The "England have had it easy" narrative

For sure. I’ve been genuinely taken aback by the sensitivity of you lot. As though you’re morally obliged to support England if you support an English team, or holding an opinion that England have had a decent run of fixtures makes you bitter. It’s such bizarre behaviour I’m honestly struggling to work out which posts are serious and which posts are a parody. Yours was a parody, right?

Yes.
 
What does this even mean?!?

The internet doesn't end with the caf. Go and look at thr comments sections of any article about enfland and their are loads of peoplr moaning about how england would have gone out if thry'd played a good team. Its great.
 
Relatively easy. But yes without the pedantry call it what you like, i think many non england fans do see the way some england fans are acting as pretty typical. Not everybody is bitter or anti england for making an observstion on a very strsightforward path, that would absolutely be made were it spain, Argentina etc making the same route. Way too defensive and often hypocritical attitudes. Will england fans be happy if their route is ignored or if all neutrals pretend it wasnt a fantastic fall of the draw
Dude you have a chip on your shoulder about "England fans". Chill out.
 
Perhaps someone claiming England haven't had an easy route could explain what exactly an easy route would look like. Or are we supposed to think that there is no such thing as an easy route and all draws are exactly as lucky as each other?

England have clearly had an easier route than we could have had. For example, being on the other side of the draw in this world cup, no doubt.

However, I think people are making two weird comments:

-It is easy. The teams we've faced have all deserved to be here. They've won their qualifiers, they've gotten through their groups and were all decent teams. Tunisia are one of the better African teams and Panama managed to keep out the apparently infinitely better, now suddenly elite Belgium side, for the first half. Not to mention that England have traditionally struggled against such teams anyway, even with the apparent golden generation.

-The teams we've faced have been there on merit. This side of the draw didn't magically appear like this. Germany were supposed to lie in wait in the quarters, Spain/ Portugal in the semis. We're apparently supposed to have been terrified to have faced Italy, Netherlands, Argentina, Spain.

We've faced the team that knocked out Italy and the Netherlands. They've knocked out Germany too, who were so shit this world cup thay they finished bottom of their group. What is funny is that if we had faced Netherlands or Italy in the QF, instead of Sweden and won, people probably wouldn't be saying this. And yet none of them were good enough to get past the apparently championship level side we faced in the QF. You're looking at name and history, rather than actual performances.

We're also about to face the team that knocked out both Spain (who had no cutting edge whatsoever and struggled in their group) and the hosts. Already I'm seeing people torn between saying Croatia are great and will finally beat us or saying they're also crap and we should be beating such a small nation.

Tldr

We've had a relatively easier route to the SF but people are also focusing way too much on names and not the actual performances of the supposed heavyweight teams that we should have apparently feared like Germany, Italy, Argentina, Spain, Netherlands etc, none of whom have shown any reason to be in this stage of this world cup.
 
Watching England play an utterly toothless Sweden team in the world cup quarter final, just after playing A Colombia team missing their world class player, Tunisia, Panama and Belgium's reserves? its hard to not think its an extremely fortuitous path to the final. Especially while quality teams continue to knock each other out on the in of the other bracket
 
Colombia are decent - around the level of a team you'd expect to meet in R16, and it came down to penalties
But Sweden - if they were an English club side they'd be a good Championship side, I can't recall anyone talking them up pre-tournament
Croatia are also a decent team and that will be a big test for England but, at semi-final stage you'd usually be expecting to meet one of the elite sides

After the Group stage, its been like watching two different tournaments - one with lots of top teams and high quality games, and the other a bunch of indifferent teams in rather scrappy matches. Weird

Its like the PDC and the BDO darts championships being played at the same time - and when we get to the final the winners of both will play each other, Michael Van Gerwyn vs Martin Wolfie Adams

Colombia also didnt have their best player. Remove Kane from this england team and they would have lost aswell.
 
Watching England play an utterly toothless Sweden team in the world cup quarter final, just after playing A Colombia team missing their world class player, Tunisia, Panama and Belgium's reserves? its hard to not think its an extremely fortuitous path to the final. Especially while quality teams continue to knock each other out on the other side of the bracket

Why didn't the heavyweights of Italy, Netherlands or Germany manage to do anything against the toothless Swedish team?
 
I might have to turn the volume down during EPL matches if England win, otherwise I'l have to bear the 'the best national team in the world' nonsense from the commentators :nervous:

Will Baddiel and Skinner release a new song if England win?

Why didn't the heavyweights of Italy, Netherlands or Germany manage to do anything against the toothless Swedish team?

Germany beat them :D
 
Why didn't the heavyweights of Italy, Netherlands or Germany manage to do anything against the toothless Swedish team?


Good question, Sweden certainly looked out of their depth and probably should have lost 4-0 to England. Easy to see why Italy and Holland didn't quality
 
I might have to turn the volume down during EPL matches if England win, otherwise I'l have to bear the 'the best national team in the world' nonsense from the commentators :nervous:

Will Baddiel and Skinner release a new song if England win?



Germany beat them :D

They did....on their way to finishing bottom of a group also containing Mexico and South Korea ;)
 
The irony is that the same people that say our route has been easy are the ones predicting we will lose very game. They obviously feel we are playing superior teams but our path is easy! Personally just enjoying the most competitive world cup ever with the most surprises. I didn't want Wales to get to the final of the Euro's and fully understand others outside England wanting us to fail. It's all good.
 
Dude you have a chip on your shoulder about "England fans". Chill out.

No sorry, i really dont. At least no moreso than any football fan has regarding any other set of fans. I feel im pretty neutral about it all in fact, you can read my posts if in doubt otherwise maybe you need to relax a little?
 
This is one of those threads where both sides of the "debate" come away looking like assholes.
 
Are they really though?

Yes. There were so many people claiming Colombia were a dangerous side and that England were in for a very tough test. Those same people claimed that Sweden were also a good side and that the match could go either way - likely to be a goal on it. Now they are poor teams because England have beaten them. The same will happen with Croatia. If England win, Croatia won’t be as good as they were before the match. Tunes will change.
 
No sorry, i really dont. At least no moreso than any football fan has regarding any other set of fans. I feel im pretty neutral about it all in fact, you can read my posts if in doubt otherwise maybe you need to relax a little?
You seem intent on telling England fans how they ought to think and behave in light of being in the semis with an easier route than we could have. Comes across as preachy and sanctimonious.
 
Is this really a topic for conversation? I mean seriously England are in their first semi final since 1990 (?) who cares how they got there? If England were serial winners then I can understand the criticism but as they're not bore off
 
Who cares, you guys made it to semi finals, enjoy the ride.
 
You ranking Tunisia and Panama as the worst teams from their pots doesn't necessarily make it true though.

Tunisia were the highest ranked African side going into the tournament, ahead of Senegal and Egypt that were also in Pot 3. I'm also not sure what Egypt, who lost every game, including their game against Saudi Arabia, showed to prove that they were better than Tunisia, or what winless Iceland and Costa Rica proved either. Heading into the World Cup Tunisia beat both Iran and Costa Rica, also in Pot 3, drew with Portugal, and only lost 1-0 to Spain.

Panama also qualified by finishing two places ahead of the US, and while I'll give you that they weren't great, it's not as if the pairing of Tunisia and Panama is any weaker than Morocco and Iran, or Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

This is the exact issue I have. People are rating teams based on a gut-feeling of how good they are "on paper" and not based on their performances and results in the build up to, and in the tournament.



Again, you can't just decide that England had the easiest of the Pot 3 and Pot 4 teams and present it as fact, when one was ranked higher than two of the teams from the same confederation, and beat two others in the build to the tournament. Panama there's an argument for, but as I said, that pairing is no worse than some of the Pot 3 and 4 pairings we saw.

England couldn't have had a group containing Belgium, Serbia and Egypt because only two UEFA nations can be drawn in the same group. Egypt didn't prove themselves better than Tunisia at all, so that's a weird substitution to make, and the other alternatives from that Pot were Costa Rica, Senegal, and Iran, two of which Tunisia beat in the build up and the other they were ranked ahead of. There were obviously better teams than Panama in Pot 4, but England would be heavy favourites against any of them.



I'm not sure what point you're making here.

England were a Pot 2 team, ranked 12th by Fifa. They've played 13th ranked Colombia and 25th ranked Sweden so far, and are guaranteed to face either 5th ranked Belgium or 7th ranked France should they reach the final.

Croatia were also a Pot 2 team, ranked 18th by Fifa. They've played 19th ranked Denmark and 65th ranked Russia so far, and are guaranteed to face either 5th ranked Belgium or 7th ranked France should they reach the final.

Belgium were a Pot 1 team, ranked 5th by Fifa. They've played 44th ranked Japan and 2nd ranked Brazil, and are guaranteed to face 12th ranked England or 18th ranked Croatia should they reach the final.

France were a Pot 1 team, ranked 7th by Fifa. They've played 4th ranked Argentina and 17th ranked Uruguay, and are guaranteed to face 12th ranked England or 18th ranked Croatia.

With every possible final draw from these semi-final teams, Croatia and France would play two teams ranked ahead of them should they get there (England/France and Argentina/Belgium respectively), and England and Belgium one team (Belgium and Brazil respectively).

There were 10 teams in the competition ranked higher than England. The one they could have met in the first knockout round ended up bottom of their group, and one of the two they could have met in the quarter final also finished bottom of their group, with the other being in the other half of the draw. Two of the three that England could have met in the semi-final were eliminated in the first knockout round, one by the lowest ranked team in the entire competition, the other by England's actual quarter-final opponents, and the other ended up in the other half of the draw after finishing second in their group, and were also eliminated in the first knockout round.

England could have theoretically played Poland in the first knockout round and Switzerland in the quarter final, two teams ranked ahead of them. I'm not convinced that would have prevented your criticism of England's apparent "easy" route.

Im not doing that, im making that opinion on how transparently diabolical both of those sides were at the tournament itself. Panama were so bad and expected so little a consolation in a 6-1 beating almost caused a national holiday. Tunisia looked like a pub side against belgium then the 2 played eachother in a comically bad game. They were abysmal sides and a guaranteed 6 points for any above average team.

I apologise for the careless hypothetical about the group but the point remains, it was as easy a group as was possible especially when it became clear that losing to belgium was a beneficial result.

On a separate issue id rather not get in to, i personally have never seen a fan argue the merit of the fifa ranking system, a ferociously maligned system, until now. It was clear to see these teams were out of their depth at the world cup. Add in saudi arabia and egypt without salah and that's about it. 16 teams have to go out in the group it doesnt mean they were bad. I also strongly disagree with your assertion about Iran and Morocco. Both performed really well at this tournament and were very unlucky to go out of a very tough group

I think when you have made a thread suggesting, arguing in fact, that England haven't had an easy run, you have to expect some blow back not unanimous agreement. Peope aren't necessarily trying to detract from your team, its just a talking point at the minute and so it should be- i would argue that they may go into a world cup final with all of us unsure of how good or bad they are - purely because most would expect them to beat the three teams they have beaten. Its an interesting scenario and not a vendetta
 
Last edited:
Yes. There were so many people claiming Colombia were a dangerous side and that England were in for a very tough test. Those same people claimed that Sweden were also a good side and that the match could go either way - likely to be a goal on it. Now they are poor teams because England have beaten them. The same will happen with Croatia. If England win, Croatia won’t be as good as they were before the match. Tunes will change.
It comes across as sad and bitter how the goalposts of criticism are shifting.

After the group stage, England supporters who implied that we might have an easier route to the semis were labelled arrogant. Now the achievement of reaching a semi-final is belittled because it was "easy".

I, for one, am just happy that we didn't embarrass ourselves as usual. Last Euros we lost to Iceland. The WC before that we finished bottom of our group. Just goes to show there is truly no such thing as an 'easy' match for England. And that's usually because we are rubbish! Makes a nice change that we are not a national embarrassment.
 
We've suddenly become a team who can seemingly win "easy" games instead of making a total mess of it and embarrassing ourselves. I'll take that.
 
By the way, France had it fairly easy in 98.
 
Is this really a topic for conversation? I mean seriously England are in their first semi final since 1990 (?) who cares how they got there? If England were serial winners then I can understand the criticism but as they're not bore off
Exactly! We've set the bar so low that most of us are still in disbelief/shock that we're in a bleeding World cup semi final.

I'm going to have a very unproductive 3 days at work.
 
Yes. There were so many people claiming Colombia were a dangerous side and that England were in for a very tough test. Those same people claimed that Sweden were also a good side and that the match could go either way - likely to be a goal on it. Now they are poor teams because England have beaten them. The same will happen with Croatia. If England win, Croatia won’t be as good as they were before the match. Tunes will change.
But the same goes the other way. English fans were celebrating getting into the easier side of the group, best chance you've ever had to get to a world cup semi etc etc and that's when we though Spain were getting through!
Now its how dare you say we've had it easy!
So which is it?
Can we not just say that not many games are easy in the WC but some are harder than others and be done with it?
All of this just seems defensive for no reason
 
You seem intent on telling England fans how they ought to think and behave in light of being in the semis with an easier route than we could have. Comes across as preachy and sanctimonious.

Sorry you interpret opinions that differ from yours that way, it’s certainly not my intention. If I was an England fan I’d be having a summer to remember and couldn’t care if we played American Samoa in the final. Certainly wouldn’t be snapping at strangers on the internet for formulating an opinion, in a thread that raised the specific issue.

It’s certainly not any more preachy or sanctimonious than arguing the other side of the coin, but that makes you hypocritical or selective in your indignation
 
Last edited:
English fans were celebrating getting into the easier side of the group,
But very few English supporters on this website were celebrating this fact. The majority suspected we'd lose to Colombia.

Nothing is a given with England. We lost to Iceland 2 years ago.
 
Belgium narrowly beat Brazil. Before that their path was just as 'easy'

Of course, but they played and beat the tournament favorites and now play the tournaments second favorites. Therefore their path to the final is far from favorable as England's.

There is no agenda against England that some here are trying to prove. It's just baffling that people won't admin how easy England run to the final will be (if they make it).

The whole ''it's coming home'' viral movement came from England beating Panama because it was funny that both Panama were shit and England fans didn't have any faith in their own team to the point they were mocking them. Now all of a sudden those same fans are defending England like they're some sort of World Footballing powerhouse who have battered great teams to get where they are. Just look at the thread for the England squad being announced on Redcafe.

You can only beat what's in front of you, though. But I fail to see why some people refuse to believe that it's possibly the easiest route ever.

Disclaimer: I'm not anti England NT. If they won it I'd be trilled for the United players in the squad.
 
Last edited:
Sorry you interpret opinions that differ from yours that way, it’s certainly not my intention. If I was an England fan I’d be having a summer to remember and couldn’t care if we played American Samoa in the final. Certainly wouldn’t be snapping at strangers on the internet for formulating an opinion, in a thread that raised the specific issue.
What a bizarre response...

But you sort of proved my point by telling England supporters yet again how they should feel.

For what it's worth, I'm just happy we didn't embarrass ourselves at this tournament (yet). We've set the bar sufficiently low that nothing is ever easy and failure is expected.
 
But very few English supporters on this website were celebrating this fact. The majority suspected we'd lose to Colombia.

Nothing is a given with England. We lost to Iceland 2 years ago.
I'd argue against that since I was in the eye of that particular storm on here!
To be fair there were posts that started with if we beat Colombia.. But that's like posts on here during the season that tell us to take one game at a time when we get excited over an easier run of fixtures like we're the fecking players
You say it but you don't quite mean it, it just allows you to get excited with an out attached in case the worst happens.
 
England have been fortunate in how the draw has panned out, and especially as the likes of Germany, Argentina, Spain etc have all been knocked out of the competition, so they cannot be faced.

But as we all know, you can only beat what's put in front of you, and England have successfully done that so far, and reached a World Cup Semi Final for only the 3rd time in history.
That's a huge achievement that shouldn't be undervalued.
England now have a once in a lifetime opportunity, and bloody good luck to them...!!
 
Who cares, you guys made it to semi finals, enjoy the ride.

This is the point really. It was an easy path to the semi finals, but they have a real shot at getting to the final. Easy or not that would be fecking amazing
 
But the same goes the other way. English fans were celebrating getting into the easier side of the group, best chance you've ever had to get to a world cup semi etc etc and that's when we though Spain were getting through!
Now its how dare you say we've had it easy!
So which is it?
Can we not just say that not many games are easy in the WC but some are harder than others and be done with it?
All of this just seems defensive for no reason

I honestly don’t know anyone who was “celebrating” being in the bottom half of the draw. Maybe the odd fan here on the internet went crazy, but your average bloke in the street would have snapped your hand off for a semi final spot. Hopeful, yes. Expecting it, no. Everyone was still as nervous as feck. Who exactly was celebrating on this forum for example?

Of course lots of fans preferred to be in the bottom half, I certainly did, and of course it’s easisr than the top half, but it’s not “easy”. I think that’s where a lot of the disagreement comes from.
 
I'd argue against that since I was in the eye of that particular storm on here!
To be fair there were posts that started with if we beat Colombia.. But that's like posts on here during the season that tell us to take one game at a time when we get excited over an easier run of fixtures like we're the fecking players
You say it but you don't quite mean it, it just allows you to get excited with an out attached in case the worst happens.
Fair enough. Supporting United has traditionally been a very different prospect to supporting England. United are a highly successful and well-oiled machine. England are... well, they're not that. So being forward-looking as a United supporter is logical. As an England supporter it's not. Although in the post-SAF era at times I've definitely felt very England-like while supporting United. But it seems now that both are improving and i'm thrilled!
 
Yes. There were so many people claiming Colombia were a dangerous side and that England were in for a very tough test. Those same people claimed that Sweden were also a good side and that the match could go either way - likely to be a goal on it. Now they are poor teams because England have beaten them. The same will happen with Croatia. If England win, Croatia won’t be as good as they were before the match. Tunes will change.
Examples?
 
Of course, but they played and beat the tournament favorites and now play the tournaments second favorites. Therefore their path to the final is far from favorable as England's.

There is no agenda against England that some here are trying to prove. It's just baffling that people won't admit how easy England run to the final will be (if they make it).


England has had a relatively easy draw and there isn't a single England fan that disputes this.

Can you point to a post in this thread, from an England fan, that suggests otherwise?