Dele Alli is England's best young midfielder playing in Turkey

You've missed the point, it was that Alli has done as much as Pogba had at the age of 19. Not that Pogba has done more in his overall career, given he's three years older. Alli also plays much further forward than Pogba so he's never going to "dominate" midfields as Pogba does, some people have even been questioning if he's even a midfielder after the Chelsea game.
I'm aware of the positions they play. The original point was that Alli had sown moe potential than Pogba. Just because Pogba wasn't playing in the PL doesn't mean he showed less potential.
 
The debate wasn't just that by any means.

Whether Nani was a better player or not was a subjective matter. I would argue not. On here however, it was treated by the majority of the board as if someone was trying to claim Chris brunt is a better player than Ronaldo.

It was also said by quite a few that Nani had already reached a higher level that season than Bales ceiling which obviously has turned out to be.... Incorrect.

As for your next question, the majority of those were by no means minority views.

Which again, as I said, it fair enough. You're hardly going to go on a man utd forum and expect the posters to think that Spurs players are better than the majority of theirs or anything like that.

But I think it's slightly disingenuous to say that he has merely picked out one or two posters comments. Regardless of whether the method he's then decided to reply has been the correct one or not.

I also don't think the times when these things were being argued about the opinions presented by Glaston as 'stupid' actually were quite so bad.

Rafael was a better RB than Walker at that time; the discussion was whether he was better than Zabaleta or not, and that wasn't just on here.
Valancia is (this season) a better RB than Walker too, and at the time when Shaw was being heralded as a better LB than Rose it was at a time when it was a lot closer than it is now.
And Nani probably was a better player at the time than Bale too.

I think Glaston's problem is that he gets carried away, as he's doing now, and starts to hype clearly very talented players with lots of potential as if they were the finished article about a season or two early. Which often leads him to be right, in a sense, that the players he's talking about are good players, but wrong about whatever he was actually arguing about at the time.

Thats his real problem really. No one has any issue with the suggestion Alli is a good young player enjoying a very good start to his career with the potential to be even better, but - even though Glaston acts like thats all he's saying - the nitty gritty of it is that he actually goes on to talk about them (and Rose, Walker, Kane, Bale etc...) as if they've already achieved it.

Thats why he gets so much flack.
 
At this stage I don't think it matters what he says.

Just a bunch of United fans stomping their feet because a Spurs fan rates his own. It's OK to think he's wrong on Alli vs Pogba but still agree with some of his points.

Indeed. "Stomping their feet" is a perfect description.
 
Glaston's main crime is being positive and optimistic about a club most people feel belong mid table. How he has had the nerve to suggest that a club such as Spurs may have better players or ability to challenge United I will never understand. Even now most people on this forum seem to debate when Pochettino and ' insert any player too good for spurs' here will leave the club. Of course this can rub some spurs supporters the wrong way, and when they then respond aggressively the United posters do the same. I'm not saying most United supporters do this, but any thread I read about Spurs you see it frequently.

Regarding Alli. I think he is a great talent and might become an absolutely top player. Pogba is further down in development and is obviously a fantastic and complete midfielder. Not going to compare the two since it is rather pointless.
 
I also don't think the times when these things were being argued about the opinions presented by Glaston as 'stupid' actually were quite so bad.

Rafael was a better RB than Walker at that time; the discussion was whether he was better than Zabaleta or not, and that wasn't just on here.
Valancia is (this season) a better RB than Walker too, and at the time when Shaw was being heralded as a better LB than Rose it was at a time when it was a lot closer than it is now.
And Nani probably was a better player at the time than Bale too.

I think Glaston's problem is that he gets carried away, as he's doing now, and starts to hype clearly very talented players with lots of potential as if they were the finished article about a season or two early. Which often leads him to be right, in a sense, that the players he's talking about are good players, but wrong about whatever he was actually arguing about at the time.

Thats his real problem really. No one has any issue with the suggestion Alli is a good young player enjoying a very good start to his career with the potential to be even better, but - even though Glaston acts like thats all he's saying - the nitty gritty of it is that he actually goes on to talk about them (and Rose, Walker, Kane, Bale etc...) as if they've already achieved it.

Thats why he gets so much flack.

Like I said, things like this are totally subjective. For example, I wouldn't even have classed Valencia and Walker as a debate this season but you not only think it's a debate but that Valencia is better. Frankly, I'm not really going to bother arguing that in any great length.

Similarly, Shaw was being talked up as one of the best left backs in the world after a few decent performances and rose derided as being nowhere near his talent level. To suggest otherwise on here was to be deemed a moron effectively.

Which again, is fair enough. I'm not here to try to Convince thousands of Man utd fans that our players are better than theirs.

I'm not trying to defend him. I'm saying that the response to him us disproportionate and boring and it ruins threads. That people jump on various bandwagons (ie he disappears after Spurs lose). And that even when he argues logical things that fans of other clubs may get away with, he is ridiculed as being delusional (see points above).

I just don't see the point and it detracts from the point of this being a football forum.

I've said that the way he responds to things I'd also not really correct at times either.
 
Maybe. But there's no need to be like him.
@Grinner etc are other teams fans. @Kentonio is another one.
Glaston tries to rub everyone the wrong way.

I'm another one of what? Apart from Liverpool fans and occasionally the Spurs lads when they're being particularly annoying I don't think I ever really go on a wind up. I try and respect the fact this is a United forum, and that it's pretty decent allowing us oppo fans to post so openly here.
 
Like I said, things like this are totally subjective. For example, I wouldn't even have classed Valencia and Walker as a debate this season but you not only think it's a debate but that Valencia is better. Frankly, I'm not really going to bother arguing that in any great length.

Similarly, Shaw was being talked up as one of the best left backs in the world after a few decent performances and rose derided as being nowhere near his talent level. To suggest otherwise on here was to be deemed a moron effectively.

Which again, is fair enough. I'm not here to try to Convince thousands of Man utd fans that our players are better than theirs.

I'm not trying to defend him. I'm saying that the response to him us disproportionate and boring and it ruins threads. That people jump on various bandwagons (ie he disappears after Spurs lose). And that even when he argues logical things that fans of other clubs may get away with, he is ridiculed as being delusional (see points above).

I just don't see the point and it detracts from the point of this being a football forum.

I've said that the way he responds to things I'd also not really correct at times either.

Ultimately its an issue of watching more of your own team than any other which I expect explains our difference of opinion on Valencia/Walker (I'm far from a Valencia fan btw, and have spent most of the last two years thinking he's not good enough, but I struggle to think of how he can have been better than he has this season; he's been excellent) and many others.

But I think even then, what really rubs people up the wrong way about Glaston is, despite what he professes to have been arguing, he comes across as saying 'my club is great; your club is shit' regardless of how rational or irrational the original post is and, as this post is proof of, shifts the goalposts and changes whats important when it suits him.

I think the fact that even the Liverpool fans tend to get less shit than Glaston does speaks volumes.
 
??? I'm a fan of Alli but this is very confusing? Are you suggesting Pogba hasn't achieved more than Alli in his 3 extra years?

4 league titles, 2 cups, Champions League final, Euro 2016 final, U20 World Cup, UEFA Team of the Year, FifPro World XI, Golden Boy.

Vs

League One Runner Up and PFA Team of the Year

No that's not what I said at all? The original point that Glaston made was that Alli at the age of 19, had shown as much as Pogba had at the same age. Prodigal then said that Pogba has been dominating midfields his entire career. So I'm saying that the point was that they had shown similar potential at the same age, and that Pogba's extra three years (and all the achievements that he's had during that time) are not relevant - to that specific point.
 
No that's not what I said at all? The original point that Glaston made was that Alli at the age of 19, had shown as much as Pogba had at the same age. Prodigal then said that Pogba has been dominating midfields his entire career. So I'm saying that the point was that they had shown similar potential at the same age, and that Pogba's extra three years (and all the achievements that he's had during that time) are not relevant - to that specific point.

Apologies I misread it. I thought you were making the point you did make and then as an aside, saying "Not that he's done much more anyway". My mistake!
 
This is one of the vaguer statements I've read on this forum. Is this based on observing Alli losing his temper now and again, or celebrating a goal more vociferously than Pogba? I'm not saying you're incorrect but what exactly did you see to make you think this? There must have been specific observations on specific occasions which led you to this conclusion?

I haven't seen anywhere near as much of Alli as I have of Pogba. I've often seen Pogba driving United on, dominating the midfield and instigating wave after wave of
Where exactly would he play ?


Yes, because stating a different opinion is considered trolling now :rolleyes:

I'd find somewhere for him, you can never have too many good players. I'm sure he could play the more advanced role in a midfield 3.
 
Pogba was the talk of world football at 20 years old. Making Alli out to be ahead of the Pogba curb at the same age is ridiculous.
Alli is Fowler, Collymore or Ian Wright. Top names that are only top names in the bubble that is the Premiership. Blood and thunder and all box play.
Pogba is a Zidane with one season scoring over 10 goals in his career. An Iniesta type. The game runs through him that can't be explained through stats.
He's the world class player that is lauded at Barca or Madrid while the English league bow at the feet of David Silva or KDB.
That's how big his signing is. Pogba v Alli is Neymar v Hazard.
There's simply a level between excellent and elite.
This post looks a bit silly after today. Zidane and Iniesta wouldn't struggle to get the better of a midfield of Henderson and Can. Yeah it's one game, people are allowed off days, but most of the hype for Pogba's performances this season have come from dominating against the likes of Hull.
 
I also don't think the times when these things were being argued about the opinions presented by Glaston as 'stupid' actually were quite so bad.

Rafael was a better RB than Walker at that time; the discussion was whether he was better than Zabaleta or not, and that wasn't just on here.
Valancia is (this season) a better RB than Walker too, and at the time when Shaw was being heralded as a better LB than Rose it was at a time when it was a lot closer than it is now.
And Nani probably was a better player at the time than Bale too.

I think Glaston's problem is that he gets carried away, as he's doing now, and starts to hype clearly very talented players with lots of potential as if they were the finished article about a season or two early. Which often leads him to be right, in a sense, that the players he's talking about are good players, but wrong about whatever he was actually arguing about at the time.

Thats his real problem really. No one has any issue with the suggestion Alli is a good young player enjoying a very good start to his career with the potential to be even better, but - even though Glaston acts like thats all he's saying - the nitty gritty of it is that he actually goes on to talk about them (and Rose, Walker, Kane, Bale etc...) as if they've already achieved it.

Thats why he gets so much flack.
Wait.

How is Valencia better than Walker?

Walker has created more chances than any other defender in the entire league. He's the top of the heap of all of them.

He's also a member of the best defense in the league and I've got to say he's been one of our most consistent performers and he's really taken a further step this season.
 
Wait.

How is Valencia better than Walker?

Walker has created more chances than any other defender in the entire league. He's the top of the heap of all of them.

He's also a member of the best defense in the league and I've got to say he's been one of our most consistent performers and he's really taken a further step this season.

Our FB/WB's have been a revelation so far this season, the improvement in these guys under Pochettino is incredible.
 
Wait.

How is Valencia better than Walker?

Walker has created more chances than any other defender in the entire league. He's the top of the heap of all of them.

He's also a member of the best defense in the league and I've got to say he's been one of our most consistent performers and he's really taken a further step this season.

Because Valencia has been incredible too. Basically a one man right hand side for us at times. I'll grant you that Walker's been better going forward (its still bizarrely a weakness of Valencia's game in the final third) but I'd have Valencia anywhere else on the pitch.

The stats would back that up too if we're going to go down that route.
 
Because Valencia has been incredible too. Basically a one man right hand side for us at times. I'll grant you that Walker's been better going forward (its still bizarrely a weakness of Valencia's game in the final third) but I'd have Valencia anywhere else on the pitch.

The stats would back that up too if we're going to go down that route.

I think you seriously underestimate how well Walker has played this season, and first and foremost he's a defender operating in currently the best defence over the last 18 months.
 
I think you seriously underestimate how well Walker has played this season, and first and foremost he's a defender operating in currently the best defence over the last 18 months.

And you with Valencia too which is somewhat the point.
 
Because Valencia has been incredible too. Basically a one man right hand side for us at times. I'll grant you that Walker's been better going forward (its still bizarrely a weakness of Valencia's game in the final third) but I'd have Valencia anywhere else on the pitch.

The stats would back that up too if we're going to go down that route.
So which are the stats that back it up? I'm curious just from a devil's advocate point of view. If it's tackles and interceptions though that's a terribly flawed argument.
 
Our English scouts needs a kick up their arse for letting this one slip. Him about single handedly ripping us a new one when we played MK Dons should be evidence enough.
 
Our English scouts needs a kick up their arse for letting this one slip. Him about single handedly ripping us a new one when we played MK Dons should be evidence enough.

Exactly my thinking. Unbelievable how we didn't sign him immediately after the game. It was clear as day he was the best player on the pitch. I'm guessing even Spurs signed him on the back of that. :lol:

Five f*cking million. You can't buy Bebe with that.
 
Exactly my thinking. Unbelievable how we didn't sign him immediately after the game. It was clear as day he was the best player on the pitch. I'm guessing even Spurs signed him on the back of that. :lol:

Five f*cking million. You can't buy Bebe with that.

Apparently we had known about him from the age of 14 - although I've no doubt many other clubs were aware of him as well.
 
Apparently we had known about him from the age of 14 - although I've no doubt many other clubs were aware of him as well.

I think we need to steal a few of your scouts and negotiating team. For a total under £100 million they have bought Lloris (£10 million), Carrick (£3.5 million), Modric (£16.5 million), Berbatov (£10 million), Bale (£5 million), Dembele (£15 million), Alderweireld (£11.5 million), Danny Rose (£1 million), Eriksen (£11 million) Kyle Walker + Naughton (£9 million) and of course Alli for £5 million. All tremendous business.
 
I think we need to steal a few of your scouts and negotiating team. For a total under £100 million they have bought Lloris (£10 million), Carrick (£3.5 million), Modric (£16.5 million), Berbatov (£10 million), Bale (£5 million), Dembele (£15 million), Alderweireld (£11.5 million), Danny Rose (£1 million), Eriksen (£11 million) Kyle Walker + Naughton (£9 million) and of course Alli for £5 million. All tremendous business.

That is one thing as a club we seem to get right - we have had great recruitment of players at relatively small prices. Mind you, we have had a lot of luck in the way some of them have developed (that and some very good coaching) - not all of them have worked out but usually we still sell at a profit (mostly). We don't have the biggest budget for wages or transfer fees so we have to look for the best deals we can on players we believe can be developed into the players we need rather than buying the finished article (mostly).

I know the general feeling was that we wasted the Bale money but we did get Eriksen and Lamela who have both proved to be good signings (Eriksen in particular obviously) and we still managed to get a lot of the money back when we sold the rest - though quite a few duds in there - Soldado, Paulinho, Vlad and Capoue all pretty much disasters.
 
I think we need to steal a few of your scouts and negotiating team. For a total under £100 million they have bought Lloris (£10 million), Carrick (£3.5 million), Modric (£16.5 million), Berbatov (£10 million), Bale (£5 million), Dembele (£15 million), Alderweireld (£11.5 million), Danny Rose (£1 million), Eriksen (£11 million) Kyle Walker + Naughton (£9 million) and of course Alli for £5 million. All tremendous business.

Agree with this. We've really missed the boat on a few. I've said a few times our scouting has been average over the last 7 years or so.

Though I wouldn't count Walker in that. As well as he's currently playing the guys been terrible at times over the years.
 
Agree with this. We've really missed the boat on a few. I've said a few times our scouting has been average over the last 7 years or so.

Though I wouldn't count Walker in that. As well as he's currently playing the guys been terrible at times over the years.

Walker proves that a player shouldnt be totally written off if they are very inconsistent throughout the start of their career. He used to frustrate the hell out of me and he never seemed to progress much mainly because he seemed to just rely on his pace to get him out of trouble rather than develop his game. He has been in fantastic form for the last 2 years though, since Poch has been here he must have done wonders with him on the training ground because he has finally become a very consistent player both in attack and defense. Took him many seasons to get there though.
 
Walker proves that a player shouldnt be totally written off if they are very inconsistent throughout the start of their career. He used to frustrate the hell out of me and he never seemed to progress much mainly because he seemed to just rely on his pace to get him out of trouble rather than develop his game. He has been in fantastic form for the last 2 years though, since Poch has been here he must have done wonders with him on the training ground because he has finally become a very consistent player both in attack and defense. Took him many seasons to get there though.

Yeah true but you can only wait so long. I don't think a club with the expectations of United could have indulged him for that long.
 
Yeah true but you can only wait so long. I don't think a club with the expectations of United could have indulged him for that long.

That's true - Spurs kinda have to give players time and try to develop them but I cant see the same thing happening at Utd although Utd do have a history of spending big therefore expecting more earlier I guess. Mind you, the more success Spurs have the more pressure there will be on players to play well earlier - as we are seeing with Janssen I think so things may change.
 
Id have to look it up but im pretty sure he was signed then allowed to continue on for a season.

We played MK Dons at the end of August 2014, he was signed in Feb 2015 (winter transfer deadline day).

They literally signed him at the next available opportunity.
 
When we signed him there was a bit of a buzz about him but as soon as he started training with the team from what I have heard they were absolutely stunned at how good he was - much, much better than they had anticipated and he was accelerated into the first team as a result.