves next year, he's wasted there.
Haven't seen enough of him, but that's what the problem was for Pique.
I don't see how, he's not even mentioned in 3/4 of the posts in the recent discussion, with most of it being about buying a midfielder or not, or whether Modric or Bale is the better signing, but hey, as you said, you're the mod so your call.
Anyway, watched the reserves tonight. He played reasonably well, some great raking balls, and he has that technique of cutting across the ball on the half volley down to a fine art, pinged a couple out wide tonight using it.
Does anyone else though think he's at an in-between stage, where he's too good for the reserves but not quite ready for the first team? Maybe if he signs a contract, is still here next season and goes on the pre-season tour he'll make the step up, but I can't see him in the reserves next year, he's wasted there.
He's not ready to be starting for the first-team, that's for damn sure.
As for being too good for the reserves, he was probably the most talented player on the pitch tonight but was completely anonymous for long stretches. Petrucci was much more influential. It's all very well him knowing he's the best player on the pitch but he needs to start proving it, week in, week out, if he wants to make that next step up.
He'll always have a languid style but he's good enough to really stamp his authority on a reserve team match, which is something he's only done very intermittently this season.
Also, being too good for the reserves doesn't always mean that you'll cut it at first team level at United. Chris Eagles was one that was always too good for the reserves but who couldn't make an impact at United.He's not ready to be starting for the first-team, that's for damn sure.
As for being too good for the reserves, he was probably the most talented player on the pitch tonight but was completely anonymous for long stretches. Petrucci was much more influential. It's all very well him knowing he's the best player on the pitch but he needs to start proving it, week in, week out, if he wants to make that next step up.
He'll always have a languid style but he's good enough to really stamp his authority on a reserve team match, which is something he's only done very intermittently this season.