Things this thread has taught me...
1) William Hill are stingy.
2) Never lend money to RedSky.
3) Never go for a drink with Revan.

Things this thread has taught me...
1) William Hill are stingy.
2) Never lend money to RedSky.
3) Never go for a drink with Revan.
We know roughly where teams will finish, though. I'm not saying it's easy, but you have teams that are almost nailed-on to finish top half and teams that are nailed-on to finish bottom half. If we know that four of Arsenal, City, Chelsea, United, Liverpool and Spurs will finish top four, and we can be almost certain that the two that don't make it, plus Southampton and Everton will finish top half, and that Newcastle, West Ham, Swansea and Stoke will finish above Bournemouth, Leicester and Watford, and so on.Assuming that we are sure that United, City, LFC, Spurs, Chelsea, Arsenal will finish in top 6 (and somehow we know the order they are going to finish there). Assuming that we know the 3 teams that will finish in bottom 3 (and somehow we know the order).
Chances of correctly predicting the teams which will finish 7th to 17th are 1/39916800
Obviously, it becomes far worse considering that we don't know the order of teams from first to sixth position and the order of relegated teams. So, assuming that we know only the six teams which will finish in top 6 and only which three teams will get relegated (very likely we know the first group but not the second group), chances of winning this are 1/172440576000. Assuming that we know only top 6 - but not bottom 3 - then chances of winning this are 1/62768369664000.
For comparison chances of winning a lotto 6 from 99 (which is the standard one in many countries) are 1/806781064320. In other words you have around 100 times more chances of winning that lotto compared to winning the William Hill Offer even if we are sure which six teams will finish in top 6.
Still, think that it is possible to win it (even having a lot of time and planning)?
Getting the closest guess prize is possible (by definition). Especially, if it has been done a lot of research and then being places 2500 tables there. I mean after all, it is limited to 1m tables and assuming that half of those tables are done fast and without much research, then getting the closest prize has chance of 0.5%. Small, but not neglible. Still, very small chance for an investment of 5000 pounds.We know roughly where teams will finish, though. I'm not saying it's easy, but you have teams that are almost nailed-on to finish top half and teams that are nailed-on to finish bottom half. If we know that four of Arsenal, City, Chelsea, United, Liverpool and Spurs will finish top four, and we can be almost certain that the two that don't make it, plus Southampton and Everton will finish top half, and that Newcastle, West Ham, Swansea and Stoke will finish above Bournemouth, Leicester and Watford, and so on.
We can make a lot of qualified guesses that slash the odds a lot in our favour. You'd still need a shitload of guesses to be nailed-on to win, of course, but if a group of 10 people submits 2500 different tables using valid assumptions based on team level, surely one of those 2500 tables would at least be in the running for one of the £100k closest guess prizes.
Things this thread has taught me...
1) William Hill are stingy.
2) Never lend money to RedSky.
3) Never go for a drink with Revan.
It's actually a 50 million total prize fund. This will be split between anybody who gets it right. It's unlikely anybody will so it probably won't be claimed. Especially as they are restricting it to 1 million entries.
I am liking this game.Are they really? At £2 per entry?
So if, by some miracle, someone does accurately guess the table.. they're setting themselves up for a potential £48million loss? They're clearly confident..
I am liking this game.
Assuming that we know top 6 and bottom 3 (only the teams, not the order), and assuming that there are 1m tickets (no duplicates), chances that one of the tickets will win are 1/172440. Still, extremely small.
I don't really get why they limited to 1m entries though. Even if more than one ticket won, the 50m prize would be shared, so I gues that it would have benefitted them to allow more entries. Even 10m entries (knowing top 6 and bottom 3, no duplicates) would have probability of winning only at 1/17244 but then the revenue generated would be 20m instead of 2m, and so the potential loss would be 30m instead of 48m.
True, but in those circumstances you just hold your hands up and go "unlucky".
There'd be no probability whatsoever in predicting everything. Probably around 1 in 85472184781274381274807210421894120849032751865073215071248721094829017521395639710512098412903812904912742198057182479.So this is just predicting the positions? They dont want the full exact table. I.e goals for against, wins draws losses ect. Just purely who will occupy positions 1-20?
Worth 2 quid of anyones brass.
They seem to have operating income of around £350m so £50m would be significant money for them.They're clearly banking on nobody getting it right. I'm aware of the odds and I'm not stupid.. but I really think this is a dangerous move for William Hill. It only takes one lucky ticket for them to be in trouble. Then again, it also only takes one anomaly (a team like Newcastle slipping to the relegation zone, for example) before the majority of tickets are dead in the water.
If the league table is fairly 'as you'd expect', then they could be in trouble. Is the gamble worth £48million for them as a company? I'd say no.
They seem to have operating income of around £350m so £50m would be significant money for them.
And it's probably going to cost less than £1m they will get in entry stakes. Profit made + popularity gained.That's what's insurance is for. Given the odds of landing an exact ticket are extremely, extremely small, it won't be hard to get insurance on it.
Thank me later.
- Chelsea
- Arsenal
- City
- United
- Liverpool
- Spurs
- Everton
- Southampton
- Stoke
- Swansea
- Palace
- Newcastle
- Aston Villa
- West Brom
- West Ham
- Watford
- Bournemouth
- Sunderland
- Leicester
- Norwich
I know, I've already changed my mind on one or two. Any from 9-12 could be changed around for me and I'd probably put Villa down to 15th or 16th, 13th is probably too high for them.Its not easy as it looks, I personally wouldnt have Everton anywhere near 7th, not with Martinez in charge, too inconsistent.
I also think West Brom will do better than Villa, Newcastle and Everton.
1. Chelsea
2. United
3. Arsenal
4. City
5. Liverpool
6. Spurs
7. Swansea
8. Southampton
9. Everton
10. West Brom
11. West Ham
12. Aston Villa
13. Stoke
14. Crystal Palace
15. Newcastle
16. Leicester
17. Bournemouth
18. Sunderland
19. Watford
20. Norwich
It's hard. You could easily swap round all the teams from 10-15th, and anything could happen from 2-5th. Chelsea could randomly be shit, Van Gaal's philosophy might prove to be worthwhile as we win the treble, and Everton could be good again.
Who fecking knows! Very hard to predict. It'll probably be won by some extremely knowledgeable football analyst.
There are exactly 2432902008176640000 possible combinations.
Imagine if you got it almost correct but some fecker of a team loses on the final day and ruins everything.
Imagine if you got it almost correct but some fecker of a team loses on the final day and ruins everything.
And imagine if it's us resting players because we've got nothing to play for.
Possible outcomes ≠ Realistic outcomes, of course.
We probably know 6 of the top 7, and know that Liverpool/Tottenham will not win the league. So we also know the top 4, or at least have a good idea.
There are probably 5 teams that look likely to go down - IMO Norwich, Bournemouth, Leicester, Watford and Sunderland.
This narrows it down hugely, and of course the middle section is going to be tough. But I think if you have the time/knowledge you can make a real educated guess.
So basically you're narrowing it down to this being something difficult?
I did this.
If I win £50m I'm buying redcafe.
Ah feck it's limited to the UK? I had the winning order!I tried to sign up but they won't let me because I am in denmark![]()
The entire city?![]()
And the people. Would that include Cheryl Cole?The club.
And the people. Would that include Cheryl Cole?